That's more or less my gripe with Qunari defenders and proscribers of their Faith.
You defend those who began a continental wide war with no provocation, unleashed untold amounts of destruction rivaling only blights and killed Maker knows how many people, but it's swept under the rug because their ideology sounds nice.
Not sure if that one was aimed at me, but... Like hell I defend it. I don't see how
anyone could defend it. Hell, I've already pointed out on multiple occasions that the Qunari Wars was one of the few Exalted Marches where the Chantry was absolutely in the right.
An invasion is an invasion, regardless of the religion that backs it.
Besides, I keep pointing out the Qun would make me run for the hills every other post I make. I don't like it. It fascinates me from an RP perspective and I can see how many citizens of Thedas could see it as a very positive way of life, but I don't deny its oppressive nature.
Just as the elves certainly weren't innocent when they waited out a blight for the express purpose of making war upon Orlais.
Source on them waiting out the blight for the express purpose of making war on Orlais, please.
The situations aren't similar.
The war against the Dales was one the elves brought to the Chantry, to Orlais, to Humanity.
Kirkwall was an assault brought upon by a Qunari becoming frustrated with his inability to find a book.
Actually, the Kirkwall invasion was brought on by their inability to find the book,
and the government, city guard and Chantry being entirely apathetic to the suffering of its people and their combined refusal to do anything about it.
The attack on the Chantry was started because said Chantry had murdered one of the qunari's converts. The actual invasion was the result of already rising tensions snapping because the city guard of Kirkwall demanded two new converts be handed over to them to be punished for a crime
that was instigated by the very city guard demanding to hand them over.The book was was only part of the reason for the invasion. The other was that Kirkwall couldn't stop dancing on the toes of the qunari.
And no,
none of that justifies the invasion.
Now the elves, remember that even according to the kindest of sources (the Chantry itself) the elves were being accused of practising rituals of human sacrifice. Accusations they had no proof of whatsoever, and we find no trace of in elven culture. The Chantry was consciously trying to make the elves become feared and hated by the people.
Then we have the elves side of the story, which tells that they expelled Chantry missionaries from their land (if the Dalish are any indication, this was not done gently) and after that, the Chantry send templars.
If the accounts of red crossing are true, the invading templars led to elves snapping, and retaliating with an invasion of their own. Which led to the Exalted March on the dales.
So, yes, while the elves were not right in starting a war on their own, you'll excuse me if I don't exactly hold the Chantry blameless when the entire ordeal has "Orchestrated by the Chantry" written all over it. And it certainly does
not excuse them from destroying and entire culture and condemning an entire race to death or near-slavery.
Oh, and rewriting their own religion to erase the elven help in the war that founded the Chantry. Because we can't have people thinking that elves are actually capable of something, can we?
Not even the qunari are this malicious to the people they conquer.