Aller au contenu

Photo

Possible "evil" Ending


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
27 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Void-Creature

Void-Creature
  • Members
  • 16 messages

I'll start by saying that this is based on incomplete information. The theory I have here could be invalidated by further information as we play through the campaign, but I thought I'd post this idea here anyway.

 

The fade rifts are threatening to end the world. The Inquisitor is the only one who can close the fade rifts. So long as they remain open, we're important. Influential. No one can ignore us, no matter how much they might wish to. But what happens when the rifts are closed?

 

Sure, we'll remain important. We built an organization, made some connections. But before long we'd go the way of the Grey Wardens. Not needed anymore. The Inquisitor's influence and control would wane.

 

So leave some open. Don't close all of the rifts. Make it understood that if a province doesn't want to deal with Inquisitorial oversight, they're going to have some demon problems.

 

Maybe even learn how to open some on the land of key rivals. With the exclusive power of the Mark, no one would be able to stand in the way.

 

Ever.


  • Ruairi46, Gorguz, GalacticDonuts et 3 autres aiment ceci

#2
Althix

Althix
  • Members
  • 2 524 messages

from my experience, "evil" for bioware is to steal a candy from a baby.

 

so i really don't care about "good" or "evil" ending, i just want a logical ending. ending which will not leave people frustrated.



#3
Ruairi46

Ruairi46
  • Members
  • 681 messages

I love the image of my inquisitor asking for the king/queen of Fereldon to bow before me and then them refusing and then just going "Oh that won't do at all" and then opening multiple fade rifts while walking away.

frabz-COOL-GUYS-DONT-LOOK-AT-EXPLOSIONS-


  • Frogtoad51 aime ceci

#4
Pokemario

Pokemario
  • Members
  • 1 061 messages

from my experience, "evil" for bioware is to steal a candy from a baby.

 

Really? Because I thought having a mother sacrifice herself to save her son and then having that same child become possessed by a demon was pretty evil


  • ev76, New Kid, GalacticDonuts et 2 autres aiment ceci

#5
rigron

rigron
  • Members
  • 197 messages

More than the "evil" ending, I would call that the "pragmatic" ending xD


  • schall_und_rauch aime ceci

#6
Willowhugger

Willowhugger
  • Members
  • 3 489 messages

Really? Because I thought having a mother sacrifice herself to save her son and then having that same child become possessed by a demon was pretty evil

 

Bioware can be super-evil.

I don't think they can ever top Jade Empire, though.

 

Path of Closed Fist not being evil my ass.


  • Icy Magebane, Bellethiel, Pierce Miller et 1 autre aiment ceci

#7
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 489 messages

Really? Because I thought having a mother sacrifice herself to save her son and then having that same child become possessed by a demon was pretty evil

Well she wanted to do that i don't see problem here but what is evil or not is pretty much to person you ask.

 

But still love when game gives me opportunity to be petty pr*** like in case of that couple in dalish camp i loved that as well that ending for quest in kotor



#8
Althix

Althix
  • Members
  • 2 524 messages

Really? Because I thought

you see, there is a necessity in action. or lazyness.

 

if you would crucify this child, and force this mother to look on it. and after that you would drag body of this mother behind a horse for all around to see, that would be an evil act.

 

Another thing, Redcliffe incident is not an ending.



#9
Willowhugger

Willowhugger
  • Members
  • 3 489 messages

In the Darkspawn Chronicles I wanted to see Alistair have an army of Golems, Werewolves, and Templars.

Which would imply what sort of leader he is without your influence.



#10
Dubya75

Dubya75
  • Members
  • 4 598 messages

Nah, this approach is one of insecurity weakness. I could never support such an approach. It would really make the Inquisitor appear spineless.

Hopefully, he/she would have enough integrity and maintain enough dignity to step off when no longer needed.


  • Ammonite aime ceci

#11
Willowhugger

Willowhugger
  • Members
  • 3 489 messages

I would be open to the Inquisitor enslaving the Rifts and opening them in order to close them.

 

There was an anime with the premise that a group of Demon slayers exterminated the demons long ago.

So they made new ones to run a protection racket.

:-)



#12
Gorguz

Gorguz
  • Members
  • 235 messages

I'd like to be just like Dragon's Dogma:

Spoiler

It would be a good compromise: the Elder One keeps his status as deity (and can look for a way to overpower the Inquisitor), and the Inquisitor keeps his power.



#13
Maria Caliban

Maria Caliban
  • Members
  • 26 094 messages
The Inquisition will continue after the Breach has been fixed because the Templars have shown themselves unable to properly fulfill their duties and the Circles are in shambles. I expect the Inquisition will become a sort of... Interpol for Thedas.
  • Grieving Natashina, GalacticDonuts et Elfquisitor aiment ceci

#14
Willowhugger

Willowhugger
  • Members
  • 3 489 messages

The Inquisition will continue after the Breach has been fixed because the Templars have shown themselves unable to properly fulfill their duties and the Circles are in shambles. I expect the Inquisition will become a sort of... Interpol for Thedas.

 

I totally assume the Inquisition will absorb both the Mages and Templars both.

Which, unfortunately, means the Chantry is ****ed, militarily.



#15
Tinxa

Tinxa
  • Members
  • 1 548 messages

I would love the option to have an evil ending or an eding where everthing blows up because you failed, but I think that with the whole "playing after the ending" and "every and any decision made must absolutely be imported in later games" pretty much guarantees that any Inquisitor rules the world endings are off the table :(



#16
lordsaren101

lordsaren101
  • Members
  • 697 messages

Personally I would love an optional evil ending. Betray Thedas, side with the Elder One (Dumat, or my theory on who he is) for greater power and rule by the side of the Dragon god of Silence.



#17
Pierce Miller

Pierce Miller
  • Members
  • 1 026 messages

Bioware can be super-evil.

I don't think they can ever top Jade Empire, though.

 

Path of Closed Fist not being evil my ass.

You even get shadow-tentacles which I only noticed on my 4th playthrough, Try telling me that's not evil :P



#18
SerCambria358

SerCambria358
  • Members
  • 2 608 messages

you see, there is a necessity in action. or lazyness.

 

if you would crucify this child, and force this mother to look on it. and after that you would drag body of this mother behind a horse for all around to see, that would be an evil act.

 

Another thing, Redcliffe incident is not an ending.

You seem to be under the impression that extreme acts of evil are the only way something can qualify as evil.

 

Despite evil being dependent on subjective perception, it can be generally agreed that evil can be shown through much less extreme acts such as the one you used as an example



#19
wcholcombe

wcholcombe
  • Members
  • 2 738 messages

Well, many on here espouse a desire to burn Orlais, destroy the chantry, and murder templars.  I would consider any of the three to be the acts of an evil ending.



#20
Magdalena11

Magdalena11
  • Members
  • 2 843 messages

Pretty sure closing the rifts is going to be a priority.  I really don't  want to know where the game is going to go if it isn't, and I doubt I'll experience it on a first play in any event.



#21
MACharlie1

MACharlie1
  • Members
  • 3 437 messages

The problem with evil endings (at least TRUE evil endings) is that Bioware prides itself on choices mattering across games. When pretty much everyone has been murdered and everywhere is burned to the ground it puts a damper on sequels.

 

I believe someone said they regretted having everyone in the Suicide Mission being able to die...and the problems for continuity it created for ME3. 


  • Grieving Natashina aime ceci

#22
Void-Creature

Void-Creature
  • Members
  • 16 messages

You know, at times I wouldn't mind if they allowed for more endings that wouldn't carry over. They did this with Shepard being able to die at the end of ME2. You got a different ending sequence, and the file couldn't be brought forward into ME3. That's the only example I can think of though. Having an ending where the world is destroyed seems feasible for DA:I if they don't allow it to be carried forward.

 

Edit: HowdoIquoteIdonteven



#23
Nukekitten

Nukekitten
  • Members
  • 166 messages

from my experience, "evil" for bioware is to steal a candy from a baby.


"All our enemies shall be destroyed in a single glorious day...." ;)

#24
Puppy Love

Puppy Love
  • Members
  • 1 142 messages

For those saying you can't do pure evil in dragon age:

 

Dalish village, origins.  Offer to help boy woo girl, trick girl into sleeping with you, treat girl like crap, brag to boy, completely destroy their relationship, side will with werewolves, find girl you've degraded and humiliated, precede to cut off girl's head personally while she hears the screams of her loved ones dying around her.

 

Pure evil.



#25
ISpeakTheTruth

ISpeakTheTruth
  • Members
  • 1 642 messages

My 'evil' playthrough if I'm allowed to the moment the Elder One says "Bow before your new god and be spared." I want the option to immediately say "Yes Sire!" From that moment on I want the game the shift from trying to fix the rifts and defeat the Elder One to actively making more Rifts and helping the Elder One's influence spread.

 

I want so badly to betray everyone and lead an army of demons, blood mages, and dragons and destroy everyone who doesn't instantly convert to the one true god.

 

:D