I meant what I said. Slavery.
Innacurate.
Trigger words make for poor arguments.
The mages don't have any rights.
Incorrect. The very existence of the Fraternities is the "freedom of association" being employed.
I could point out other rights but if you claim mages don't have any, then all I need to do is use one to prove you wrong.
They have their babies stolen by the Chantry at birth.
That is not inherently connected to slavery. A free woman with a mental disability may see her baby taken away while Tevinter slaves are permitted to raise their own because they are expected to serve the master in turn.
You can try to argue that it's bad or unnecessary but it is not inextricably connected to slavery and thus does not serve as an example of how mages are slaves.
They're locked up all their lives, guarded by drug addict zealots.
There are happenstances that can lead to people being locked up all their lives; for instance, a contagiou disease or an heinous crimes.
Therefore, to be imprisioned for life is not the equivalent of slavery.
They can be raped, beaten or made Traquil illegally with no repercussion.
If a policeman beats and rapes a citizen and manages to get away with it, does that make her a slave? Does it make every other citizen a slave?
Mages are in as much danger of being victims of violence as every other person in Thedas. Probably less since they are, at least, dangerous.
Also, it would be incorrect to claim there is no repercussion for Templars who abuse their power. While they can intimidate their victims into silence; much like any other guardsman; the very fact Ser Alrik ordered his cohorts to not let Meredith know about his actions means he feared repercussion. in Kirkwall, of all places.
http://dragonage.wik..._Templar_Letter
There is nobody they can report abuses to.
Yes, there is. Anders speaks of how mages in Kirkwall were denied appearances at court which suggest this is a given right in other Circles in Thedas.
marriage is done rarely with special permission.
Yes, they are , arguably, prisioners. There is still a difference between that and a slave.
David Gaider will tell you as much. "Imprisonment, sure, but I'm not sure you can equate the mages to being slaves. Their life is not their own, but they are not servants to anyone."
http://forum.bioware...intended/page-9
They cannot own businesses
Solivitus say Hi.
http://dragonage.wik.../wiki/Solivitus
mages are often called upon to serve nobles as healers, or "perform" at parties, and are called upon in times of war as living weapons.
By their own choice. In fact, Wynne attempted to create a civil war in "Asunder" in order to have the mages be called upon for assistance because it would grant them bargaining power.
Likewise, Gregoir directs us to speak to Irving if we wish the mages to assist with fighting the Darkspawn.
The mages are not forced to do anything; they do it because they have a vested interest in earning points with the rulers of men.
So, we can scratch "forced labor" of the list of your accusation.
Are they paid for ay of this? Can they buy their own clothes or tools or food or equipment as soldiers?
Yes. A Tranquil in DA2 will tell you that Orsino raised the prices of potions because he was trying to earn money for the Circle.
Where exactly do you think the money the Tranquil make goes to? David Gaider already confirmed it all goes to the Circle.
So, they work to provide for themselves just like everyone else. Ergo, not slavery.
And yes I know the Tranquil enchant and such for money but they are no longer mages. Yet they are still confined to serve the Circle/Chantry.
If they aren't confined, it isn't by the Chantry.
Remember that they play a great role providing for the mages. And you think they don't take measures to ensure there is a steady supply of Tranquil working for the Circles?
As David Gaider already confirmed, the money they make doesn't go to the Chantry.
In conclusion, you have no grounds to claim that the Circle is a form of slavery.