Then by your definition, Humanity wasn't spacefaring until they found the Prothean ruins. Which is this scenario, must be delayed at least another 100 years.
No, humanity wasn't truly a space faring race until after the discovery of the Prothean ruins. A true space faring race, in my opinion, means that it's a race that has the ability to travel outside their own system en mass.
Are you suggesting that general societal trends must apply equally to every member of a billion+ population?
I'm not the one suggesting that, you are the one suggesting that the Shadow Broker is an "average Yahg". I just stated that we don't have enough information on the Yahg, both physically and culturally and that chances are the Shadow Broker is most likely the exception, a genius among his people.
1. That is not a misunderstanding between two parties.
Actually it was, because the Persians blamed Athens for the uprising... when in fact it was one of their own governors who incited the riots. How then, is that not a misunderstanding?
2. The Iliad is not a historical document. It involves scenes such as Aphrodite carrying her son to safety. While its true Troy was destroyed by the Myceneans around 1250 BCE, it isn't known exactly why, but is probably part of the events that crippled most Mesopotamian civilization at that time.
Except that we have historical evidence to back it up. Archeological excavations have proven that there was in fact, a King Menelaus, and that there was a war with Troy during his time. As well, Troy is not located in Mesopotamia... it's in Turkey. There are countless myths and stories about Menelaus, Helen and Troy. Homer combined the story into what is now known as the Iliad.
A good historian knows that myths and legends, are often based on real things, but things are often added onto them as time marches forward to make the story more exciting when it's retold.
3. Which isn't a war, but a minor conflict that lasted ten days. Not a legitimate reason.
Ummm... it was still a war. Even if it was short, it still meets wars started over misunderstandings/minor offenses.
4. No, just no. WWI was started because the extremely complicated strings of European alliances pulling the nations into war, largely because of economic and colonial tensions. Even the way you put it, it was not a misunderstanding.
*Sigh* I so enjoy when someone doesn't bother to actually research, pretends to know what they are talking about. Please actually COMPREHEND what I said, I stated that there are a bunch of wars started over minor misunderstandings AND OFFENSES! The military build up would be considered a MINOR OFFENSE, this is due to the fact that every European nation created a system where they could quickly recruit, train, arm and field the biggest possible army they could get in the shortest amount of time. The system was devised to ensure that no one would start a massive military build up without being countered. The only problem was, there was no way to stop this system once it started!
What lead to the event of the military build up was the "extremely complicated strings of European alliances", what lead to the actual war was the fact that the massive military build up created such a tense and hostile atmosphere in Europe, that just about anything would have set the war off.
5. Not really a misunderstanding, but an overreaction coupled with the British desire to continue the slave trade in Spanish territory.
It's a minor offense used as an excuse to start a war. Jenkins was lucky, most smugglers back then were arrested and hung, killed out right or pressed into indentured service into the royal navy.
7. It was also started over southern fear that slavery was going to be ended, socio-economic tensions between the North and the South, and a multitude of other reasons. While Lincoln being elected did set off the powder keg, it was less about Lincoln and his views and the fact that a Lincoln-led government would be very abolitionist, because despite Lincoln's stated desire of only containing slavery in the South, there were also many people who wanted to ban it outright. N
And that fear was used by secessionists to fuel the misunderstanding...
8. It was started by Iraq invading Kuwait. Blaming the US ambassador for that is just ****** stupid.
So where then, did I blame a US ambassador, for the war? I stated a fact, Saddam sought and asked how the US feels about Kuwait. April Glaspie replies:
"We have no opinion on your Arab-Arab conflicts, such as your dispute with Kuwait. Secretary Baker has directed me to emphasize the instruction, first given to Iraq in the 1960s, that the Kuwait issue is not associated with America."
Anyone who was looking to start a war would take this statement as "We don't care what you do". So please, don't project yourself, onto me.
I gave you the examples, you can try to nit pick as much as you want, won't change reality.
This is based on the Codex.
Thinking at Salarian speeds and being said to have "unrivaled mental adaptability" more or less covers all that.
It's a reference to Niftu Cal. I changed my picture a little bit ago.
And the Codex is infallible now? Once again, it's based on the VERY LITTLE INFORMATION THAT IS KNOWN! Thus, it cannot be taken at face value until more information is discovered. The Codex is constantly upgraded every game, don't forget that in ME1 the codex stated the Reapers were nothing but a myth.
I'll state the fact that being able to think faster does not automatically mean one is smarter.
I'm well aware of that, I always encouraged him to go fight the Sisters. My statement though, was to the point of how you're acting like everything you say is factually accurate... when it is not.