Except there were no means of easy escape for those fighting in the valley. For people to escape they would've had to fight through the Wilder areas in front of them and traverse the marshlands, as the way behind them wasn't possible.
Take a look at the valley in Ostagar when you do Return to Ostagar, and you tell me how forces could easily escape by turning tail when they're surrounded on their right, left, and frontal flanks due to a ****** king's idiotic charge out of the security of the fortress which would've protected their right and left flanks and are now at risk of a double envelopment.
And if Loghain had sent up a signal, that would've compromised his own men. Because the Darkspawn would've seen it.
A monarch should always be a strategist in their own right. If they can't understand how to act in wartime then they're not fit to rule.
You forget that Cailan insisted on a "glorious battle the bards would speak of for centuries". Ostagar is an excellent defensive structure, but defensive tactics during a war -- specifically forces staying in a fortress -- does not make for particularly glamorous or glorious battles. What ideally should've been done is that the forces of Ostagar would remain in the fortress and fight the Darkspawn from there, trying to keep the Darkspawn out (think Helm's Deep).
But that's a "boring" strategy. Look at how often films have castle sieges. It makes for good drama, but the reality is that most battles of this nature were not like what the films depict.
Cailan couldn't have that. He wanted to make a charge with the Grey Wardens and be remembered for years to come, to live up to his ****** ideals of how a king should act. So Loghain capitulates because he can't win and devises a strategy based on how much information and might he has to work with that should do the trick. The Darkspawn are increasing with every battle, so he needs to find a stratagem that will allow the Ostagar forces to outmaneuver the Darkspawn.
Um, yeah, let's now qoute another fictional character about what king is right king... No, monarchs were not generals - not in the late middle age/renaissance, at which Ferelden is (loosely) based on. But, that doesn't matter, since IN THE GAME, it is said it was Loghain's plan, not Cailan's. The only thing that Cailan did that Loghain didn't want was that he joined the battle himself.
Imho, If Cailan sat out the battle, it would change nothing, because Loghain never intended to fight at Ostagar. There's a lot of evidence for that, if you pay attention. Howe's reinforcements never arrived, and he wasn't concerned about it all. Fergus Cousland, who was commanding Highever forces, was ordered to go scouting (which was way below his rank); the tower which was crucial for the plan, was not secured by Loghain's forces in advance. The whole 'plan' relied on two inexperienced soldiers - look at the instructions the Warden got: lit up the fire when they see ANOTHER signal (it was never explained from who) OR 1 hour after the start of the battle. In other words, REGARDLESS the situation on the field... If Loghain really planned to act according to this "strategy", you may bet he would take care of all details, whether Cailan agreed or not (it's not as if he never did things behind Marric's back during the rebellion). Even if Cailan sat out the battle, he would be abandoned and left to be overwhelmed and killed by darkspawn.





Retour en haut






