Must you continue to attack Hawke for it, though?
Keep in mind that a lot of things for DA2 had to be canceled because of fan reactions. This likely was responsible for cutting out the Warden.
If you compare Hawke and the Warden, you can see why.
Hawke's story was choking and restrictive.
You cannot save your mother by hiring guards with all the riches you found. You cannot choose between saving your siblings or not saving them or saving both of them. You cannot rule the city even though you clearly had more support than Meredith or Orsino and Bioware's tagline for Hawke in DA2 was "Rise to Power" which Hawke did not accomplish.
Hawke was also in many ways a bystander with the inability to do any action with a different outcome due to the crappy storytelling. Corypheus was freed regardless of whatever you do. Tallis gets to have the list of Qunari agents regardless of whatever you do. Leandra dies regardless of whatever you do. Either Bethany or Carver dies at the prologue regardless of whatever you do.
Contrast this with the Warden.They can either be kings or queens or advisors. They have the potential to rule a whole state, Amaranthine. They can have actions that have actual consequences as opposed to "lolnopewhateveryoudothesameresultasalways" !
Warden was also much more flexible. You have 16 variations whereas you only have 6 variations of Hawke. The Warden also did not have a voice which made RP-ing much easier and allowed for more dialogue options. With Hawke we get the standard 3 with occasional investigate.
With Warden, you could roleplay and you had a real sense of agency. With Hawke, you felt you were being strung along with no agency whatsoever.