1427 réponses à ce sujet

[SilentCid]

I might try and do the nVidia DSR for this game. I have 2 780GTX in SLI so it would be cool to see if I can run the game in 4K and then via DSR downscale it to my 1440p Resolution. Might be pretty damned nice with DSR being better than AA, as instead of AA. Should make it crisp.

 

Might be too much to handle but I think I'll try.

 

I tried it with battlefield 4 using just one 780ti to my 2560x1440 monitor. It didn't like it all too much scaling it from 4K resolutions back down to my monitor. I'll have to play with it some more using the Nvidia control panel instead of the Geforce Experience.

[Zoltansbeard]

Well Assassin Creed system requirements came out... a r9 290X for recommended. Yah, I think a whole lot of PC gamers who may have bought that now have a lot more money for DA:I 

 

and a GTX680 2gb as MINIMUM  ... also 6gb of Ram and an i5 2500K all as minimum

 

Ubisoft just lost 70-80% of its PC Customers

 

i will NEVER complain about Biowares requierements EVER

[I SOLD MY SOUL TO BIOWARE]

LOL

 

In comparison to what you'd need to run AC Unity, you can basically run DA:I on a toaster. Based Ubisoft optimization...

[FiveThreeTen]

OMG Ubisoft.

Not that it affects me much. The first and last AC I played was ACII, it was fun but it was enough.

[wolfhowwl]

"On PC, usually you don't really care about the performance, because the idea is that if it's not [running] fast enough, you buy a bigger GPU." -Ubisoft

[Zoltansbeard]

"On PC, usually you don't really care about the performance, because the idea is that if it's not [running] fast enough, you buy a bigger GPU." -Ubisoft

 

The basic idea that you CAN upgrade a PC and you cant upgrade a console is not false

but to assume everyone has 200-300$/€ lying around all the time in case a new game comes around.... yeah... sure

Ubisoft made a bad judgement call here... its not a "minority" of PC Gamers who need to upgrade.. its ****** 80-90%....

 

I mean its not gonna kill me... im upgrading my PC by Christmas... the two months till then DA:I will keep me more than busy^^

 

but still.. releasing requierements 80-90% of the People dont met... thats rough

[Kinthalis ThornBlade]

The AC requirements are VERY strange indeed. 

 

It's minimum requirements are parts that are 2-3 times as powerful as a PS4. Either the PC version is WAY better than the console version,. or they done screwed something up.

[archav3n]

The AC requirements are VERY strange indeed. 

 

It's minimum requirements are parts that are 2-3 times as powerful as a PS4. Either the PC version is WAY better than the console version,. or they done screwed something up.

 

Requirements are so steep on PC perhaps they wanted to encourage people to get the consoles version instead. It makes sense to buy a cheap consoles rather than upgrading PC. There are numerous reports that the console platform holders namely Microsoft & Sony implies to game developers that certain game must be locked at 30fps on PC. How true is that, nobody knows. But there are reports on it.

[The Loyal Nub]

I've seen some really insane req's coming out recently from developers and I have to wonder if card makers need to give them a swift kick. I mean when a game like Shadows of Mordor asks for sixgb of card memory, to run at ultra, and the latest Nvidia card only carries 4 then there is a problem and it needs to be addressed. I am not shelling out a grand for a new highest-end card each time a new swanky game comes out not that I had any intention of playing Mordor of the Creed game (I didn't).

[Brogan]

The AC requirements are VERY strange indeed. 
 
It's minimum requirements are parts that are 2-3 times as powerful as a PS4. Either the PC version is WAY better than the console version,. or they done screwed something up.

Or...

Requirements are so steep on PC perhaps they wanted to encourage people to get the consoles version instead. It makes sense to buy a cheap consoles rather than upgrading PC. There are numerous reports that the console platform holders namely Microsoft & Sony implies to game developers that certain game must be locked at 30fps on PC. How true is that, nobody knows. But there are reports on it.

... and there you have it. There are some very ethically questionable practices going on behind the scenes by the powers that be (ie the Marketing Dept).

And they center on the greed of the console manufacturers and their outright contempt of the pc gaming community and the dollars they think they are losing to them.

[skjutengris]

I've seen some really insane req's coming out recently from developers and I have to wonder if card makers need to give them a swift kick. I mean when a game like Shadows of Mordor asks for sixgb of card memory, to run at ultra, and the latest Nvidia card only carries 4 then there is a problem and it needs to be addressed. I am not shelling out a grand for a new highest-end card each time a new swanky game comes out not that I had any intention of playing Mordor of the Creed game (I didn't).

 

 

The reason for ram requirement is that consoles today can utlize more ram than before it also means textures can be more detailed for the consoles today etc..all arising demands for pc.

Played shadow and cant say I found the game demanding.

 

the below test shows ultra textures fps from NH.

[dch2404]

Requirements are so steep on PC perhaps they wanted to encourage people to get the consoles version instead. It makes sense to buy a cheap consoles rather than upgrading PC. There are numerous reports that the console platform holders namely Microsoft & Sony implies to game developers that certain game must be locked at 30fps on PC. How true is that, nobody knows. But there are reports on it.

 

Technically it is one report, the original source being that reddit post by a French student who was visited by Ubisoft for a Q&A at his university. Still, it wouldn't surprise me if the allegations that MS was providing dump trucks full of parity of money were true. Their contempt for PC gaming is pretty evident. They have neglected DirectX as confirmed by Chris Roberts' (of Star Citizen) reasons for supporting Mantle. And when was the last time PC users got a new Age of Empires or Flight Simulator game, or even Halo 3/Gears of War for that matter.

 

I'm not convinced about Sony based on current evidence. Their in-house studios like Naughty Dog have managed to reach 60 fps, and ironically enough Sony are more supportive of PC games than Microsoft are. Their MMOs are still going pretty well, like Everquest and Planetside.

 

I think Ubisoft are looking for an excuse to exit the PC market and are deliberately pulling off a horrible launch to "prove" low sales, piracy, etc. It worked for Halo 2 (forcing Vista) and Gears of War (buggy launch, terrible port). Those botched launches, whether intentional or not, killed those franchises on PC.

[naughty99]

The reason for ram requirement is that consoles today can utlize more ram than before it also means textures can be more detailed for the consoles today etc..all arising demands for pc.

Played shadow and cant say I found the game demanding.

 

the below test shows ultra textures fps from NH.

 

 

Meeting the VRAM requirement for that particular title wouldn't necessarily improve avg frame rate compared to the same card with lower VRAM.

 

As I understand it, this is intended to reduce stutter and hitching on Ultra with the optional texture pack, using the in-game DSR/downsampling setting (e.g., renders at 1440p or 4k, then downsamples for 1080p display). Under those settings, some have reported VRAM usage up to 5.9GB on Titan Black as well as reduced hitching.

 

When space runs out in VRAM, the old texture data needs to be switched out and new textures loaded up from your drive and/or system RAM into the VRAM. "Hitching" occurs when a slight pause results from your texture data getting switched in/out of VRAM, loading up from the drive, etc.

 

If you don't have enough VRAM, you could have over 60fps avg frame rate, but still experience hitching when your GPU has to pause to wait for new data to be loaded.

[BellPeppers&Beef023]

Ubisoft hates PC gamers. Understatement of the decade. Thats okay tho, the feeling is mutual on my part.

[Kinthalis ThornBlade]

I've seen some really insane req's coming out recently from developers and I have to wonder if card makers need to give them a swift kick. I mean when a game like Shadows of Mordor asks for sixgb of card memory, to run at ultra, and the latest Nvidia card only carries 4 then there is a problem and it needs to be addressed. I am not shelling out a grand for a new highest-end card each time a new swanky game comes out not that I had any intention of playing Mordor of the Creed game (I didn't).

 

So far those requirements have turned out to be way overzealous though. My 3 GB 780 ti runs the game at ultra everything at 60 FPS at 2560x1440. That's twice the framerate and twice the resolution of a PS4 and with better graphics settings too (foliage is much better and denser on PC than PS4 for example). In fact the game runs better than a PS4 on a 750 ti! 

 

This has been the case with pretty much every multi-platform game released yet. Alien Isolation for example, runs better on PC than on PS4 even with LOWER END GPU's than the 750 ti. (that's probably a dev issue though ).

 

I think we're going to have to wait and see on AC:U after the various tech sites have done some benchmarking to see what's going on.

[Monoten]

I can't believe AC is asking a gtx 680 as bare minimum. Do they know how much something like that costs? I don't have 500 euro's lying around that I can spend on a graphics card, (plus the game itself) And it's weird that a game like Shadows of Mordor, which is pretty high graphic, doesn't require a high-end card like that at all. 

 

The same if you take a look at DAI. The graphics from the recommended specs from the pc are comparible with how the game would looks on the ps4 or xbox one. So a gtx 660 would be a bare minimum. But instead Ubisoft says that you need a GTX 980 to get the same results as a ps4 or a xbox one. That doesn't make any sense.

 

I do wonder what would happen I if played the game with my gtx 660 TI. Would it be extremely slow, or would the graphics be messed up?

 

In any case, I'm awfully happy that Bioware is keeping the specs affordable. You go Bioware!

[Deathangel008]

I can't believe AC is asking a gtx 680 as bare minimum. Do they know how much something like that costs? I don't have 500 euro's lying around that I can spend on a graphics card, (plus the game itself)

*~250€ for the GTX770^^
 

The same if you take a look at DAI. The graphics from the recommended specs from the pc are comparible with how the game would looks on the ps4 or xbox one. So a gtx 660 would be a bare minimum. But instead Ubisoft says that you need a GTX 980 to get the same results as a ps4 or a xbox one. That doesn't make any sense.
 
I do wonder what would happen I if played the game with my gtx 660 TI. Would it be extremely slow, or would the graphics be messed up?

it´s Ubishit, what are you expecting? they are too stupid to optimize games for PC. but i´m pretty sure that the game will also run acceptable or even good on slower cards, like your 660ti.

[Monoten]

*~250€ for the GTX770^^
 

it´s Ubishit, what are you expecting? they are too stupid to optimize games for PC. but i´m pretty sure that the game will also run acceptable or even good on slower cards, like your 660ti.

Where exactly? 

 

I hope it works, would be nice. But I'm wondering if the game wouldn't even start if you don't have the right card. 

[Deathangel008]

Where exactly?

germany.
 

[Swehall]

Can you get 4k resolution without mantle if you're using nividia?

[RifuloftheWest]

Can you get 4k resolution without mantle if you're using nividia?

 

Mantle is not required in order to play DAI at 4k resolution.

[lafidaninfa]

Hello! Sorry if this has already been answered. I will be traveling from November to January and sadly I won't have access on my PC. Could I possibly run DA:I on a MacBook Pro Retina 13'' with Ιntel Iris Graphics 1536 MB, on boot camp with Windows 7? I am going crazy! Thank you in advance!

[Deathangel008]

Can you get 4k resolution without mantle if you're using nividia?

with Nvidia you can get UHD on a FHD monitor

[Fenticia]

Sorry if this was asked before, if i can play Battlefield 4 on low settings,will i be able to play DA:I?

[dch2404]

Hello! Sorry if this has already been answered. I will be traveling from November to January and sadly I won't have access on my PC. Could I possibly run DA:I on a MacBook Pro Retina 13'' with Ιntel Iris Graphics 1536 MB, on boot camp with Windows 7? I am going crazy! Thank you in advance!

 

I had a heart attack when I was looking up the CPUs for those Macs and saw the prices they charge. As with all integrated graphics you are skating on thin ice. Here are some benchmarks. Scroll down to BF4 and make a judgement for yourself whether you would find ~25-30 fps and ultra-low graphics acceptable or not. I'm not sure how much customisability there will be in the graphics options, but you might be able to do what this guy did, but bear in mind this guy had a desktop quad core i7-3770 to compensate for his lack of dedicated GPU, whereas you most likely have a mobile dual core i5.