[Cost Adaar] – [Rogue (Dual-Wield)] - [28] - [Male] - [Straight]
1. Are they a practitioner of Andrastianism?
No, but I hold no real hostilities towards the faith.
1a. If not, then what do they practice, if anything?: I practice the study of history and politics of Thedas.
1b. If religious, are they zealots, devout, spiritual, or do they only give lip service?: None of the above.
2. Are they pro-Circle?
In a sense. I believe that magic is a talent that must be taught to be controlled for the safety of both mages and non-mages alike. I don't agree that mages should be locked away and forcibly taken though.
2a. If so, are they pro-Templar?: Not exactly. The art of Templar “magic” is one that is useful in fighting magic-based combatants but I don't believe that Templar order should be tied to any religious institution.
2b. Are they anti-Mage?: No.
2c. Do they support the Circle, but also more independence for mages?: Exactly.
3. Are they pro-Mage?
If you are asking if I believe that we should treat mages like others, the my answer is yes...mostly.
3a. Are they anti-Templar?: No.
3b. Do they support Apostates, Maleficar, and/or Blood Mages?: Apostates, Maleficarum, and Blood Mages are not synonymous. I mage can be any combination or even non of the three. Apostates are simply free mages. I have no problem with that. Maleficarum are mages that actively use demons to use their goals. I take issue with them as they are highly susceptible to demon-possession.
3c. Do they support Tevinter style rule?: No. I don't think any group show oppress another just because they are simply mages or human. More importantly, I strongly oppose the slavery that thrives there.
4. What is their opinion of:
4a. Nobility: The Noble class, of both the humans and the dwarves, are ones that have their problems but to understand them is to understand the history and traditions that created the idea of nobility in the first place. For some places such as Orlais, the it is nearly impossible to rise into a higher class. However in other places, such as Orzammar and Fereldan (and even Tevinter to a extent), it is possible to rise in status due to the actions one takes. While the dwarves of Orzammar can gain a house by becoming a Paragon, Fereldan has seen commoners raise to regency (such as the case of Loghain MacTir).
4b. The Poor: As Vashoth, I relate much more to the plight of the comman man or elf then nobility. My family has few allies as both members of the Qun and the rest of Thedas do not look highly of us. In that case, I relate much to city elves. However, the Dalish are fascinating as they travel the continent searching for remnants of their past history. While we Vashoth have no lost past, I can understand the feeling of finding a place within the world.
5. What is their opinion of:
5a. The Qunari Faith: My family left the Qun before I was born. All I know of it, and by association my own people, I know through the stories I heard from them. I oppose the Qun. I find that it's constricting nature and denial of personal freedom to be detrimental to the overall prosperity of those within its society. However, I am not without an understanding for why people find comfort in it. There are some benefits that are not told by those within the Chantry or the Imperium. My upbringing allowed me to learn about the old life of the Qun with the benefit of being free from it. Most Thedans only apply to the latter.
5b. Imperial Andrastianism: A strange concession between the Chantry and the nation of Tevinter. On one hand, I appreciate that it ended a war that killed thousands. But with the experiences I've had with those from Tevinter, along with reports I've read from others, I can't help but get the notion that most people in Tevinter aren’t very devout to the prophet of Andraste and probably do not practice the belief in private. It seems more as a joke than a true religion.
5c. The Old Gods: Either tales of old deities no longer publicly acknowledged or a few of the greatest threats to Thedas, the Old Gods have shown to be quite resilient throughout history. It seems that most Tevinter truly believes in them. This is concerning since the only evidence of their existence is that their names are used to identify archdemons during a blight. They need to all be put down.
5d. The Dalish Faith: A fascinating faith. Most faiths in Thedas are not polytheist. I doubt they exist as gods but do believe that at least a few are actually spirits from the fade that communicate with elves from time to time.
5f. Atheism: I'd call myself an atheist but I'd have to specify more. Technically, dwarven faith and even the Qun are atheistic systems. I suppose agnostic would be a more appropriate term.
6. What is their opinion of:
6a. Dwarves: A fascinating race whose influence on the surface is greater than most humans realize. While I'm not a fan of their caste system, I respect their surviving culture and love that they value the truth and the collection of knowledge with their shaperates.
6b. City Elves: I respect them a lot. They are arguably the most oppressed faction of Thedas. While at least the mages have the power of the Fade at their disposal, City Elves are both outgunned and outnumbered while at he same time, surrounded by those who suppress them. Though, if the Hero of Fereldan is any indicator, there is strong potential with the elves
6c. Dalish Elves: While I understand their animosity towards non-Dalish, it is their pride and intolerance that will, ironically, be their downfall. The Dalish are obsessed with their past, but I can't help but feel that they are so proud, that hey would believe falsehoods, if it meant that they can use those facts to “prove” the superiority of the elvhen. Also, their abandonment of City Elves makes them nearly as bigoted as the “shemlen” they claim to oppose.
6d. Humans: They are the most numerous race in all of Thedas and hold the title of having the most variety of cultures as well. It's this reason that the Humans are the most interesting race to research for me. Whether it's learning about the Game of Orlais, the barbarian roots of Fereldan, or the political discord revolving around the throne of Nevara, there is always something more to learn about the dominant race in Thedas.
6e. (the) Kossith: Seeing as I myself am what some would call “Kossith” (a term that has seen a sharp decline in usage as of late), I certainly don't despise the race. Most of us are followers of the Qun, while the rest usually have to resort to mercenary work to stay alive. I hope that one day, Kossith, or the race of Qunari, will be treat with some level of equality in Thedas.
7. What is their opinion of:
7a. Orlais: It's a nation where a nobleman's tongue must be as sharp as his blade. The Game is so intertwined with their culture that it is possible to even speak with an Orlesian without becoming a player (or at least a pawn) in the grand game. Dealing with Orlesians will be interest since one must be as strong as they are smart or risk being stabbed in the back.
7b. Ferelden: It's a nation that values the “common man” more than Orlais or Tevinter. They've been through occupation, the Blight, and now the veil tears is literally ripping the nation apart. The fact that they still stand is a testament to its resilience.
7c. Tevinter: A curious nation that feels upside-down compared tot eh rest of Thedas. Mages rule and slavery is commonplace. There is very little to love about a place so oppressive to its own. The magic they learn could be useful though, since it's under less restrictions then Chantry-led nations like Orlais and Fereldan.
8. Are they idealistic or pragmatic?
A mix of both. Ideals are goals while pragmatism is the means to those goals, however lofty they may seem.
8a. Do the ends always justify the means?: Mostly, yes. If the goal is worth it, all means should be taken into considerations. However, sometimes, the steps taken can be detrimental to the goal. For example, if one wants to sacrifice a village to save a city, one could do so, but it may alienate them from other villages helping in the future. No village support could mean farmers do not help you can could ultimately lead to your demise. Long-term implications must be considered.
8b. Do the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few?: Yes. Always.
8c. Would they sacrifice themselves for others?: If that led to the most people being saved long-term, yes. Though I wouldn't be willing to die if I thought no one could carry my goals on without me.
9. What alignment are they?
I don't do “alignments”. People are not so simple as to be classified by a 3x3 chart.
10. How do they view their role as the Inquisitor?
Firstly, it's to bring peace to Thedas so that we may learn more about the world we live in. Those that oppose peace (such as demons, maleficarum, zealots, or war-mongers) must be stopped by any means necessary. As the Inquisitor, I also inquire, like my name suggests. One cannot hope to solve the world's conflicts while shrouded in ignorance.
11. Are they dutiful, or lazy?
Dutiful. This issues facing Thedas are too great to allow vices such as sloth dissuade us from action.
12. Are they intelligent?
Without surrendering too much of my own modesty, yes.
12a. Are they socially intelligent, and gifted at reading people?: I am pretty good socially, but living as a Vashoth, I haven't got the best experience dealing with the various races of Thedas.
12b. Are they academically intelligent, and widely versed?: Yes. My family were Ben-Hasserath before we left the Qun. Gathering knowledge of the world was our role in life, as per the doctrine of the triumvirate. I've studied the history of nations and cultures of Thedas extensively, even before becoming Inquisitor.
12c. Are they wise, and do they possesses common sense?: Wisdom and “common sense” are earned, not learned. I suppose that will come in time.
12d. Are they adaptable, or unable to cope with sudden change?: Change is inevitable and those who cannot cope, die. Such is the way of life. I can deal with it fine enough. All I can do for others is help them dealth with it to the best of my ability...or willingness.
12e. Are they skilled artistically?: Not particularly. I never found much of a use for the arts myself.
13. Are they funny, or serious?
Serious. I allow the humorous side of me out to those who I trust but not much more. It's not that I'm stoic or unwavering, it's just that as someone who has some much he is responsible for, people need someone they can look to for help, not a comedian.
13a. Is humor a defense mechanism?: I think any leader with a sense of humor uses it to relive tension for themselves or towards a situation.
13b. Do they try to be funny, and fail at it?: I suppose that's for others to ask, not me.
14. Are they a romantic, or do they fear commitment?
I don't fear commitment as much as I fear trust. Trust can be used against me. I doubt that I can let someone in too close without creating weakness for myself and my Inquisition.
15. Did they, or do they love their family?:Family is all I had as a Vashoth. It's a protective weave against outside dangers at times. I realize that sounds hypocritical, given my stance on trust. I guess what my opinion is on such matters comes down to practicality, like most things in my life. I can't maintain a healthy relationship with others if I can't trust them so I trust hose that I must in order to keep order. Everything comes back to 'means' and ends' after all.
Retour en haut
