I don't buy the argument that synthetics would be vastly superior organics because of their superior "brain power". We use computers today to handle complex data processing, and would still do so in the future. Today's computers can process things much aster and more accurately than a human brain, but does that make them smarter? No. Processing power is not the same as intelligence. An AI would have this advantage over us as well, but we would cancel that out with the help of our own computers, and there is no evidence that an AI brain could match a human's in other areas that make us unique. The ability to "think outside the box". Starbrat was a great example of this, the billion year old "superior AI" that couldn't see the pointlessness of its "solution".
I'm using Mass Effect AI as the standard.
And, I think Starbrat had a point, even if it's not what I would have done.
by Catalyst logic, the answer would be to detroy any species that achieves interstellar travel to prevent such "conflict" from ever arising.
Except in my analogy the krogan are the AI. They were uplifted by the salarians. And ended up turning on the Council and nearl wiped them out.
And potentially themselves too, as they nuked themselves back to the Stone Age at least once on Tuchanka.
I was asking for your solution on those hypothetical issues.
I, for one, think that action would need to be taken in those two scenarios. That's to say, letting "whatever happens happens" is not acceptable. Next off, assuming they've shown not to be able listen to reason and they do plan to wipe out every other species, I would not rule out annihilating some very large percentage of their population nor biologically altering them to some end that diminishes their threat level like the genophage. Personally, I think I prefer the turian solution (bomb) to the salarian one (genophage), but I'm not sure.
Catalyst logic doesn't apply since preserving life is not a requirement here (yes, the Catalyst arguably does preserve life).
Kinda reminds me of a matrix quote (ironic, given ME3's supposed inspiration from it)
I've seen an agent punch through a concrete wall; men have emptied entire clips at them and hit nothing but air; yet, their strength, and their speed, are still based in a world that is built on rules. Because of that, they will never be as strong, or as fast, as *you* can be.
Strength, speed, intelligence, don't just come from a vacuum (well, unless Plot demands it) Synthetics still need resources, fuel, their machines still need to be built, their programs need to be stored somewhere. They are still bound by laws of physics. Synthetics, even Reapers, are not invincible. Not unless Plot demands they be. Heck look at the geth superstructure. Smashed to pieces by the quarians. Geth platforms, even with three centuries to evolve, fall to small arms fire.
I'm not saying synthetics are invincible, or that no organics exist that are in some way superior to an AI. However, (in the Mass Effect universe) they are capable of things beyond the realm of organic life, and the opposite is not true.
Organics have to manually enter things into a computer/machine to get the desired effect. EDI can disable firewalls on a ship and vent it to space before its crew even catches on. You saw what an unstoppable force that rogue VI in Overlord was, and it required Shepard entering cyberspace -- something no ordinary organic can do -- to stop it. They can turn the machines we depend on for many jobs against us, and then we do not have many alternatives to what we've lost. We stopped the Reapers largely because they were not allowed to be the threat they were protecting against, not entirely. They couldn't just steamroll everything because they needed to preserve the sapient species, but they certainly had the ability to wipe the galaxy clean of life and sit on top of it. And organics have shown willing to fight their AI even when they cannot win, twice with the geth, and many civilizations against the Reapers. It just takes one organic to instigate the conflict, and make lots of people (maybe even all of them) really sorry.
I suppose it doesn't matter, though. Our cycle invented some sort of doomsday-device that can kill them all, so we are plenty equipped to save ourselves if that threat manifests again. I mean, defeat is still possible, but there's some sound reason to believe we've advanced far enough to conquer it and will do so (probably want to refine the prototype, though). Even the Catalyst has to admit it by that point ("... my solution will not work anymore.")