184 réponses à ce sujet

[2Pac]

sacred 2 that game was awful

 

fable 2,fable 3,

dragon age 2

superman 64

naughty bear

Fable 2 and DA2 Had their flaws but they don't deserve to be on the list.

[wolfhowwl]

Fable 3 on the other hand...

[the_last_krogan]

Fable 2 and DA2 Had their flaws but they don't deserve to be on the list.

fable 2….had guns in it..ruined it..

dragon age 2 it felt like i was playing a half arsed dynasty warriors game

[Kaiser Arian XVII]

 

WTH is this crap?!

[Nerevar-as]

Joe has never liked the Risen games. Then again, he's always had bad luck with them.

 

Still. Risen was the best one since it did its job and felt like a spiritual successor to Gothic.

If he has problem with the Risen games, I think I´d pay to see him play Gothic 1 & 2, considering how much more unforgiving they are.

[FlyingSquirrel]

 

dragon game on the Atari 2600

 

Wait, do you mean "Adventure"?

 

Maybe you just needed someone to get the freakin' duck away from you...

[FlyingSquirrel]

There were two "point and click" adventure games from the late '90s that a friend and I sometimes played for a sort of ironic, so-bad-and/or-weird-that-they're-good value. One was called "Welcome to the Future," which we used to joke must have been designed by a bunch of stoned college students late at night who probably didn't even remember making the game. It clearly badly wanted to be the next "Myst," and in doing so created some admittedly impressive environments.

 

Unfortunately, there was nothing to *do* in these environments aside from occasionally trigger some songs about the "return of the ancients," otherwise click on a few things (I think maybe we were collecting "signs" that would fit together to form a key or something), and get lost in an underground maze. We never managed to get the "ancients" to return, much less find out who our character was, what we were doing in this place, or in general what the point of the game was supposed to be. From the (very sparse) information I could find online about this game, it sounded as though "winning," for those who managed it, just consisted of an extended slide show with more trippy graphics and music.

 

Then there was "Frankenstein," which may not have been too bad in general but suffered from an exceedingly hammy performance by the actor vocalizing your character's thoughts (you're playing the monster just after being awakened). For example, if you clicked on a locked door, you'd hear yourself announce "Locked!" in a very melodramatic way, and I remember at least one scene prompting an exclamation of "What has this vile bastard done to me?!" Other highlights: at one point you had to eat some food and vomit it back up to get the game to progress, and a scene where Dr. Frankenstein (played by Tim Curry, no less!) would suddenly emerge from under a table in his lab to marvel at his achievement of creating life and announce, "Modesty be damned, I am a genius!"

[Elhanan]

Pre-2000, I would say Hillsfar; an older D&D title. It seemed more like an arcade title; not a RPG. I quit after a little bit, was sickened by the prancing pony, and consider this the Plan 9 From Outer Space of games:

https://encrypted-tb...WNbcz01kTehfdn

Post-2000; would likely say Pool of Radiance: Ruins of Myth Drannor. I stayed away from this title, as it reportedly had a bug that wiped hard drives. Kinda holds the standard for bad games for me.

[slimgrin]

Ok, now that I've read this all and I'm filled with a sufficient amount of hate, I have to list one game:

 

 

This miserable pile of buggy, dumbed-down code was the biggest disappointment ever. Worse than DA2, worse than the ME3 ending. Ughh. 

 

*shakes fist at Egosoft*

[DalishRanger]

There are a handful of games I've played that were "meh" but only a few have I considered so bad that I couldn't finish them.

 

1. Samurai 20xx - probably the first game I recall hating so much I quit it halfway.

 

2. Two Worlds - I lasted maybe 20 minutes, at best. Eventually ended up throwing it out rather than selling it - I didn't feel like burdening someone else with its existence.

 

3. Witcher 2 - perhaps shouldn't be on the "worst" list per say - fine graphics and what little I got of the plot in the couple hours I played it were interesting enough. The issue was combat. The combat was atrocious. I quickly lost patience with it - it felt klunky and awkward. I eventually lost patience with it and I couldn't go on.

[Dominus]

The Wost of Us.



Unepic was kinda of a stinker. The D&D humor's tawdry at best, sort of like Order of the Stick for Dummies. Spore borders on worst. They had the right ideas for fundamental concepts, but the execution for its combat, balance, and fun factor made it very unfun. It had a lot of potential, too bad the sequel kinda screwed it up worse.

I'll second the Rogue Warrior. Not even worth it, besides the end song.

[Han Shot First]

Most of the games nominated in thread don't really deserve to be on any list of 'worst' games of all time. 'Worst games of all time' does not necessarily mean "Games I don't like." 

 

Anyway...E.T. the Extra-Terrestial for the Atari 2600 is probably the worst game of all time. It was partially responsible for Atari going belly up and nearly destroyed the gaming industry.

[Dominus]

Never played the first, but Two Worlds II felt like a poor man's witcher. Had a few neat quests, but I'd highly suggest other games instead. One of the bosses was impossibly difficult to the point that I had to enable cheats just to finish the game.

Maybe not the worst, but it was a dissapointment.

[ObserverStatus]

Neither does Fable III. This thread was a fail from the jump honestly. It's not about finding the worst games ever., it's just another "I hate *insert game here*" thread.

I don't care if it's one of the worst games ever or not, Resident Evil 5 still deserves to be hated on.