111 réponses à ce sujet

[Puppy Love]

D&D alignments are a joke, 90% of all things they say are an alignment act nothing like the alignment is described.  Not even the developers know what alignment is.

[Neverwinter_Knight77]

Neutral Good, as with most of my characters.

[Phantom_Demon]

I knew about these alignments some odd years ago, I just did not know the meaning of them. After reading each one, and finally getting more insight as to what they mean after this whole time.

 

I have come to the conclusion, that this is basically myself that represents what my characters are, except for Hawke, as Hawke was intentionally already created as the "Help all but gain profit out of it" person in DA2. We were not Hawke, we played his character, but he was not our character to mold entirely as he already had an agenda. Basically, he has the entire molding of "Chaotic Neutral". Hawke does what he feels like and follows his own code, gaining Profit, whether he harms others or not is not his reasons, he does what is "Necessary". Whether that is true about his nature or not, that remains to be seen with others playing the game.

 

As for our Wardens, well, if we look at the roundabout from each choice, it's dependent on our own choices and not how the story will play out in the end, we have a purpose and goal, to reach that aim, we do what is "Needed". Which places our Warden in all of the 9 spectrums of Alignments, so kudos to Bioware for that thought.

 

As for our Inquisitor, we don't rightly know how it will all play out. But, from what has been told to us so far, we have a goal in mind, but don't rightly know what that goal is towards. We have the ability to close the tears in the veil, but don't know what that will do in the long run yet. We have a larger threat to contend with as of the one known as the "Elder One" as our primary villain of this game, possibly. So, our paths are clear, but to get there, we either have a "What needs to be done" or "Do whatever is Necessary" ideal.

 

But, in all honesty, I'm going into this too far and going all philosophical on a game that has you closing magic doors and fighting demons. Along with using magic.

 

In any case, I guess I will always play the "True Neutral" character in all my games, as best as I am able to with whatever I am given with from the developers of said games.

[PrinceofTime]

Like all my avatars, Chaotic Neutral.

[Gruntburner]

Neutral good. Do what you think is right, authority be damned.

[Ryzaki]

Chaotic Neutral probably. Does whatever she feels like whether saving someone's life or robbing them blind.

 

Edit: Lol took the test and got Chaotic evil. I was only off chaotic neutral by a point so close enough.

[Psycho_Kenshin]

Chaotic Good.

 

Its all the fun of doing whatever the hell i want, but without any consequences because im a good guy.

Ditto! Chaotic Good for me.

[LukaCrosszeria]

Ditto! Chaotic Good for me.

 

Same here, chaotic good inquisitor.

[AshesEleven]

Most likely a True Neutral or Neutral Good Inquisitor.  

[Moghedia]

Chaotic Good, and Neutral Evil for my second play through perhaps... I've not decided yet, but there is time I suppose.

[Willowhugger]

It's a tough call.

 

I want to be the Paragon Shepard of the Inquisition. The beautiful, shining Gandalf the White guy to contrast with the rest of the crappy world which is Thedas. However, I also want to be a big social reformer. If I'm Lawful Good, I want to also be the guy who says "this law is intolerable and I will NOT support it."

 

No Elf abuse, no Mage abuse, no Tevinter slavery.

Free everybody and let us all live in peace.

 

I'm okay with the game saying everyone in Thedas will think me a lunatic for this and this desire to fail miserably. I don't need to succeed in any of this--I just like the idea of being the guy who rises above his time period's prejudices and tries to work for a better tomorrow.

 

I'm the Steve Rogers of WW2's era.