7 réponses à ce sujet

[Cainhurst Crow]

Call to them, make them take away the multiplayer for your single player game.

 

You cannot, for they do not exist.

 

In all seriousness though, the multiplayer dungeon crawl they announced for inquisition has potential to be quite good. I've always held that ME3's needed more polish and more features to have been pretty solid, and hopefully inquisition will provide just that. Though in my opinion not having a PVP mode does damage the games re-playability, and limits the types of things players can do such as free-for-all and team deathmatch type brawls.

 

For those out there who do think like the above, that all hope is lost because the multiplayer component is included in the game; calm down and think. Multiplayer doesn't drain resources, it has its own budget set up that otherwise wouldn't have gone to the game at all. Multiplayer didn't lead to mass effect 3 being a poorly written game, poor writing and a poor writing team did that. And thinking that multiplayer is a sign of a bad quality game, is akin to believing in the indoctrination theory in 2014.

[Serza]

Do not call to me with the shemlen god. I am a Dalish.

 

...and I support the multiplayer. I would've done without it (easily), but BEAT ME UP OVER IT, I SUPPORT IT.

[Br3admax]

Honestly, Darth, I was really disappointed that this wasn't a Chantry slam thread. I was kind of looking forward to it. 

 

 

Anyway, I'll play it whether it's good or not because my friends will. That's enough for me. 

[Cainhurst Crow]

Honestly, Darth, I was really disappointed that this wasn't a Chantry slam thread. I was kind of looking forward to it. 

 

 

Anyway, I'll play it whether it's good or not because my friends will. That's enough for me. 

 

Why would I? The chantry is awesome, being humanitarian, raising orphans, and shielding the world from dangerous spontaneous arsonists.

[Navasha]

I will have to do a wait-and-see approach myself.   I am not against multiplayer per say.   I certainly spent a good number of hours with ME3 MP, until it became apparent that their RNG just would not unlock a Geth for me.

 

I could see it as a welcome addition IF:

 

1) They keep their promise of keeping the MP separate from SP in all aspects

 

2) It doesn't become apparent that they limited the UI in SP so that it carries over nicely in MP.   This is still my fear, and until we get to see an actual PC UI in action, will likely remain.  

[raging_monkey]

Lets not forget human supremacy.

OT despite my wariness i liked the mp annoucement

[dekarserverbot]

Call to them, make them take away the multiplayer for your single player game.

 

You cannot, for they do not exist.

 

In all seriousness though, the multiplayer dungeon crawl they announced for inquisition has potential to be quite good. I've always held that ME3's needed more polish and more features to have been pretty solid, and hopefully inquisition will provide just that. Though in my opinion not having a PVP mode does damage the games re-playability, and limits the types of things players can do such as free-for-all and team deathmatch type brawls.

 

For those out there who do think like the above, that all hope is lost because the multiplayer component is included in the game; calm down and think. Multiplayer doesn't drain resources, it has its own budget set up that otherwise wouldn't have gone to the game at all. Multiplayer didn't lead to mass effect 3 being a poorly written game, poor writing and a poor writing team did that. And thinking that multiplayer is a sign of a bad quality game, is akin to believing in the indoctrination theory in 2014.

 

ok so if the maker does not exists then i preordered nothing, because "maker" is the name that people in DA universe gives to bioware...

 

your topic is bullshit nonsense

 

PD endoctrination still exist is called SCHOOL