Aller au contenu

Photo

The rest of the DAI Specializations revealed!


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
177 réponses à ce sujet

#151
Heimdall

Heimdall
  • Members
  • 13 235 messages
I almost wish I hadn't settled on a Warrior-Templar as the most fitting spec for the character I'm looking to play.

Necromancer sounds like so much fun :)

#152
nutcrackr

nutcrackr
  • Members
  • 249 messages

Quite a few of these sounds good. Probably stick with Templar or Champion, some brief gameplay videos might help me decide though.



#153
Majestic Jazz

Majestic Jazz
  • Members
  • 1 966 messages

Willl companions have their own unique trees/specializations like DA2? Or would they be using the same specializations as the Inquisitor?



#154
Kaiser Arian XVII

Kaiser Arian XVII
  • Members
  • 17 283 messages

I like Templar, Assassin and Knight Enchanter the most. Good additions.

 

We now need to see how these class work.



#155
Kage

Kage
  • Members
  • 599 messages

Willl companions have their own unique trees/specializations like DA2? Or would they be using the same specializations as the Inquisitor?

 

We are actually not sure about that.

Someone asked in the RAPTR Q&A session, but we got a kind of ambigious response. They said that all companions had their own specialization that makes sense with their character. They said "consider Cole...".

 

However, this does not answer the question of "will those specializations be different from the Inquisitor ones?".

 

Because if you check the specializations, we have 1 specialization for each character, which makes a lot of sense with them.

Assassin now has the stealth mechanic integrated in it, and we know that Cole is a stealthy assassin, it makes a lot of sense. And the same happens with the rest, Cassandra/Templar, Iron bull / Reaver, Blackwall / Champion, Sera /Tempest, Varric /Artificier, Vivienne / KE, Dorian /Necro and Solas /Rift.

 

They ALL match perfectly what we know from those companions, so I think that specializations will be the same, since if not that would be hell of a coincidence!


  • Patchwork aime ceci

#156
AshesEleven

AshesEleven
  • Members
  • 1 575 messages

We are actually not sure about that.

Someone asked in the RAPTR Q&A session, but we got a kind of ambigious response. They said that all companions had their own specialization that makes sense with their character. They said "consider Cole...".

 

However, this does not answer the question of "will those specializations be different from the Inquisitor ones?".

 

Because if you check the specializations, we have 1 specialization for each character, which makes a lot of sense with them.

Assassin now has the stealth mechanic integrated in it, and we know that Cole is a stealthy assassin, it makes a lot of sense. And the same happens with the rest, Cassandra/Templar, Iron bull / Reaver, Blackwall / Champion, Sera /Tempest, Varric /Artificier, Vivienne / KE, Dorian /Necro and Solas /Rift.

 

They ALL match perfectly what we know from those companions, so I think that specializations will be the same, since if not that would be hell of a coincidence!

 

I just thought of something.

 

We know that we learn specializations from different quest givers after they join the Inquisition.  But maybe they could teach specializations you can't get/don't want to some of your companions.  That could be why we saw Iron Bull as a Reaver.

 

So companions could have their own unique trees, and then could also learn a specialization that the Inquisitor hasn't learned.  



#157
SomeoneStoleMyName

SomeoneStoleMyName
  • Members
  • 2 481 messages

Kinda disappointed with Necromancer. Seems they will focus more on CC and utility than raising powerful minions.

 



#158
Majestic Jazz

Majestic Jazz
  • Members
  • 1 966 messages

We are actually not sure about that.
Someone asked in the RAPTR Q&A session, but we got a kind of ambigious response. They said that all companions had their own specialization that makes sense with their character. They said "consider Cole...".

However, this does not answer the question of "will those specializations be different from the Inquisitor ones?".

Because if you check the specializations, we have 1 specialization for each character, which makes a lot of sense with them.
Assassin now has the stealth mechanic integrated in it, and we know that Cole is a stealthy assassin, it makes a lot of sense. And the same happens with the rest, Cassandra/Templar, Iron bull / Reaver, Blackwall / Champion, Sera /Tempest, Varric /Artificier, Vivienne / KE, Dorian /Necro and Solas /Rift.

They ALL match perfectly what we know from those companions, so I think that specializations will be the same, since if not that would be hell of a coincidence!


If that is the case, then that sucks

#159
themageguy

themageguy
  • Members
  • 3 176 messages

Hmm. Rogue specs aren't exactly blowing my skirt up; of the three the Tempest sounds the most intriguing. I hope it plays well with a bow, though.

Looks like I might be rolling mages after my rogue though. They all sound pretty awesome!


i think it should play well with a bow quite well. We all saw thus spec ages ago without actually realising it. Sera was using a bow at the time.

#160
themageguy

themageguy
  • Members
  • 3 176 messages
http://m.youtube.com...h?v=hj8SVFRF2bw

At 55/56 seconds. :D

i believe the ice, lightning and fire icons are related to the tempest spec.

#161
Majestic Jazz

Majestic Jazz
  • Members
  • 1 966 messages

http://m.youtube.com...h?v=hj8SVFRF2bw

At 55 seconds. :D


I dont get it. What are we looking at?

#162
Mr.Hmm

Mr.Hmm
  • Members
  • 243 messages

I think it was the mage that casted 3 yellow light balls at the enemy... somehow that one felt like Necromancer (debuffing), cant be sure tho.



#163
themageguy

themageguy
  • Members
  • 3 176 messages

I dont get it. What are we looking at?


i edited the original post. Basically the icons we see in pretty sure are the ones a tempest has.

#164
Mr.Hmm

Mr.Hmm
  • Members
  • 243 messages

Yeah i checked again its the ones that Sera was having on (Tempest Skills)



#165
simpatikool

simpatikool
  • Members
  • 705 messages

Still going Reaver me thinks first. But I will likely try out many many many of these character types.



#166
simpatikool

simpatikool
  • Members
  • 705 messages

Still going Reaver me thinks first. But I will likely try out many many many of these character types.



#167
Medhia_Nox

Medhia_Nox
  • Members
  • 3 530 messages

Unless the Necromancer also has anti-spirit spells - I'll have to pass.  My Inquisitor believes Fade entities are incompatible with the material Thedas and must be eradicated. 

 

I'm hoping Rift Mage has a lot of anti-magic spells - out of the three, it seems like the one that might (as it manipulates the Fade itself).

 

So - Rift Mage or Knight Enchanter for me.



#168
LastFadingSmile

LastFadingSmile
  • Members
  • 1 791 messages

i think it should play well with a bow quite well. We all saw thus spec ages ago without actually realising it. Sera was using a bow at the time.

True enough. I won't be entirely satisfied until I can see them in-game and in action, but I'm sure it will be fine. If I have to adjust my play style some to accommodate, so be it; I'll still make and love my rogue, no doubt. Just might not end up being as I'd expected. More than anything I'm just a bit underwhelmed with the rogue specs, since none of them really scream 'archer' to me, while in contrast, all of the mage ones excited me for their potential. 

Basically, we just need this damned game to come out already so we can get in there and see for ourselves, plzthx. :P


  • HeyCal aime ceci

#169
Mr.House

Mr.House
  • Members
  • 23 338 messages

AM disappointing warriors didn't really get a new spec.



#170
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages

Kinda disappointed by the Tempest 

 

And warriors should've gotten atleast one new spec



#171
PopCola

PopCola
  • Members
  • 14 messages

Well, I sure wasn't expecting that for Tempest. I was thinking of going with Artificer for my rogue while just roleplaying as an alchemist. Which to choose...?



#172
Ms .45

Ms .45
  • Members
  • 334 messages

Well.... Artificer seems more bow friendly while Tempest pretty much requires you join the fray. Though if we're talking thematically, then yeah, you're right.

Don't forget that rogues have always been able to make bombs and poison - it was just never put in a specialisation. In DAO you had to put points into Poison-Making, but you could do it whether you were a dual-wielder or an archer.

Having seen the archery skills posted, I'm wondering if there is such a thing as general rogue skills (including archery, stealth, lockpicking etc) which branch into specialisations once you're a high enough level? Similar to The Witcher 2 where you had to fill out the introductory skills (hitpoints, dagger throwing etc) before you could choose Mage, Swordsman or Alchemy. 



#173
Ms .45

Ms .45
  • Members
  • 334 messages

Sorry, double post - well, since we're talking, I'm thinking human female Rift Mage for first playthrough and dwarven female Tempest for second. Male qunari reaver for Dorian :P



#174
Reznore57

Reznore57
  • Members
  • 6 144 messages

 

Having seen the archery skills posted, I'm wondering if there is such a thing as general rogue skills (including archery, stealth, lockpicking etc) which branch into specialisations once you're a high enough level? Similar to The Witcher 2 where you had to fill out the introductory skills (hitpoints, dagger throwing etc) before you could choose Mage, Swordsman or Alchemy. 

 

Lockpicking is something all rogue can do , it's part of a set of exploration skills each class has.

Now in some demo Cole couldn't open a door , he didn't have the level required or something.

I don't know if we can level up those skills or it was just locked because well it's a demo.



#175
Zakhar

Zakhar
  • Members
  • 636 messages

AM disappointing warriors didn't really get a new spec.

I meam to be fair. What can you do with warriors? Fast sword welders? Duelist in last two games.

Anything else would be too uninteresting or wouldn't fit the character.