A question for you savvy PC folks: Is a GeForce GT 650 card within mimimum spec for DA:I?
Yes, although you're probably gonna play it at low settings.
A question for you savvy PC folks: Is a GeForce GT 650 card within mimimum spec for DA:I?
Yes, although you're probably gonna play it at low settings.
Totally not really happy with the PC UI. Maybe get rid of that terrible opaque dock and it should be fine. Still I don't understand why the health bar is taking up so much space. Should have incorporated with the round avatar. The grey and black modern icons are just terrible and out of place. But they should have just gone with the old school UI.

If someone could give me a little help I will worship the ground you walk upon! I'm super Tech stupid and looking at the requirements makes me go DUH! I think my PC meets the minimum requirements but I'm not 100% sure.
Here are my specs:
Windows 8.1
Processor AMD A10-5745M APU with Radeon HD Graphics
2.10 GHz
RAM 6.00 GB
64-bit Operating System, x64 based processor
I have a i5 2500k 3.30 ghz and I am going to get 980 gtx is the proccesor ok? Can someone please tell me
Easily, the 2500k will go to 3.7GHz on its own if it needs it. But it won't with the 980 doing the heavy lifting,
I can run it at recommended!
THIS! WOOT!
I need a gif of like, I dunno. Tom Hiddleston doing a happy dance or something. Anyone have one? lol
I have a i5 2500k 3.30 ghz and I am going to get 980 gtx is the proccesor ok? Can someone please tell me
Yes, it's a quad core Intel running at over 3.0 GHz.
You're golden, Pony Boy.
Guest_TrillClinton_*
So relieved I have 16 gigs of RAM. That should compensate for the one gig ATI 6970 card I have. If I can run the game at medium settings I'll be happy.
This is interesting. Can you switch around video memory and main memory? My understanding is that main memory handles the address space of the application while VRAM contains data to be rendered to the screen. I am just asking if it is possible and I hope my tone does not come out condescending.
Guest_E-Ro_*
Ultra 1440p here I come! Im so freaking excited!
The move from 24" to 30" is akin to your first experience with boobies.
I guess my question got drowned by too much traffic, but since you appear to have experience with 30" monitors: what kind of GPU and VRAM would you need to run DAI at 2560x1600 at highest settings? The specs list doesn't say which resolution they use.
So you're not sure how to react, and you need prompting to do it right?
exactly ![]()
W7 64 bit
i5-3450 @ 3.10 GHz
RAM: 8 GB
AMD Radeon HD 7850 1Go > Might want to change that but I want to change my display first (I have been running an old 22" on 1650X1050 since 2008!).
Plenty of disk space on my SSD
Which country are you buying in, what's your budget, and are you willing to assemble it yourself or know someone who will do it for pizza and beer?
UK, depends on how much the cost is going to be and if I can buy it preassembled? ![]()
Well after I get my 770 2gb overclock edition to an 970 overclock should be good to guy full graphics.
If someone could give me a little help I will worship the ground you walk upon! I'm super Tech stupid and looking at the requirements makes me go DUH! I think my PC meets the minimum requirements but I'm not 100% sure.
Here are my specs:
Windows 8.1
Processor AMD A10-5745M APU with Radeon HD Graphics
2.10 GHz
RAM 6.00 GB
64-bit Operating System, x64 based processor
I think it should be no problem, i'm not toally shure but I see there no problem...
I guess my question got drowned by too much traffic, but since you appear to have experience with 30" monitors: what kind of GPU and VRAM would you need to run DAI at 2560x1600 at highest settings? The specs list doesn't say which resolution they use.
At least 4GB VRAM and if you want 60fps, you need dual card in SLI or CrossFire. GTX980/970, AMD R9 290/290x
So, if I understood correctly, the reqs are basically the same as Battlefield 4's. I wonder if I should get BF4 to test how my computer fares...
With the use of the test program 3dmark, i was able with my new gtx 980, 3 year old i7 cpu and 16gb ram to score 92% better then most results, and 10% better of what is rated as a high end gaming pc.
Max graphics, here i come ![]()
This is interesting. Can you switch around video memory and main memory? My understanding is that main memory handles the address space of the application while VRAM contains data to be rendered to the screen. I am just asking if it is possible and I hope my tone does not come out condescending.
Video RAM cannot be substituted with regular RAM.
Well after I get my 770 2gb overclock edition to an 970 overclock should be good to guy full graphics.
GTX970 is no joke one hell of a beast. It beats R9 290 in terms of power consumption and having the same performance. I tested it on Crysis 3 1440p.
Guest_TrillClinton_*
Video RAM cannot be substituted with regular RAM.
Oh I know but I thought they was some caching or paging algorithm I didn't know about.
Guest_E-Ro_*
Pretty much yeah. People have been saying bf4 would be a good indicator of pc performance for a few weeks.So, if I understood correctly, the reqs are basically the same as Battlefield 4's. I wonder if I should get BF4 to test how my computer fares...
GTX970 is no joke one hell of a beast. It beats R9 290 in terms of power consumption and having the same performance. I tested it on Crysis 3 1440p.
And uses less pins then my current card does to from my understanding of specs, so will be good all around compared to my current asus 770 card. I hate fan noise so going with the asus version of the 970
That's....not how VRAM vs system RAM works.
Doesn't matter. I can still run the game and thats all that matters to me. ![]()
Hmm. For me all other requierments are covered as recommended, but I have a Sapphihre Radeon HD 7870, 2GB. I´m confused...also, even more scared about the Wild Hunt recommended specs, heh.
At least 4GB VRAM and if you want 60fps, you need dual card in SLI or CrossFire. GTX980/970, AMD R9 290/290x
Thanks. Worth trying I guess. I don't have a second 970, but I also don't absolutely need 60fps. If only the damned 16:10 monitors didn't put me back almost double that of their 16:9 equivalents at 2560:1440.