@CuriousArtemis: Oh, I'm a bigot, am I? Please, enlighten me: what exactly is it that makes me so? If you actually read my post you'd realise that I actually have no problem with gay people, I just find it a little strange that in a medieval setting there are so few people that do actually have a problem with them. Yes, I do realise Thedas is a fantasy world, so talk of realism might seem odd, but fantasy aspects are easy to accept because, well, they're fantasy (they don't exist, so they can't really be compared to the real world). However, gay people do exist, so with regards to realism I feel like it's okay to talk about them. Also, just because it's fantasy doesn't mean that it shouldn't have aspects of realism (you can only suspend your disbelief so much).
Am I 'bigoted' because I said that gays aren't normal? Nothing bigoted about that, I'm pretty much stating a fact. If something is 'normal' it conforms to a standard, it's typical, you expect it. Being straight, for example, is something that is normal; being gay isn't normal however because, well, it doesn't conform to a standard, it's unexpected. If you were to have a child, you would expect them to be straight because that's what the vast majority of people are, it would be unusual if they weren't.
Again, for the record, just because I'm saying being gay isn't normal doesn't mean I'm saying it's 'wrong' (of course it isn't). It just really irritates me when people continue to spread the false notion that being gay is normal (natural, yes, but certainly not normal); just because you exist, you happen to be gay, and there just happen to be other people just like you, doesn't necessarily mean that what you are is normal (plenty of paedophiles exist, too, but you certainly wouldn't say they are normal now, would you? And no, before you jump to conclusions, I'm not comparing/likening homosexuality to paedophilia, I'm just using it as an example of another type of attraction that also isn't normal).
If by 'normal' you mean 'acceptable' then yes being gay is normal in that sense; however I actually use the proper definition of words, therefore it's not 'normal' because it doesn't fit the definition of the word (this is something that you can't dispute, if you actually try to then you're deluded).
I've said my piece. If you still think I'm a bigot then that's your problem, I'm not going to continue arguing with you after if that's the case because I'd just be fighting a losing battle.