Yes, but it happened because that same organization's military arm bowed to nonviolent methods of resistance. (Of course, I am kinda interested to hear how Lambert would have reacted to such a thing.)
Lambert is a different man from a different country. He likely would have made very, VERY different choices, especially if he feared what may happen if the mages actually did get what they wanted.
I don't know about the templars and their leaders way back when, but Lambert let his experiences in Tevinter rule his opinion on what may happen if the mages didn't do exactly as he wanted them to.
Although, that would be an interesting alternate universe to read.
Another thing is the Circle Towers are controlled, in theory, by the Enchanters.
They're just supervised by the Templars.
Technically true in theory, doesn't seem to be common in actual practice 1000 years later.
Irving: If things were up to me, they'd be different, but the chantry....*sigh* (in regards to Jowan's upcoming tranquility)
Nah, but pointing out how dumb opinions are is a past time of human society.
I mean, just look at Socrates. Dude made history and altered the entire course of greek society by just pointing out peoples opinions as being opinions. That and playing the longest game of "Why?" ever created.
One of my favorite things he did was when he was debating the priests. They were telling him that by asking questions the way he was, he was inviting the wrath of the gods upon him as it was unholy. He responded by asking what was holy between, Hades, Ares, and Athena. Once that question was answered, he pointed out that those gods had different views and different things they approved of, so by those priests same logic, an act could be both holy and unholy at the same time depending on which god you worshiped.
He didn't make many friends by pointing out logical fallacies in their arguments.