Yeah, I'm not sure what definition of culture you're using.
The Roman empire was based on conquest and assimilating client peoples, that is true. However, that describes most significant civilizations through history and isn't the sum total of any of them generally.
It really doesn't though, it just describes the empires built on conquest and assimilating. There are examples in history of civilizations that just were like there.
You treat "conquest" as some kind of sign of significance whereas to me it's just conquest.
Besides if they were so significant than how come Scotland curb stomped them with like pitchforks and stones?
I mean Rome couldn't assimilate like 250 miles to the north of them at any rate either Germany beat them up too.
They assimilated like parts of Spain eventually and slowly took over pieces of Greece although even then, it took like 7 tries to take Crete or something.
It wasn't an empire, barely, to be honest.
I mean heck, everyone ultimately rebelled anyway, so that assimilation wasn't even an assimiliation, except for Gauls and Romans making France I guess.





Retour en haut




