Those who believe in the IT Theory are indoctrinated themselves. Have you read those youtube comments? All indoctrinated, I tell you. They simply believe in it as it is.
But don't worry, Marauder Shields was there to save my day.
Those who believe in the IT Theory are indoctrinated themselves. Have you read those youtube comments? All indoctrinated, I tell you. They simply believe in it as it is.
But don't worry, Marauder Shields was there to save my day.
It just says something about the ending when people actually want it to have all been a dream.
It just says something about the ending when people actually want it to have all been a dream.
That's where the "Extreme Indoctrination Theory" comes in. Nothing after Eden Prime was real...
lol, don't post IT stuff here on BSN. Most derptards here don't understand or fail to see what's right in front of them. Holy Fvck, lol. Just stop.
lol, don't post IT stuff here on BSN. Most derptards here don't understand or fail to see what's right in front of them. Holy Fvck, lol. Just stop.
You don't even stay consistent on whether the ending is IT or if it's lol scrub Walters Hudson bioderp lol. If people who don't accept IT as what is right in front of them are "derptards," what does that make you during your lapses out of the self-induced IT hypnosis?
First off. Aaron Rodgers is overrated. Big time.
Secondly, I've always believed IT is what's going on. I always have. And always will. But BSN or, what's it called now, "BioWare Forum" is no place for IT or in-depth discussions on narrative or thematic elements of Mass Effect. It's just not.
You know there's a discussion on another forum about the ending to The Sopranos. That's another controversial ending. Is Tony dead? Or is Tony alive? The writer won't even say. First the writer said he was dead. Then when the idea came for another series, he said Tony might not be dead. Then James Gandolfini died, and the new series went *poof*. And now the writer won't comment on it. So they're discussing whether Tony is dead or alive.
It's Schoedinger's Tony. Tony is in a box, and is alive or dead at the same time depending upon some prior random event. But you as the observer when you open the box will see Tony as either alive or dead but not both depending upon what happened in that random event which is unknown. Do you want to open the box?
I think it says more about the narrative to ME3 and ME2 in general when people start going with Extreme Indoctrination theory.
You know there's a discussion on another forum about the ending to The Sopranos. That's another controversial ending. Is Tony dead? Or is Tony alive? The writer won't even say. First the writer said he was dead. Then when the idea came for another series, he said Tony might not be dead. Then James Gandolfini died, and the new series went *poof*. And now the writer won't comment on it. So they're discussing whether Tony is dead or alive.
It's Schoedinger's Tony. Tony is in a box, and is alive or dead at the same time depending upon some prior random event. But you as the observer when you open the box will see Tony as either alive or dead but not both depending upon what happened in that random event which is unknown. Do you want to open the box?
I think it says more about the narrative to ME3 and ME2 in general when people start going with Extreme Indoctrination theory.
Isn't the Sopranos a show where things would cut to bla---
First off. Aaron Rodgers is overrated. Big time.
Secondly, I've always believed IT is what's going on. I always have. And always will. But BSN or, what's it called now, "BioWare Forum" is no place for IT or in-depth discussions on narrative or thematic elements of Mass Effect. It's just not.
Oh look, another guy who pretends to know football. You don't see that often!
No, you flip-flop routinely on the ending being IT "geeeeniusssss" or it being "lol Walters Bioderp"-nonsense like every other ME3 anti-ender, sometimes within the same post! Doesn't matter if you're trying to fool me or if you've forgotten yourself, the HBI does not forget.
Pre EC indoctrination makes sense beyond any arguments presented against it.
Post EC it's dead.
People can head cannon what they like it doesn't make them stupid for going one way or the other with it and it wouldn't make anyone else any smarter by default if it did.
When I first watched a youtube video outlining the indoctrination theory, I must admit that my mind was well and truly BLOWN...it seemed like it was an absolute masterstroke by Bioware in terms of how the story had progressed over the course of the trilogy, looking back at all the events of the story as if Shepherd was really indoctrinated.
But the post above me is correct, post EC it is truly dead. My personal opinion is that those who believed/continue to believe it are in a state of denial that the ending to such a beloved trilogy was so different from what they had justifiably expected.
Whenever the Dragon Age "series" of games ends, I hope no such theories have to be invented because of the ending being unsatisfactory.
First off. Aaron Rodgers is overrated. Big time.
Secondly, I've always believed IT is what's going on. I always have. And always will. But BSN or, what's it called now, "BioWare Forum" is no place for IT or in-depth discussions on narrative or thematic elements of Mass Effect. It's just not.
ITers in a nutshell. The only reason they still believe is to lord their "intellectual superiority" over others.