Aller au contenu

Photo

Dragon Age: Inquisition PC Screenshots, System Requirements and Hands-On!


1427 réponses à ce sujet

#651
DragonAgeLegend

DragonAgeLegend
  • Members
  • 1 071 messages

Can I ask you a question, guys?  

Does it support Windows 7 32 bit as this point seems to be unclear in system spec page.

 

Thanks

I'm not sure but I assume so for the minimum requirements, especially since it also says 4GB of RAM. 



#652
Amphibian

Amphibian
  • Members
  • 43 messages

Hmm, I have a feeling I may need to tone down some graphic settings to run this smoothly on my 1440p screen.

 

i5 3570k

16 GB

GTX 780 3 GB

 

I need to test how BF4 runs on my PC.  :P



#653
Unato

Unato
  • Members
  • 1 267 messages

Unfortunately, I'm in Australia, so any of those decent cards are priced around $300-$400 price range. Not a big deal, it'd just be nicer if they were cheaper :P
 

 

to be fair you do meet the min spec. but you should be able to buy a 7xx series card for sub 400 dollars (or a 970  for about 500). largely depending where you live and thus where you buy from (MSY, pcasegear etc)


  • Typhrus aime ceci

#654
Avoozl

Avoozl
  • Members
  • 25 messages

I'm having no luck finding confirmation through my searching of the forum..

 

Am I right to assume that 32bit Windows 7 is going to be a problem simply because it's 32bit?  Forget the RAM issue for the moment. :)

 

Thanks.



#655
Vapaa

Vapaa
  • Members
  • 5 028 messages

Way ahead on the CPU front, but games are closing in on my GPU...

 

Recommended should be a doodle, provided the optimization isn't abysmal *cough*NFS Rivals*cough*, might even be able to push some settings in ultra, but completly maxed will be for way better rigs than mine.



#656
mrpoultry

mrpoultry
  • Members
  • 360 messages

Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit

i5 4670k @3.4GHz (4 CPUs)

8GB RAM

GTX 770, 2GB VRAM

 

1080p resolution and 60fps is my goal.

 

Can I max maybe??

Yes. If you must use AA, use x2.



#657
WillieStyle

WillieStyle
  • Members
  • 1 298 messages

I believe those results are specifically for the 13" model with integrated graphics.

You're right of course.  So my laptop is more than good enough.



#658
Deveth

Deveth
  • Members
  • 6 messages

Since I'm totally not familiar with hardware and things like that. How those minimum requirements compare to games such as BF4 or Shadow of Mordor ? (Because I can run those games on my laptop ;) )



#659
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 188 messages

I'm having no luck finding confirmation through my searching of the forum..

 

Am I right to assume that 32bit Windows 7 is going to be a problem simply because it's 32bit?  Forget the RAM issue for the moment. :)

 

Thanks.

The minimum specs mention a 64bit OS, so 32bit is explicitly not supported. That doesn't *necessarily* mean DAI won't run on 32bit, but I consider it very likely. And if so, it will be a hard "not run at all" rather than just being slower.



#660
mrpoultry

mrpoultry
  • Members
  • 360 messages

Hmm, I have a feeling I may need to tone down some graphic settings to run this smoothly on my 1440p screen.

 

i5 3570k

16 GB

GTX 780 3 GB

 

I need to test how BF4 runs on my PC.  :P

I was about to suggest you do that, but you should be fine. The only way you'll know for sure is if you experiement with it once you get your hands on the game.



#661
Kidd

Kidd
  • Members
  • 3 667 messages

Know if any of the core architecture of .0 was changed significantly for .1? I hear the UX was changed to make it feel more traditional/familiar desktop, but I haven't heard whether it's actually all that different under the hood. As such, I couldn't think of much reason why DAI wouldn't run just fine on 8.0.

There must be differences, but I have no idea how big they are or which pieces of code those would be found in. AMD doesn't support Windows 8.0 any longer and tell their users to upgrade to 8.1 if they want AMD's drivers to work, and I'm using a client's archaic in-house remote assistance system which still doesn't run on 8.1 for whatever unknown reason (there is absolutely no frustration laden within this sentence. no sir, there is not ;) ).

Aside from those, I have not had any compatibility issues. BF4 runs perfectly, thankfully.
 
 

Take it I will be good for some ultra level graphics after my upgrade to an 970?
 
Processor
Intel Core i7-4770K CPU  3.50GHz
 
Video Card:
GTX 770
Dedicated Memory 2.0 GB
Total Memory 3.9 GB
 
Memory 16 GB

After the GTX 970, your system will be very similar to mine (slightly faster, in fact). When I went from my 560Ti to a GTX 970, my framerates in Battlefield 4 changed from a ~20-40 on medium settings to an almost constant 60 on ultra (didn't try enabling all the fancy pants settings the nVidia software comes with though, I only maxed out the game's settings themselves). It drops to ~55 now and then when it gets crowded, but it's mostly glued to 60 with VSync on.

BF4 and DAI seem to have similar requirements, so I would expect your machine to work very well with a GTX 970 installed.
 
 

Can I ask you a question, guys?  
Does it support Windows 7 32 bit as this point seems to be unclear in system spec page.
 
Thanks

I would guess not, sadly. The way I read it, it requires Windows 7 or Windows 8.1 both in 64bit. I could be reading it wrong, but I don't think so. Further confirmation from a developer would be welcome, I imagine.
  • BloodyTalon aime ceci

#662
ji.Ruichi

ji.Ruichi
  • Members
  • 138 messages

CPU i5-3570k =(

16GB RAM

AMD HD7990

 

Can I run ultra at 60fps? Worried about my CPU....



#663
BloodyTalon

BloodyTalon
  • Members
  • 2 342 messages

^ I second that but to be fair, these future GPUs are yet to be announced and it's always best to wait a little before jumping on the new cards train.

But yes upgrading from a 770 to a 970 seems a bit overkill.

 

@BloodyTalon: At worse, I'm not sure you will be able to see the difference between Ultra and slightly tweaked High settings TBH. Unless you intend to run the game at max with a very high resolution (1440 for example). I would test the game with your current setup (which is already good ) and then decide if it's to your liking but that's just me.

Try to play games at 1600x1200 or 1200x  or 1280 x 960 or between those depending on things.


  • Avoozl aime ceci

#664
Deathangel008

Deathangel008
  • Members
  • 4 444 messages

[...]580Ti to a GTX 970[...]

i´ve never heard of a 580ti. do you mean the 560ti?
 

CPU i5-3570k =(

16GB RAM

AMD HD7990

 

Can I run ultra at 60fps? Worried about my CPU....

you have a K CPU -> overclock it and you shouldnt have to worry about anything. but even without OC it is a very powerful CPU.


  • ji.Ruichi aime ceci

#665
Kidd

Kidd
  • Members
  • 3 667 messages

i´ve never heard of a 580ti. do you mean the 560ti?

Whoops. That's the second time in this thread I've screwed up a GPU model number. *edits original post*

Yes, I certainly meant 560Ti. A 580 would have performed better than that.

#666
dch2404

dch2404
  • Members
  • 166 messages

I'm having no luck finding confirmation through my searching of the forum..

 

Am I right to assume that 32bit Windows 7 is going to be a problem simply because it's 32bit?  Forget the RAM issue for the moment. :)

 

Thanks.

 

With 32-bit, programmes can only use 3.2 GB of RAM max irrespective of your total RAM.

 

Just go here and download the correct 64 bit version of Win 7 and then follow a guide on how to reinstall Windows.



#667
Typhrus

Typhrus
  • Members
  • 163 messages

to be fair you do meet the min spec. but you should be able to buy a 7xx series card for sub 400 dollars (or a 970  for about 500). largely depending where you live and thus where you buy from (MSY, pcasegear etc)

 

Yeah, I'm quite happy that everything meets the recommended bar the GPU, so I don't particularly need to upgrade. The 560 TI has done me quite well in during the last 3 years and plays Rome2 on mostly max settings pretty well (considering the amount of men,horses, siege units and what not that can be on the field). I only ever experience lag or stuttering in walled sieges, but I think that has more to do with badly optimised sieges than my card.

While a 970 would be nice, I'm not willing to spend $500 on something that is a relatively small update. Going with something from the 7xx series makes a lot more sense for me. I did a little bit of research and have seemingly found a 760 for sub $300 mark, which seems decent enough. This doesn't include postage as I live in the arse end of Australia (but a beautiful countryside with plenty of views overlooking the sea) which will probably bring up the cost a bit.

 

Anyway, thanks for the help Unato and Scoobydooby, it is muchly appreciated.
 



#668
Mercedes-Benz

Mercedes-Benz
  • Members
  • 652 messages

My laptop meets the recommended requirements, apart from the CPU one (mine is an Intel Core i7-4712MQ Processor (6M Cache, 2,30GHz) Quad Core).



#669
Deathangel008

Deathangel008
  • Members
  • 4 444 messages

While a 970 would be nice, I'm not willing to spend $500 on something that is a relatively small update. Going with something from the 7xx series makes a lot more sense for me. I did a little bit of research and have seemingly found a 760 for sub $300 mark, which seems decent enough. This doesn't include postage as I live in the arse end of Australia (but a beautiful countryside with plenty of views overlooking the sea) which will probably bring up the cost a bit.

the 970 has about 250% of the 560ti´s power. "relatively small"?!? the 760 has ~160% of the 560ti´s power, to me this seems like a worse deal compared to the 970. how expensive would a 770 be? would be twice as powerful as the 560ti.

 

My laptop meets the recommended requirements, apart from the CPU one (mine is an Intel Core i7-4712MQ Processor (6M Cache, 2,30GHz) Quad Core).

3 to 3,3GHz with turbo = better than recommended. gpu?


  • Mercedes-Benz aime ceci

#670
Mercedes-Benz

Mercedes-Benz
  • Members
  • 652 messages

3 to 3,3GHz with turbo = better than recommended. gpu?

 

I never even heard of this turbo boost techonology until I saw your post and looked it up, thanks!

 

As for the GPU, it's a NVIDIA GeForce 840M 2 GB.



#671
Deathangel008

Deathangel008
  • Members
  • 4 444 messages

I never even heard of this turbo boost techonology until I saw your post and looked it up, thanks!

 

As for the GPU, it's a NVIDIA GeForce 840M 2 GB.

thats what i already thought. the GT840M is below the recommended specs. i guess its power is comparable to the desktop GTX650ti, maybe a bit slower, but the GTX660 is ~50% faster than the GTX650ti.



#672
ForgottenWarrior

ForgottenWarrior
  • Members
  • 683 messages
My 660GTX seems to be good ennough for Ultra settings.

#673
Monoten

Monoten
  • Members
  • 263 messages

Minor error on my part when we sent this information off.

 

The Recommended specs should have said 2 GB of video card memory.

Thank you very much Mr. French. Now I know for sure that I'll play with the highest quality possible. 



#674
Deathangel008

Deathangel008
  • Members
  • 4 444 messages

My 660GTX seems to be good ennough for Ultra settings.

i dont think so. the "recommended" specs are usually not enough for the highest settings. i guess you´ll need at least a GTX770/780 for ultra settings @ FHD @ 60fps


  • Kidd aime ceci

#675
archav3n

archav3n
  • Members
  • 486 messages

I have one gripe that the characters icon on the left and the health bars are too huge that i find them distractive. Is there an option to scale the UI ala Divinity Original Sins has it?

 

These big UIs are good for TV and if you play from a far. But i play using a PC monitor so it would be great if they have UI scaling. Thanks


  • Kidd aime ceci