While I agree with this statement and I'm not claiming what Anders was helpful. But to my knowledge he was the most tormented mage by chantry that we meet in the game. Revenge is not justified, but when someone is that damaged it doesn't matter anymore. He was a product of hate and he returned the favor.Hell, maybe we could have seen reform if Anders had not chosen to act as he did. Maybe Lambert would have even been on board with some of them. What Anders did put everyone on edge, and understandably so.
Perhaps change could be accomplished with a moderate approach but it would not take decades, but rather centuries. Not until the economic and political structures could support rights movements would the Mages be able to tap to the concordance of the collective to force political reforms. In this time we are weighing a likely short though violent war against the current situation. Templars do not simply incarcerate mages. There are rather extensive instances of molestation and rape, constant psychological violence, and the right of tranquility which is not only psychological murder but also largely economical exploitation; the skills of the Tranquil in enchantment partly fund the Chantry and the Templars. All I am saying is, do not compare what Anders did with examples of social reforms in the past century cause there is no analogy. Rather consider any instances of actual social reform taking place peacefully in the Dark Ages.
There is no single instance of change that came peacefully in feudal times.





Retour en haut




