SLI Titans. GO BIG OR GO HOME
Why Titans? 980 is not better?
SLI Titans. GO BIG OR GO HOME
Why Titans? 980 is not better?
I just watched the video, and it seems like we have to click on the enemy to attack, just like in DAO. In DA2 we had an attack button, which helped a lot, so I hope they didn't remove it.
Anyway, I'm pretty happy that I can run the game. That's what matters.
It appears that my five-year-old gaming laptop can handle the lowest settings. It has the minimum specs exactly, except that its video card is 1GB, not 512MB. While I'd certainly like to be able to have everything at maximum shininess, buying a new system just for one game isn't really economical, so this is good news for me. ![]()
Does anyone have an idea whether an Nvidia 970 with 4GB VRAM will be able to run DAI at 2560x1600? I'm considering to buy a new monitor.
I should know this, having gamed for many years, but... are the recommended specs for like, smooth play on high settings? But not max settings?
Just taking a stab at it, but being the Frostbite engine, you will likely have a wide range of specific rendering options to tick on or off, in addition to AA, AF, multiple texture filtering techniques, and add-on effects like ambient occlusion, tesselation, etc. The engine lets you mess with almost everything.
And hopefully, they will hook up with Nvidia to get the GeForce Experience option working, which would pick all the specific settings for you for the best gameplay possible (this is if you have an Nvidia card only of course).
Processor: 1.7 GHz Intel Core i5
Can my 1GB Radeon HD 4850 still handle it? i know its just below the minimum requirement...
SLI Titans. GO BIG OR GO HOME
*faints*
Though odd question why do the AMD cpus need to be six core, are there quad cores still lagging behind intels?
Heh, I was kinda self-loathingly hoping for absurd cpu requirements to have an excuse to make the x99 leap... But my 2500k will not go quietly into the night. Still chugging along nicely at a mild overclock, think it's at 4.2 GHz right now and not breaking a sweat, 4.6 took too much voltage tweaking. 4 years old and has just eaten up everything I throw at it. Sandy Bridge was so damned good at the time.
That's probably why I'm not going to a an X99 build. I don't see a reason for it in gaming despite games showing they're using more cores effectively. Nothing really touches a 3-4 year old CPU from Intel yet especially overclocked.
Guest_TrillClinton_*
Minimum:
OS
Windows 7 or 8.1 64-bit
CPU
AMD quad core CPU @ 2.5 GHz
Intel quad core CPU @ 2.0 GHz
System RAM
4 GB
Graphics CARD
AMD Radeon HD 4870
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Graphics Memory
512 MB
Hard Drive
26 GB
DirectX
10
Recommended:
OS
Windows 7 or 8.1 64-bit
CPU
AMD six core CPU @ 3.2 GHz
Intel quad core CPU @ 3.0 GHz
System RAM
8 GB
Graphics CARD
AMD Radeon HD 7870 or R9 270
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Graphics Memory
3 GB
Hard Drive
26 GB
DirectX
11
* Xbox 360 controller supported
* 100% DirectX 9.0c compatible sound card
* Online Authentication at time of installation
The scaling from minimum to maximum is impressive.
Alright I am officially bought.
24". I've had it for 7 years.I can't stand black bars. I was really hoping for a 30" 1440p monitor but that didn't happen. How big is your monitor? Trust me. When you game on 30" monitor the immersion sky-rocketed!
Guest_TrillClinton_*
Can my 1GB Radeon HD 4850 still handle it? i know its just below the minimum requirement...
You have 1GB of graphical memory, you should be fine because the minimum of graphical memory is 512MB.
Play around with your graphical settings, I am sure they are a lot of things you can switch off.
Though odd question why do the AMD cpus need to be six core, are there quad cores still lagging behind intels?
This brilliant comment on Reddit explains it.
Are you crazy?Why Titans? 980 is not better?
Processor: 1.7 GHz Intel Core i5
RAM: 8 GB DDR3L SDRAMHard Drive: 1000 GB SATAGraphics Coprocessor: NVIDIA GeForce 840MGraphics Card Ram: Size 2000 MBIt is a laptop... I thought it would be a problem. >_>Fortunately I'm getting a PS4 soon.
Should depend primarily on the resolution you will play on with the 840M. Should run on medium if it is less than 1080p.
All my computer will tell me is that my Raedon is somewhere in the 6800 series. Good enough?
You will be able to run it on medium settings I think
Neat!
It's now or never. I got myself an brand new PC an couple of months ago. Here I am hoping it was worth it.
I wonder, could I run the game on high/ultra with these specs?
Windows 7 - 64 bit
Nvidia GTX 760
i7 processor
8 GB of memory
Should depend primarily on the resolution you will play on with the 840M. Should run on medium if it is less than 1080p.
So do you think it'll run with the crap processor?
Yep. =)
I just watched the video, and it seems like we have to click on the enemy to attack, just like in DAO. In DA2 we had an attack button, which helped a lot, so I hope they didn't remove it.
Anyway, I'm pretty happy that I can run the game. That's what matters.
Yep, it was default R in DA2, "Target closest enemy and attack"
I'm sure it will be in DA:I.
Almost every game uses 8 GB RAM as their recommended specs. Been like that since right when/right before consoles came out. At least games graphically intensive like this.
So relieved I have 16 gigs of RAM. That should compensate for the one gig ATI 6970 card I have. If I can run the game at medium settings I'll be happy. ![]()
I was planning on purchasing a 660 anyway so this works out swimmingly.