Your bias view of the qunari is what shines through your responses. You completely ignore the multiple attacks on the Qunari while they literally sat there and did nothing yet dont mention that as a legitimate reason to take control of Kirkwall, how is his threat of the Qunari returning the same as the example you put? They arent the same.
As for Hawke winning, you must not watch a lot of movies or play any other games, there are plenty of other examples of opponents who on paper should no doubt win but due to plot armor, the "hero" of course wins. Deducing that he was pathetic because of this plot convenience isnt legitimate.
Losing a battle does not conclude that someone failed on every possible level, thats just a blatant exaggeration especially considering that the only failure that occured under his command was that final battle, beyond that he successfully assassinated someone who plotted against him and nearly took control of an entire city state with a hand full of warriors who were also sailors.
Are you doubting that the Qunari are the strongest military force in thedas?
I dont think you understand what irony is and why it doesnt apply to what he says, he says the qunari will return, what is the irony in that? They plan on invading, literally zero irony in that statement.
What the hell are you talking about. My bias? Since when the Qunari care about vengeance? If the demand of the Qun is the absolute law then Arishok defied this. You obviously don't understand the importance of Arishok leading an expedition. The fact that he is shows how important it is. Instead he abandons his duty to do something inconsequential.
If anyone is biased here, that's you. What the hell does it matter how the common plot of movies and games evolve. Do we discuss the coherence and the writing ability of Bioware or what happened? Because the latter is what I'm commenting on. He is pathetic (which is not the word I used) because he strayed from his duty, he lost the battle, he lost the duel and the success or failure of his mission is directly tied to the charity of the thief that created the trouble in the first place.
But in any case, he didn't actually take the town. Killed the viscount and barricaded himself into the keep is what he did. He still had to face the Templars, half the guard and their leadership was intact.
I don't doubt the Qunari military prowess, that's painfully obvious. But they didn't win last time the invaded and not only that, but one of the most important people to make this decision is dead. What will happen after this is yet to be seen, but we have indications of change.
I understand perfectly well what irony is. Thank you. I just have a different opinion.
Edit: Forgot to add that the Qunari did more than just sit there. They took advantage of the weakened state of Kirkwall and overstayed their welcome. I don't agree with what the fanatics did, but I doubt that Arishok isn't aware of this. If his concern was for the well being of his soldiers, then he could do something about it. Instead he stayed and replaced his loses with fresh recruits and didn't accept talks with the Viscount after the initial "agreement".