Aller au contenu

Photo

Orsino - the true bad egg of Kirkwall


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
231 réponses à ce sujet

#126
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 584 messages

Except Orsino isn't a Libertarian. He's not against the Chantry-controlled Circles -- only how Meredith is running the Circles -- and Elthina cites him as a reasonable man. If anything, he's a Lucrosian due to getting the Circles more moneyarrow-10x10.png or an Aequitarian. Or both.

 

He is not? His promotional quote has him speaking out against the imprisionment of mages as a principle; he steadfastly refuses to cooperate with Meredith going so far to enlist the aid of the Champion to conceal the activities of blood mages; he concealed himself the existence of a blood mage serial killer for a decade; he tries to have mobs tearing down the Gallows; he is a blood mage himself and, this sepculation, given the number of blood mages you fight if siding with the Templars, it is a reasonable assumption that he has been teaching others in secret for years, why else refuse to allow Meredith to search the Tower?
 



#127
Sifr

Sifr
  • Members
  • 6 763 messages

He is not? His promotional quote has him speaking out against the imprisionment of mages as a principle; he steadfastly refuses to cooperate with Meredith going so far to enlist the aid of the Champion to conceal the activities of blood mages; he concealed himself the existence of a blood mage serial killer for a decade; he tries to have mobs tearing down the Gallows; he is a blood mage himself and, this sepculation, given the number of blood mages you fight if siding with the Templars, it is a reasonable assumption that he has been teaching others in secret for years, why else refuse to allow Meredith to search the Tower?
 

 

Many mages balk at imprisonment, but that doesn't mean that he's necessarily in favour of tearing down the Circle violently, we saw that quite a number of mages in the Mage Rebellion wished for them to be reformed rather than being abolished entirely? If he was that much of an insurrectionist, why would he have been tolerated as the First Enchanter for so long?

 

The reason for him wishing to cover up the activities of the Blood Mages however needs to be seen in the context of the time it takes place in. The quest itself takes place in Act 3 where Meredith is going more and more tonto from the Lyrium Idol, has issued crackdowns and draconian punishments against any Mages (and Templars) who voice any kind of dissent and has wiped out the Mage Underground entirely. She's also busy tightening her grip on Kirkwall, to the extent that she's barring any new election of a new Viscount and is actively attempting to undermine Aveline's authority so she can seize control over the City Guards and have total dominance over the law in the city-state.

 

Any discovery of Blood Mages is going to cause the Templars to crack down even harder and prove Meredith's paranoia about blood mages around every corner correct, so is it any wonder that Orisino wants to avoid that kind of persecution and any more witch hunts? We saw how fast she was to issue Annulment after the Chantry explosion, despite Anders being a rogue apostate, because it doesn't matter to her who actually did the crime?

 

It's also unclear however whether or not that he knew about Quentin's activities, since Necromancy isn't technically a crime as the Mortalitasi are tolerated (barely) rather than having their practices outlawed across Thedas... so for all we know, Orsino believed he was trying to raise the dead, but wasn't aware how he was getting the cadavers and only found out he was killing people for his experiments afterwards?

 

As for his being a Blood Mage, all we know is that he was capable of turning a Harvester. While that's likely blood magic, we don't see any real evidence that he might have not been one beforehand? His familiarity with Quentin's research might seem damning on the surface, but it could have been academic curiosity on his part for why he got involved with him in the first place? It's not hard to imagine that the knowledge would have provided the means for him to animate the dead into a Harvester, allowing him to pull that feat off? All Varric says about Orsino's reasons for going crazy and turning into a monster is that "All I know is that he was desperate?"

 

While he might have been covering up Blood Mages in the Gallows, it's equally possible that he simply didn't want to give into her because he knew that if he let Meredith have an inch, she'd take a mile.

 

(Not that I'm being an apologist, just playing Devil's Advocate since Orsino's motivations are left ambiguous)


  • Exile Isan, TEWR, dragonflight288 et 2 autres aiment ceci

#128
KaiserShep

KaiserShep
  • Members
  • 23 805 messages

He is not? His promotional quote has him speaking out against the imprisionment of mages as a principle; he steadfastly refuses to cooperate with Meredith going so far to enlist the aid of the Champion to conceal the activities of blood mages; he concealed himself the existence of a blood mage serial killer for a decade; he tries to have mobs tearing down the Gallows; he is a blood mage himself and, this sepculation, given the number of blood mages you fight if siding with the Templars, it is a reasonable assumption that he has been teaching others in secret for years, why else refuse to allow Meredith to search the Tower?
 

 

Orsino does not enlist the Champion's aid to conceal the activities of bloodmages, but rather to uncover a possible conspiracy against the Circle. Meredith will send the Champion to do the exact same thing if you side with the Templars instead. Also, unless I'm mistaken, the only bloodmages you encounter are Grace and Alain, the latter of which never fights you.



#129
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 584 messages

Orsino does not enlist the Champion's aid to conceal the activities of bloodmages, but rather to uncover a possible conspiracy against the Circle. Meredith will send the Champion to do the exact same thing if you side with the Templars instead. Also, unless I'm mistaken, the only bloodmages you encounter are Grace and Alain, the latter of which never fights you.

 

I do not have a DA2 save right now so, I can't confirm it, but I am reasonably sure that, if you choose the right dialogue options, he will ask you to, if there are blood mages, remove them quietly.

I distinctly remember posting a youtube video that proved it years ago. Unfortunately, I can't find it now.
 



#130
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 584 messages

Many mages balk at imprisonment, but that doesn't mean that he's necessarily in favour of tearing down the Circle violently, we saw that quite a number of mages in the Mage Rebellion wished for them to be reformed rather than being abolished entirely? If he was that much of an insurrectionist, why would he have been tolerated as the First Enchanter for so long?

However, if you'd argue that Orsino objected only to Meredith's draconian method rather than Chantry policed Circles as a whole, then you'd think he would attack Meredith's measures. Instead, he refers to keeping mages in the Circle which is the cornerstone of Chantry control.

 

 

The reason for him wishing to cover up the activities of the Blood Mages however needs to be seen in the context of the time it takes place in. The quest itself takes place in Act 3 where Meredith is going more and more tonto from the Lyrium Idol, has issued crackdowns and draconian punishments against any Mages (and Templars) who voice any kind of dissent and has wiped out the Mage Underground entirely. She's also busy tightening her grip on Kirkwall, to the extent that she's barring any new election of a new Viscount and is actively attempting to undermine Aveline's authority so she can seize control over the City Guards and have total dominance over the law in the city-state.

 

Any discovery of Blood Mages is going to cause the Templars to crack down even harder and prove Meredith's paranoia about blood mages around every corner correct, so is it any wonder that Orisino wants to avoid that kind of persecution and any more witch hunts? We saw how fast she was to issue Annulment after the Chantry explosion, despite Anders being a rogue apostate, because it doesn't matter to her who actually did the crime?

I'm not saying that, from his perspective, there weren't reasons to be concerned.

But it doesn't look good if a supposedly reasonable First Enchanter who is not against the Circle is helping conceal blood mages because he is afraid of bad pr.

Maybe he should admit Meredith has a point and there is a problem.

 

It's also unclear however whether or not that he knew about Quentin's activities, since Necromancy isn't technically a crime as the Mortalitasi are tolerated (barely) rather than having their practices outlawed across Thedas... so for all we know, Orsino believed he was trying to raise the dead, but wasn't aware how he was getting the cadavers and only found out he was killing people for his experiments afterwards?

If he was not aware of the nature of Quentin's experiments, then he is guilty of aiding an apostate to stay hidden from the Circle. Again, not something you'd see from a First Enchanter who, supposedly, is for the Circle.

 

But considering that he was aware it would give Meredith ammunition, chances are he knew at least something of what Quentin was doing.

 

As for his being a Blood Mage, all we know is that he was capable of turning a Harvester. While that's likely blood magic, we don't see any real evidence that he might have not been one beforehand? His familiarity with Quentin's research might seem damning on the surface, but it could have been academic curiosity on his part for why he got involved with him in the first place? It's not hard to imagine that the knowledge would have provided the means for him to animate the dead into a Harvester, allowing him to pull that feat off? All Varric says about Orsino's reasons for going crazy and turning into a monster is that "All I know is that he was desperate?"

 

While he might have been covering up Blood Mages in the Gallows, it's equally possible that he simply didn't want to give into her because he knew that if he let Meredith have an inch, she'd take a mile.

 

(Not that I'm being an apologist, just playing Devil's Advocate since Orsino's motivations are left ambiguous)

In order for him to have performed that spell flawlessly, he had to have been practicing for some time.

 

Now, this is all speculation but take this into consideration.

Meredith demands to search the tower, Orsino refuses. I suppose it's not unresonable for someone to deny a search on their home. However, after having been there, he is suddenly willing to let Meredith search it.

One could claim it was because suddenly they were faced with the Right of Annulment and thus, one search wasn't all that daunting anymore but then, why didn't he offer it in Lowtown? Why only at the Gallows, once he has been there himself?
 

Then there is the fact that, if you side with the Templars, you encounter many mages capable of summoning and controlling demons in the Gallows. Now, there is no way they learned that in half a night. Just like there is no way Orsino created an Harvester on the first try without ever having used blood magic before, never mind that particular spell.

 

It seems to me that Orsino studied Quentin's research and practiced blood magic. Then, he taught it to some mages he trusted. When Meredith demanded to search the Circle, he panicked and rushed to Elthina so she would stop it.

Once Anders had destroyed the Chantry, he fled to the Circle and concealed the evidence. and, after Meredith arrived, he was willing to let her search the Tower, knowing she wouldn't find anything any longer, in return for having the Annulment called off.

 



#131
springacres

springacres
  • Members
  • 870 messages

The situation with Orsino at the end of Act 3 is definitely one of the more WTF? moments of the whole game.  Here's someone who seems reasonable when we first meet him at the end of Act 2 (I know he appears in Night Terrors, but not for long enough to get a sense of his personality) and yet by the final battle of Act 3, he's gone as crazy as Anders.  I suppose an argument could be made that he was fighting for his own life and only gave in after he realized everything was lost, but it's still hard to reconcile with what (little) else we know about his character.  I hope World of Thedas vol. 2 has some more answers for us.



#132
thesuperdarkone2

thesuperdarkone2
  • Members
  • 2 974 messages

The situation with Orsino at the end of Act 3 is definitely one of the more WTF? moments of the whole game.  Here's someone who seems reasonable when we first meet him at the end of Act 2 (I know he appears in Night Terrors, but not for long enough to get a sense of his personality) and yet by the final battle of Act 3, he's gone as crazy as Anders.  I suppose an argument could be made that he was fighting for his own life and only gave in after he realized everything was lost, but it's still hard to reconcile with what (little) else we know about his character.  I hope World of Thedas vol. 2 has some more answers for us.

There is a simple answer: bad writing. The devs have outright said you weren't supposed to fight Orsino if you sided with the mages but there weren't enough bosses in the mage ending so they decided to have Orsino do a 180 from "With you on our side, there is hope" to "THERE IS NO HOPE!! LOL NOW I'M THE BOSS FROM THAT DLC LOL!!1" after one fight.


  • Exile Isan, dragonflight288, Dabrikishaw et 2 autres aiment ceci

#133
springacres

springacres
  • Members
  • 870 messages

There is a simple answer: bad writing. The devs have outright said you weren't supposed to fight Orsino if you sided with the mages but there weren't enough bosses in the mage ending so they decided to have Orsino do a 180 from "With you on our side, there is hope" to "THERE IS NO HOPE!! LOL NOW I'M THE BOSS FROM THAT DLC LOL!!1" after one fight.

I know that (saw it on the first page of this thread actually).  Which makes this even worse, because the writing in that scene is SO bad that (as I stated above) there is no way to explain his sudden transformation that makes any sense whatsoever.  Even MisterJB's theory that he was tutoring blood mages in secret doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me, given Meredith's crackdown and Orsino's already tenuous position at the end of Act 2 during the confrontation with the Qunari.


  • dragonflight288 aime ceci

#134
LightningSamus

LightningSamus
  • Members
  • 476 messages
Still Anders is to blame too, terrorist killed innocent people in the chantry just to make a point which led to mage rebellion and blood magic and demons summoned in the streets attacking everyone.

I hope there is a DLC where if he survived then you capture him and judge him, he should not get an easy death though.

#135
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

He is not? His promotional quote has him speaking out against the imprisionment of mages as a principle; he steadfastly refuses to cooperate with Meredith going so far to enlist the aid of the Champion to conceal the activities of blood mages; he concealed himself the existence of a blood mage serial killer for a decade; he tries to have mobs tearing down the Gallows; he is a blood mage himself and, this sepculation, given the number of blood mages you fight if siding with the Templars, it is a reasonable assumption that he has been teaching others in secret for years, why else refuse to allow Meredith to search the Tower?
 

 

And you think his quote couldn't simply be in reference to Meredith? Considering the Samson short story said most Mages would be locked in their cells for an entire day every day I think it's pretty clear he's talking about how Meredith treats the Mages, not the Circle as an institution. That same short story talks of how the Templars in Kirkwall were rotten to the core, which makes sense because it's canon that Meredith promotes extremists to positions of authority.

 

She tasked Ser Mettin with leading a group of Templars meant to purge mage sympathizers from the city (although it's a crime, it is NOT one punishable by death). That same quest has Mettin try to attack us simply for being in the same area. Us, the Champion of Kirkwall and friends, which he wouldn't do if he knew his actions were legal, but would if he knew they were illegal and he didn't want witnesses to the crime. Not at all unlike issues of police brutality in our world.

 

Karras is explicitly referred to as a great crony of hers. Cullen's codex says Meredith promoted him because his harsh views were in line with hers. She tasked a Templar that brutalized a Dalish child to get Feynriel back.

 

He doesn't call on Hawke to conceal the activities of Grace. He calls on Hawke to find out precisely what is happening, because Meredith forbade him from going further then the courtyard. He doesn't know what's happening precisely, but he's found out enough for us to draw a lead on. He knows a meeting is happening in Hightown. He knows his charges have disappeared for days at a time. I notice you don't mention how Meredith's Templars allowing such things to happen demonstrates their incompetence. I'm not talking about the ones aiding the rebellion (whom are justified), but rather the others. The ones loyal to Meredith.

 

That they don't notice strikes me as rather a mark against them.

 

He doesn't know if his charges are fleeing the Circle to betray it or simply to rebel against the harsh restrictions placed upon them, saying and I quote:

 

"I would rather not deny my Mages what small freedoms they can find." and "I don't know if they seek congress with demons or merely a walk in the moonlight."

 

And if you confront him on how fear of blood magic is no reason to not go to the Templars he doesn't say that he's against going to the Templars on principle. What he says is that he can't go to the Templars without names because it would make every mage a target.

 

What he wants is sufficient information to go to the Templars that they can do their duty without punishing every Mage for it.

 

 

he tries to have mobs tearing down the Gallows

 

Not really, no. He tries to get the people to simply not accept Meredith's illegal usurpation of power. Mobs tearing down the Gallows isn't precisely how it would play out (and it would honestly be a stupid way to go about it. Ser Marlein had the right of it).

 

You know what? It'd be simply easier to repost the Orsino crap I put on my tumblr.
 

 

Said HERE

 

Because he didn’t support how Quentin was going about doing it. That letter, which many people tout off as being “proof positive” actually does not go into sufficient detail as to what was shown off in the report Quentin sent off to Orsino, but I’m positive it wasn’t him condoning the Harvester thing given how horrified he was by it and how he put it off to the side.

 

Beyond that, Orsino is not unreasonable. He is not against working with the Templars, but rather against working with Meredith the Mad. He would’ve gladly gone to the Templars with information on Quentin, if undeserved retribution wasn’t in the cards. Meredith would’ve punished all of the mages for the actions of Quentin, if not used it as reason to institute an RoA.

 

He also makes it a point to help Feynriel, takes out an entire group of Qunari with ease, mentors Bethany and heals her, and fights for his people.

 

He fights against Meredith’s illegal usurpation of power that runs completely counter to Chantry stance, which is that Templars cannot hold worldly power. Irminric gave up his rights to the lands of his noble ancestors, while in Dawn of the Seeker a high ranking priest and Templar worked together to put Templars in positions of political power.

 

Not to mention of course the problems associated with condemning an entire group of people to death for the actions of one man, on the basis of “The people will demand blood!” like Meredith gives off. Really? Isn’t the entire point of the Templars to protect the people from the dangers of magic and the mages from the ire of the people?

 

And it’s also politically stupid to give in to the whims of a mob (let’s ignore the fact that we don’t even see evidence of one forming at all).

And even when **** hits the fan, when he sees how far Meredith is willing to go, he still makes an effort to work with her saying that she can gladly lock them up and search the Gallows and, if she wanted it, he’d even help her. HE tried to go for diplomacy, while Meredith went straight for the sword.

 

Yes, Orsino helped Quentin, but the moment he discovered what Quentin was precisely doing, he cut off all ties. But he could not go to the Templars and as such was caught between a rock and a hard place.

 

 

And also...

 

 

 

Said HERE

 

Being an Elf is hard. Being a Mage is hard. Being both in a Circle is doubly hard. Wrap all that together into being put in a Circle run by Meredith the Mad, who actively promotes extremists to positions of authority (Cullen, Alrik, Karras, Mettin, etc.), and the extremists (not necessarily the ones named) will drag an Elf away in chains from his wife and never let him see her ever (Huon) or torture a Dalish child with fire (if Feynriel goes to the Dalish) and you can see just how precarious his situation truly is.

 

And yet he never backed down. He never stopped fighting for his people. He kept on speaking out against Kirkwall’s injustices since 9:29 Dragon (though he was FE three years earlier), hoping that change could come. If he was silenced, it only showed his point. He didn’t fear death. He feared failing his people. And Meredith’s measures were counter-productive. She would take away the staves and books of the mages, rendering them incapable of learning to defend themselves properly from Demons.

 

To say nothing of the flagrant abuse of authority Alrik committed, which could not have failed to have been noticed by Orsino or Meredith – considering the RoT requires the signature/approval of both the FE and KC, per Origins. Orsino would’ve spoken up about this certainly, but it wouldn’t matter.

 

He even took it upon himself to try and heal Feynriel when he fell into a coma, and I take that as a sign that he was personally mentoring him. He mentors Bethany too, and dialogue implies he’s of the Lucrosian fraternity – which is realistically the most dangerous fraternity to the Chantry’s power, but also the best one to be a part of. But he’s never once been of the mind he shouldn’t be working with the Templars. He’s been called a reasonable man by Elthina and says he’d go to the Templars for help. Kirkwall’s Circle was once a good place before Meredith

 

I don’t mind him having a connection to Quentin, as he was put between a rock and a hard place and it had potential. He didn’t know the extent of Quentin’s atrocities until it was too late, until word had spread of a serial killer in Kirkwall (the Quentin arc has some problems in its writing though), but he never sanctioned what he was doing. He never knew what the man was doing until Quentin sent him the Harvester ritual, at which point he just cast it aside, remorseful of everything. He wanted Quentin to be dealt with, but because of the nature of the Circle he lives in he couldn’t go to Meredith with the information. At best she wouldn’t believe him, at worst she’d demand to know how he knows so much and use it as a means to call for the RoA.

 

And even when it happened, when the RoA was called for, he was willing to work with her still. He would gladly have had his charges kept in their cells while the Templars searched the tower and offered to help, if she wanted it, so long as they weren’t killed for Anders’ acts. He went for diplomacy throughout The Last Straw whereas Meredith went straight for the sword.

 

And I don’t mind the concept of the Harvester battle, as it happens in my universe. It just happens through a Pride or Despair Demon coming through the swiss-cheese Veil, saying “Here’s Johnny!!” and possessing a corpse, then doing the ritual, and Orsino recognizes what’s happening and fights against it. =P

 

But Orsino’s fate? It was just uncalled for, what happened, and poorly written to convey desperation (if he was to use blood magic at all). He was never a supporter of blood magic (not even that letter has him supporting blood magic. People use Quentin’s status as a blood mage and what we learn later to say Orsino supported blood magic as well, but it barely says anything). He called it “dark arts” and views it as evil (or at least counter-productive). Certainly, if he was to use BM, it wouldn’t be that far.

 

And I reject his fate and have him alive in my headcanon, helping Fiona run the Mage rebellion, helping spread the word of what really happened and Tobias Hawke’s actions to help the Mages.

 

It is absolutely unfair to hold Orsino to the same standard as say, someone like Irving, without accounting for the fact that as an Elf Orsino's position within the Kirkwall Circle -- a haven for extremists who have demonstrated racist mentalities -- puts him in a more precarious place, more so without accounting for how Meredith continuously kept Orsino from being fuckin' able to do his job. And then she has the balls to order him to provide her with accounts of information on a conspiracy he knows nothing about because Meredith has continuously restricted just what Orsino can do, his every action scrutinized and looked at as suspicious.

 

Orsino can't even take a ****** without Meredith popping up in the chamberpot and accusing him of using blood magic.

 

And anyone who doesn't think there'd be racism in the Circles isn't seeing things clearly at all. It's something Duncan will probe a Surana on in the most lenient Circle out there, to which you can say that yeah you do face some.

 

You also fail to mention the good things Orsino does, which is stand up for his people, heal Feynriel, mentor Bethany, decide to fight against the Qunari because he considers Kirkwall his home, etc.

 

Orsino is not defined solely by the things you mentioned, of which you don't necessarily give the full accounting of. You see something, but you don't see the whole picture behind it. It's like Loghain and the slavery thing. Yes, it was criminal and he should be held accountable for it, but there is more to why it happened then simply "Well I'll sell me some Elves because why not."



#136
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

I do not have a DA2 save right now so, I can't confirm it, but I am reasonably sure that, if you choose the right dialogue options, he will ask you to, if there are blood mages, remove them quietly.

I distinctly remember posting a youtube video that proved it years ago. Unfortunately, I can't find it now.
 

 

What he says is not to do anything against the Mages if they don't do anything first.

 

Meaning don't go off half-cocked and attack the mages. If they attack you first then sure defend yourself, but otherwise don't attack them.

 

The narrative of that quest admittedly didn't help, given that it has this conspiracy as not trusting Orsino, but the game had Thrask agreeing with the First Enchanter earlier if talked to in the Gallows, mentioning how he knows we're siding with Orsino, but then when we confront him go "I dunno why you're supporting Meredith dude".

 

It's clear it was written from a pro-Templar point of view, as that's the only way the quest, as written, makes sense.

 

If he was not aware of the nature of Quentin's experiments, then he is guilty of aiding an apostate to stay hidden from the Circle. Again, not something you'd see from a First Enchanter who, supposedly, is for the Circle.

 

But considering that he was aware it would give Meredith ammunition, chances are he knew at least something of what Quentin was doing.

 

 

 

You do realize that once he became aware of what Quentin was doing, which he admits happened far too late, anyone with a brain would know that the Templars would react to it and use it as ammunition?

 

Like, goddamn man, knowing it's ammunition doesn't mean he knew what was happening all along in explicit detail, much less had an inkling of the horrors being done. What it means is that Orsino, after finding out precisely what Quentin was doing, recognized that Meredith would have more ammunition against the Circle if she knew of their connection.

 

I have some ideas of just how Quentin was going about sending **** to Orsino, but I can be sure that he wasn't all "LOL I've been taking body parts from people and binding Demons to them or trinkets belonging to them" because ****... that would've alienated Orsino from his side, not kept him there.



#137
andy6915

andy6915
  • Members
  • 6 590 messages

Not really, no. He tries to get the people to simply not accept Meredith's illegal usurpation of power. Mobs tearing down the Gallows isn't precisely how it would play out (and it would honestly be a stupid way to go about it. Ser Marlein had the right of it).

 

Indeed. JB as usual tries to almost seemingly tries to take the worst possible interpretation in the face of any reading comprehension or logic. I played through DA2 completely through just a week or 2 ago, so it's still fresh. It was clear that he was attempting to get the nobility and powerful people of the city to force her to stop  blocking attempts to get a viscount. Which he should do since what she was doing was BLATANTLY illegal, Templars as an organization are not supposed to be city rulers by any stretch. Even the seat of the Chantry's power in Orlais doesn't have a Templar in their emperor/empress seat, because it's not supposed to be done. To do so is theocratic, which the Chantry has no precedent for doing and in fact flies in the face of Chantry law. This is why even my pro-Templar Hawke's always tell Meredith to step down, because being for the Templars doesn't mean being okay when the Templars break their own laws... Especially when the way they're breaking laws is affecting everyone in the city, not just mages. Fact is that Meredith was breaking the laws and Orisino was actually in the bounds of the law for that public address to the nobility.


  • Exile Isan, TEWR et dragonflight288 aiment ceci

#138
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

 

This is why even my pro-Templar Hawke's always tell Meredith to step down, because being for the Templars doesn't mean being okay when the Templars break their own laws... Especially when the way they're breaking laws is affecting everyone in the city, not just mages. Fact is that Meredith was breaking the laws and Orisino was actually in the bounds of the law for that public address to the nobility.

 

I agree with everything you said, this especially. I too also have DAII fresh in my mind so this just made me go YES.

 

It's no different then saying that cops in our world need to come out against other cops when those ones do **** that's illegal. The Templars need accountability, which they do not get in the current system, and one of Lambert's faults is that he didn't address it.

 

EDIT: mixup with my words changing the meaning.



#139
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

 

(I know he appears in Night Terrors, but not for long enough to get a sense of his personality

 

Well, that was Hawke (you don't need me to tell you that, I'm sure) but we can extrapolate that from Feynriel's recognition of what the "First Enchanter" was telling him and how it struck a chord with him, that Feynriel was taught that his powers did not give him the right to dominate people, that he should always be wary of his intentions.

 

From that brief moment where Hawke acts as Orsino and doesn't screw the pooch, so to speak, we get a sense of how Orsino teaches his pupils.



#140
ShadowLordXII

ShadowLordXII
  • Members
  • 1 235 messages

Indeed. JB as usual tries to almost seemingly tries to take the worst possible interpretation in the face of any reading comprehension or logic. I played through DA2 completely through just a week or 2 ago, so it's still fresh. It was clear that he was attempting to get the nobility and powerful people of the city to force her to stop  blocking attempts to get a viscount. Which he should do since what she was doing was BLATANTLY illegal, Templars as an organization are not supposed to be city rulers by any stretch. Even the seat of the Chantry's power in Orlais doesn't have a Templar in their emperor/empress seat, because it's not supposed to be done. To do so is theocratic, which the Chantry has no precedent for doing and in fact flies in the face of Chantry law. This is why even my pro-Templar Hawke's always tell Meredith to step down, because being for the Templars doesn't mean being okay when the Templars break their own laws... Especially when the way they're breaking laws is affecting everyone in the city, not just mages. Fact is that Meredith was breaking the laws and Orisino was actually in the bounds of the law for that public address to the nobility.

 

It's really surprising that Meredith was even allowed to takeover Kirkwall like that.

 

Hell, when Justinia actually sent an agent, it was to warn Elthina that the Chantry was about to launch an Exalted March on Kirkwall because of the mages. No mention is ever made about Meredith seizing power.

 

Though Lambert may have had a hand in matters...



#141
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

To be honest, there is a large degree of clumsy writing on Bioware's part in the whole entire mess.

 

Long-term planning isn't something Bioware's good at.



#142
andy6915

andy6915
  • Members
  • 6 590 messages
Though Lambert may have had a hand in matters...

 

It's more than a "may".



#143
ShadowLordXII

ShadowLordXII
  • Members
  • 1 235 messages

It's more than a "may".

 

In Kirkwalls situation?

 

I know that Lambert helped escalate the war after Kirkwall, but I haven't seen/read anything indicating that he was involved with Kirkwall.

 

Then again, considering how no one in the Chantry calls out Meredith for illegally seizing power and preventing elections, it's pretty likely that Lambert vouched for Meredith as Lord Seeker. (Lambert is a slightly less extremist than Meredith, so I gather that they'd see eye to eye on a lot)



#144
andy6915

andy6915
  • Members
  • 6 590 messages

In Kirkwalls situation?

 

I know that Lambert helped escalate the war after Kirkwall, but I haven't seen/read anything indicating that he was involved with Kirkwall.

 

Then again, considering how no one in the Chantry calls out Meredith for illegally seizing power and preventing elections, it's pretty likely that Lambert vouched for Meredith as Lord Seeker. (Lambert is a slightly less extremist than Meredith, so I gather that they'd see eye to eye on a lot)

 

Doesn't Cassandra in a personal conversation with the Inquisitor say that Lambert knew about Meredith but specifically covered it up so no one could find out what she was doing? I recall something like that.

 

Anyone else recall that, or am I mistaken?



#145
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

I recall something along the lines of them hearing reports about Meredith's draconian measures, but they didn't respond to it because they figured it was justified due to "lol blood mages everywhere", not realizing that was actually causing the blood mages in the first place.

 

Still doesn't excuse Leliana's incompetence on the matter or the fact that Bioware's writing is clumsy as all hell though.



#146
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 584 messages

Indeed. JB as usual tries to almost seemingly tries to take the worst possible interpretation in the face of any reading comprehension or logic. I played through DA2 completely through just a week or 2 ago, so it's still fresh. It was clear that he was attempting to get the nobility and powerful people of the city to force her to stop  blocking attempts to get a viscount. Which he should do since what she was doing was BLATANTLY illegal, Templars as an organization are not supposed to be city rulers by any stretch. Even the seat of the Chantry's power in Orlais doesn't have a Templar in their emperor/empress seat, because it's not supposed to be done. To do so is theocratic, which the Chantry has no precedent for doing and in fact flies in the face of Chantry law. This is why even my pro-Templar Hawke's always tell Meredith to step down, because being for the Templars doesn't mean being okay when the Templars break their own laws... Especially when the way they're breaking laws is affecting everyone in the city, not just mages. Fact is that Meredith was breaking the laws and Orisino was actually in the bounds of the law for that public address to the nobility.

 

Ironically enough, I agree, in part.

My Main and Pro-Templar Hawke also chooses the "The First Enchanter is right, you should not be ruling the city." option because it, plain simply, is not her place.

I understand that there existed the threat of chaos with the seat of power empty but, were I Knight-Commander, I would have used the Templars to keep the armies of nobility apart until they could settle upon a new dinasty. I would have not stepped in the Viscount's seat.

 

I just don't think Orsino's intentions were altruistic. He is clearly trying to use the nobility and people of the city against Meredith.
 

 
 
 


#147
andy6915

andy6915
  • Members
  • 6 590 messages
He is clearly trying to use the nobility and people of the city against Meredith.

 

Uh... Yeah, that's kinda the point. She's breaking Chantry law and standing in the way of the city being functional, I would call that the exact perfect context of which to get people in power to stop such a person.


  • TEWR aime ceci

#148
ShadowLordXII

ShadowLordXII
  • Members
  • 1 235 messages

I recall something along the lines of them hearing reports about Meredith's draconian measures, but they didn't respond to it because they figured it was justified due to "lol blood mages everywhere", not realizing that was actually causing the blood mages in the first place.

 

Still doesn't excuse Leliana's incompetence on the matter or the fact that Bioware's writing is clumsy as all hell though.

 

It's DA2...clumsy writing and bad execution was all over that game's story. (it was rushed after all)

 

The "Blood mages everywhere" angle still doesn't quite work seeing as that Meredith is disrupting public order and the legal process of a secular city. And guess what? In 3 years, Meredith's methods hadn't helped the situation, they only made things worst.

 

Lambert must have had a lot of influence or else Justinia was blind/powerless concerning Kirkwall which doesn't bode well for her capabilities.



#149
andy6915

andy6915
  • Members
  • 6 590 messages
Lambert must have had a lot of influence or else Justinia was blind/powerless concerning Kirkwall which doesn't bode well for her capabilities.

 

Well... "Didn't bode well" would be the proper way to say it, since her being alive is a past-tense thing as of DAI.



#150
dragonflight288

dragonflight288
  • Members
  • 8 852 messages

In Kirkwalls situation?

 

I know that Lambert helped escalate the war after Kirkwall, but I haven't seen/read anything indicating that he was involved with Kirkwall.

 

Then again, considering how no one in the Chantry calls out Meredith for illegally seizing power and preventing elections, it's pretty likely that Lambert vouched for Meredith as Lord Seeker. (Lambert is a slightly less extremist than Meredith, so I gather that they'd see eye to eye on a lot)

 

Cassandra in Inquisition says that the Seekers investigated Kirkwall and declared Meredith justified because of how many cases of magical corruption.

 

Lambert is the head of the Seekers during the time of DA2, so in essence what it was was Lambert giving the "okay" for Meredith to do what she did, while Cassandra says she wanted to go to the root causes of the problems and solve those directly.