Aller au contenu

Photo

Homosexuality in Thedas


1071 réponses à ce sujet

#476
CuriousArtemis

CuriousArtemis
  • Members
  • 19 656 messages

But I wonder if we'll get any ONS like in DAO. Hopefully they'll be a mix of hetero and homosexual options if so. And hopefully they don't look like Cammen >_> I won't be able to mod that face this time.

 

That's the way to do representation imo... keep the all bi LI (so you can romance whoever you want!) but have canonically gay and lesbian (and bi) NPCs, some of whom you can only sleep with if you're a guy/girl. Also canonically gay and lesbian NPC couples.


  • Dirthamen et Who Knows aiment ceci

#477
Who Knows

Who Knows
  • Members
  • 1 328 messages

IMO: Isabela's rival romance is more believable than Fenris with pro-mage freedom mage Hawke or the rivalry Merrill romance in general (made even worse if Hawke is pro-templar).



#478
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 423 messages

That's the way to do representation imo... keep the all bi LI (so you can romance whoever you want!) but have canonically gay and lesbian (and bi) NPCs, some of whom you can only sleep with if you're a guy/girl. Also canonically gay and lesbian NPC couples.

 

That's what I wanted from the first place (with gay and lesbian companions) but we got the system we got. Hopefully for the next DA game the ships will be more balanced.


  • CuriousArtemis aime ceci

#479
CuriousArtemis

CuriousArtemis
  • Members
  • 19 656 messages

That's what I wanted from the first place (with gay and lesbian companions) but we got the system we got. Hopefully for the next DA game the ships will be more balanced.

 

Yeah though they probably feel they just can't win at this point. But adding two extra straight dudes was a mistake imo. Just breeds bitterness.



#480
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 423 messages

IMO: Isabela's rival romance is more believable than Fenris with pro-mage freedom mage Hawke or the rivalry Merrill romance in general (made even worse if Hawke is pro-templar).

 

To each their own. I played the latter two enough that to me it works. Mostly it's the personality clash that gets me. Isabela seems to be under the impression that a rival Hawke has to be a hardass and boring because he/she rivaled her. That turned me right off.

 

You know...that's probably what primarily bothers me. The assumption about my Hawke's character because rivaling Isabela =! being a stick in the mud.

 

Merill and Fenris' rivalrymances don't make assumptions about your Hawke's character outside of their rivalry cause (Blood Magic and the Eluvian with Merrill and Mages with Fenris) where's Isabela's does.

 

Yeah though they probably feel they just can't win at this point. But adding two extra straight dudes was a mistake imo. Just breeds bitterness.

 

Pretty much =/



#481
Who Knows

Who Knows
  • Members
  • 1 328 messages

That's the way to do representation imo... keep the all bi LI (so you can romance whoever you want!) but have canonically gay and lesbian (and bi) NPCs, some of whom you can only sleep with if you're a guy/girl. Also canonically gay and lesbian NPC couples.

I do agree that is the best route. The thing I expect to miss out on, though, is the amount of reference to the genders involved that straight and gay love interests seem to get. Overall I think it's more important for everyone (well, monosexuals, bisexuals and so on get more options by default) to have equal choice, but it may be nice if the romances aren't too copy and paste with either gender.



#482
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

Mostly because I don't see Isabela romancing someone she finds boring and uptight. So it just struck me as really...odd. That plus the love scene being the same for friendship and rivalry pretty much (and that god awful what about love line) and nope.

 

Edit: That and the fact that the game seems to assume my rivalmancing Isabela Hawke is boring and uptight to begin with.

Well, I would hope that Anders wouldn't romance a templar shill, or Merrill an overbearing control freak, but none of the LIs seem all that smart about love. It helps that Hawke doesn't ever actually try to control Isabela even on rivalry, however. And Isabela seems annoyed at a rivaled Hawke solely because Hawke somehow makes her look bad, but she avoids trying to phrase it like that.

 

And where is Hawke boring and uptight?

 

 

Aww I guess no cookies for you :( I made them with love and care and everything. Oh wells!

There's no need to pretend that we're not longstanding enemies, fear not.



#483
In Exile

In Exile
  • Members
  • 28 738 messages

XD watch a playthrough? I prefer the rivalrymances with funny Hawke. Diplo Hawke sounds like a teacher a lot of the time and aggressive Hawke while amusing is a bit high on the douche scale.

I liked em. There were some "huh" moments (mostly as a result of them being too similar to the friendship mance at parts) but they worked for me. Well except isabela's. That rivalrymance I will never understand. Her friendship mance is great. Rivalry is wut.


That's strange - the rivalmance totally made sense to me: Hawke is trying to get her on the straight and narrow and by teaching her that she should care for her fellow person.

The Fenris rivalmance always made me uncomfortable.
  • Who Knows aime ceci

#484
Br3admax

Br3admax
  • Members
  • 12 316 messages

Enemies? Lol it's a forum. Chill, peeps. 



#485
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

That's strange - the rivalmance totally made sense to me: Hawke is trying to get her on the straight and narrow and by teaching her that she should care for her fellow person.

The Fenris rivalmance always made me uncomfortable.

I don't like Fenris' rivalmance either. I don't even really like his rivalry, but I can't be his friend without flagrantly deceiving him as to my intentions.



#486
In Exile

In Exile
  • Members
  • 28 738 messages

To each their own. I played the latter two enough that to me it works. Mostly it's the personality clash that gets me. Isabela seems to be under the impression that a rival Hawke has to be a hardass and boring because he/she rivaled her. That turned me right off.

You know...that's probably what primarily bothers me. The assumption about my Hawke's character because rivaling Isabela =! being a stick in the mud.



Isabella says that, but you prove her wrong with your hilarious repartee. The Act II questioning beliefs conversation (the burning orphanage line) is just absolutely priceless.

#487
Stronglav

Stronglav
  • Members
  • 438 messages

Female romances to everyone!!  :D



#488
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 423 messages

Well, I would hope that Anders wouldn't romance a templar shill, or Merrill an overbearing control freak, but none of the LIs seem all that smart about love. It helps that Hawke doesn't ever actually try to control Isabela even on rivalry, however. And Isabela seems annoyed at a rivaled Hawke solely because Hawke somehow makes her look bad, but she avoids trying to phrase it like that.

 

And where is Hawke boring and uptight?

 

 

There's no need to pretend that we're not longstanding enemies, fear not.

 

To each their own no? Isabela on the other hand...not so much.  As for not trying to control Isabela the ship incident can have Hawke make the decision for her. It just happens later than the other LIs.

 

Isabela calls Hawke as such in the whole saving burning orphanage conversation. (I think it's her act 2 questioning beliefs?). I did it a while ago I just remember being incredibly offputted by it.

 

*pats* I stuffed some poison ivy in your pack ^_^

 

 

That's strange - the rivalmance totally made sense to me: Hawke is trying to get her on the straight and narrow and by teaching her that she should care for her fellow person.

The Fenris rivalmance always made me uncomfortable.

 

You do the same on the rivalry though and at least her calling you boring doesn't sting as badly then :P

 

I like that about it? It's not perfectly healthy. I don't think it's supposed to be.

 

 

Isabella says that, but you prove her wrong with your hilarious repartee. The Act II questioning beliefs conversation (the burning orphanage line) is just absolutely priceless.

 

I guess my issue was I played either diplo or aggressive Hawke that playthrough then XD I don't remember the response being amusing.



#489
Who Knows

Who Knows
  • Members
  • 1 328 messages

I have a hard time believing Ander's rivalry romance too. The relationships in this game would really have benefitted from more nuance.



#490
In Exile

In Exile
  • Members
  • 28 738 messages

To each their own no? Isabela on the other hand...not so much. As for not trying to control Isabela the ship incident can have Hawke make the decision for her. It just happens later than the other LIs.

Isabela calls Hawke as such in the whole saving burning orphanage conversation. (I think it's her act 2 questioning beliefs?). I did it a while ago I just remember being incredibly offputted by it.

*pats* I stuffed some poison ivy in your pack ^_^



You do the same on the rivalry though and at least her calling you boring doesn't sting as badly then :P

I like that about it? It's not perfectly healthy. I don't think it's supposed to be.


With Fenris it just felt like I was victimising someone already victimized. I didn't so much mind the unhealthy aspect of (fictional) relationships generally, but when I start to feel a bit predatory I get uncomfortable.

#491
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 423 messages

I have a hard time believing Ander's rivalry romance too. The relationships in this game would really have benefitted from more nuance.

 

Agreed. And rivalry was mixed with too many douche canoe options.

 

I can see some of the douchecanoe options being acceptable (hell some of them were funny and harshly true) but some were just douchey and should've ended the romance.


  • Who Knows aime ceci

#492
Who Knows

Who Knows
  • Members
  • 1 328 messages


With Fenris it just felt like I was victimising someone already victimized. I didn't so much mind the unhealthy aspect of (fictional) relationships generally, but when I start to feel a bit predatory I get uncomfortable.

If you keep the rivalry points to just being anti-templar/circle, then I don't see Fenris being victimized particularly. Do you have a specific example? I was put off by how Fenris treated Hawke than the other way around.



#493
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 423 messages

With Fenris it just felt like I was victimising someone already victimized. I didn't so much mind the unhealthy aspect of (fictional) relationships generally, but when I start to feel a bit predatory I get uncomfortable.

 

Hm...I had the impression Fenris would've said something if he wasn't okay with it so I was fine with it. The most odd moment for me was the after Hadriana scene and that can be alleviated a bit with letting Fenris come back and pretty much start it.



#494
In Exile

In Exile
  • Members
  • 28 738 messages

If you keep the rivalry points to just being anti-templar/circle, then I don't see Fenris being victimized particularly. Do you have a specific example? I was put off by how Fenris treated Hawke than the other way around.


I saw Anders as the resident abuser. It may be that I romanced Fenris in an aggro Hawke play through, but to me it seemed that Hawke was the one basically pushing him around and twisting his buttons.

#495
Who Knows

Who Knows
  • Members
  • 1 328 messages

I saw Anders as the resident abuser. It may be that I romanced Fenris in an aggro Hawke play through, but to me it seemed that Hawke was the one basically pushing him around and twisting his buttons.

It seems probably that you played aggro Hawke. I've seen diplomatic Hawke doing the rivalry romance and s/he doesn't seem to say anything problematic (nothing that friendship Hawke doesn't).



#496
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 423 messages

I saw Anders as the resident abuser. It may be that I romanced Fenris in an aggro Hawke play through, but to me it seemed that Hawke was the one basically pushing him around and twisting his buttons.

 

Aggro Hawke does that to everyone.

 

Even the friendshipmances.

 

It's part of Aggro Hawke's charm :P

 

(Actually Aggro Hawke in a friendship mance with Fenris is amusing because of their mutual growling).



#497
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

Aggro Hawke does that to everyone.

 

Even the friendshipmances.

 

It's part of Aggro Hawke's charm :P

 

(Actually Aggro Hawke in a friendship mance with Fenris is amusing because of their mutual growling).

Aggressive Hawke in a friendship romance with Merrill is actually surprisingly sweet, primarily because she doesn't let Merrill put herself down.



#498
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 423 messages

Aggressive Hawke in a friendship romance with Merrill is actually surprisingly sweet, primarily because she doesn't let Merrill put herself down.

 

Oh that's nice ^_^ Aggressive Hawke does have soft moments in general but so much of it is douchecanoe it's kind of overpowering XD



#499
Aimi

Aimi
  • Members
  • 4 616 messages

To each their own no? Isabela on the other hand...not so much.  As for not trying to control Isabela the ship incident can have Hawke make the decision for her. It just happens later than the other LIs.
 
Isabela calls Hawke as such in the whole saving burning orphanage conversation. (I think it's her act 2 questioning beliefs?). I did it a while ago I just remember being incredibly offputted by it.


The "control Isabela" thing isn't even really about Isabela. For a diplo Hawke (for example), it can be that Castillon simply cannot be allowed to continue enslaving and killing people. Izzy is willing to allow this to continue to happen, but her reasoning doesn't make any sense at all: she assumes that he will honor a 'business arrangement' and that keeping him alive would be better publicity, somehow, than killing him. Hawke can even point out that Isabela could get a ship in plenty of other ways, and Izzy whines that those ships wouldn't feel as special as one won from Castillon without killing him.

Isabela demonstrates throughout the story that she doesn't particularly care if other people get hurt (or killed) because of what she does, so long as she's doing what she wants to do. Maintaining that illusion of total freedom and independence killed hundreds in the qunari invasion, and if Hawke lets Castillon go that number only rises. To me - and I confess that my favorite Hawke is a Izzy-rivalmancing Diplo female mage, so I am kind of invested in this - Isabela's potential return to Kirkwall at the end of Act 2 makes far more sense if she rivals Hawke than if they are friends. A friendly Hawke would only encourage the behavior that culminated in Isabela's departure: seeking freedom and independence, "looking out for number one", and forget the rest. A rival Hawke encourages the behavior that led Isabela back: a growing understanding that what she's done has hurt real people needlessly, and that she has to be responsible for helping to make it right.

I don't think that that makes rival Hawke a boring tightass stick in the mud. It's easy to see why Izzy would call Hawke that, but, y'know, sticks and stones.

And about that orphanage line: yeah, it is pretty funny. But, uh, Isabela was in Denerim during the events of Dragon Age: Origins. While she was hanging out at the Pearl, a few miles away Arl Howe's goons were murdering their way through...a burning orphanage. They killed so many elven kids that they practically sundered the Veil. I'm not suggesting that the line was meant as a direct reference, but it's a little close for comfort, no?
  • jlb524, In Exile, Cat Fancy et 5 autres aiment ceci

#500
CuriousArtemis

CuriousArtemis
  • Members
  • 19 656 messages

I do agree that is the best route. The thing I expect to miss out on, though, is the amount of reference to the genders involved that straight and gay love interests seem to get. Overall I think it's more important for everyone (well, monosexuals, bisexuals and so on get more options by default) to have equal choice, but it may be nice if the romances aren't too copy and paste with either gender.

 

Hmm I actually prefer to be treated the same no matter what my gender, but I could definitely live with that ^^