As Lawful Good not only will the mages face the sword so will the templers the both have set society in disarray all will be brought to justice and at last there will be peace
That sounds more like Lawful Neutral to me.
As Lawful Good not only will the mages face the sword so will the templers the both have set society in disarray all will be brought to justice and at last there will be peace
That sounds more like Lawful Neutral to me.
http://easydamus.com/alignment.html be my quest
"Good" implies altruism, respect for life, and a concern for the dignity of sentient beings.
"Evil" implies hurting, oppressing, and killing others.
You certainly sound at LEAST neautral if your aim is to kill every templar and mage.
In dao, what ever origin we picked meant that the 6 characters we could of picked died in the time line.
So that in case would be the same in dai. Most likely all the character origins of dai are going to be in the conference and when it's bombed 3 people are going to die. That's if the human noble and mage are counted as one and are the variation a single person per storyline and one dalish is sent per story line. Other wise that means 5 characters would die.
Food for thought
In a metagame sense, yes. Immersed in the world of Thedas, no. The choice is not made, we were born our character. Thus it is easy, in a role-playing sense, to navigate around any responsibility for this, um, murder.
As Lawful Good not only will the mages face the sword so will the templers the both have set society in disarray all will be brought to justice and at last there will be peace
Killing everyone in the name of order and peace is lawful neutral; lawful good would just form a peace.
Or try to minimize casualties at least. It's not always possible to solve things peacefully.
1. Anders started the war
2. misread the topic
Anders is a human male, so all of them must be put to the sword.
In Origins it was Duncan's fault for not sending wardens to other potential recruits, this time they all die anyway it's just that whoever is selected by the Universe as the Hero (i.e us choosing out inquisitor) gets the glowy hand instead
In a sense, I suppose you are making a choice as to who got selected to survive, since the Dalish, the Chantry, the qunari mercenaries, and the carta are going to send a representative regardless, in one capacity or another. Three people are always going to die, though, so you do get to pick one to survive. But, if you want to do it differently next time, you can pick a different character. Otherwise it would wind up like Darkspawn Chronicles, were no one survived and the Archdemon won.
Don't feel guilty because you can only "save" one. Taking that thought to the extreme, if you don't play at all, the game will go on without you and everyone will die and the bad guys will win.
They were already dead, they just didn't know it yet.
Anyway, on my console, each of the origins and classes will be getting his/her fair chance at being Inquisitor so I refuse to feel guilty about this thread! ![]()
Anders suddenly became the king and representative for all mages?
That is a role he took upon himself when he decided to speak for all mages' liberation.Not that I am against mages, but if I were I would see him as the leader of a terrorist movement.
Killing everyone in the name of order and peace is lawful neutral; lawful good would just form a peace.
I got those two mixed up so yes i would be lawful neutral
I quite like the whole other origin chars dying thing. Found it quite awesome the first time i realised that when i freed leske the Commoner origin died. I was like 'FOUND MY CORPSE!"
Also it connects everyone together which i think is cool and gives the world a vibrancy
I never said he became king but his whole killing of a entire chantry did not help i might be bit wrong that he started the war but that did not paint mages in a good light
Got it. Next time someone does something wrong, I will judge any and everyone affiliated with them in any way.
Just about everything else we do in the game is probably gonna damn someone to death too, though a lot of them will deserve it.
Maybe your inq deserves it in my inq's universe. ![]()
Got it. Next time someone does something wrong, I will judge any and everyone affiliated with them in any way.
Do we just use strawman arguments all the time around here? What kind of statement is that? There is literally a full on mage civil war occurring. The ONLY society that is a real life example of a "free mage" society is one that is beyond corrupt, where the non-mage citizens are not treated with basic human decency. The threat of the mage uprising, in a universe where each mage is "worth at least 10" people in a fight, is very real. Mages are fighting for their freedom, but that freedom was not won through sit ins or civil disobedience, but through tearing down an entire religion. (I'm not religious, but that is a significant undertaking that is going to ****** off everyone.) When your actions to free people are acts of terrorism that literally push both sides of an issue to the point that there can no longer be peace, that is going to paint the war mages are fighting in his light.
Do we just use strawman arguments all the time around here? What kind of statement is that? There is literally a full on mage civil war occurring. The ONLY society that is a real life example of a "free mage" society is one that is beyond corrupt, where the non-mage citizens are not treated with basic human decency. The threat of the mage uprising, in a universe where each mage is "worth at least 10" people in a fight, is very real. Mages are fighting for their freedom, but that freedom was not won through sit ins or civil disobedience, but through tearing down an entire religion. (I'm not religious, but that is a significant undertaking that is going to ****** off everyone.) When your actions to free people are acts of terrorism that literally push both sides of an issue to the point that there can no longer be peace, that is going to paint the war mages are fighting in his light.
Bad example. Tevinter is not an example of why free mages are bad. From the every start Tevinter was a mage centered society that looked down any any one else with out their power as lesser. Even after losing to Andraste that has never changed. The issue with Tevinter is their core values not that they are mages. They are an example that magic with out regulation is bad not free mages are bad. Added, you are missing out the point that not only did most of the mages did not want this war but they were forced into it by the templers miss management and pro war mages who don't listen. They issue is you're paint every mage with the same brush and the last person to do that in DA was a crazy woman.
With that this topic is not the place to talk about it ether.
Well if you're a glass half-empty kind of person, sure.
Look at it this way: if we didn't pick a character and kill the Archdemon they'd be dead anyway, and so would the one from your origin!
To be honest... those little bits where you find out that the other Origins actually do happen regardless of you picking them.. small thing... but really solidified one of the reasons why i just love Origins...
Favorite is when on my first playthrough as Human Noble you break into Carta hideout and the dwarf there talks about how his friend in the other cell just sat there, refused to eat and died....
Then like three years later.. i got round to creating a Dwarf Commoner... wound up in that cell and was like 'hoooooot damm'
Yeah, you are right. Those 5 other characters won't be alive.