And still plays her like a fiddle the entire book.
Hell Celene can't even BETRAY him competently.
Okay, I'm finally back at my computer instead of my smart phone, so I can respond to this the way I'd like.
"playing her like a fiddle" is an exaggeration that can hardly apply without consistent success. He tricks her, sure, but not to the ends he's hoping for...Which would be be her death. Which doesn't happen, so...
Any claims of either one of them totally dominating any situation between them come off as biased, because the story is written deliberately so that doesn't happen. They both trick each other, and they both get lucky, unlucky...etc.
More importantly, I don't care about the who is worse between Gaspard or Celene debate. It is indeed a pick your poison situation, which I imagine will contribute more to game flavor than to actual possitive/negative results.
My original point was that this example from Br3admax:
"Noble: Gaspard! I want you to kill all the elves in the alienage! Now!
Gaspard: No.
N: I'll hate you!
G: Okay. I really don't care."
far from having "actually happened" as Br3admax claimed, would be very, very unlikely because of the plain fact that Gaspard orchestrated the situation in Halamshiral to happen. He hoped she would go to put the rebellion down just as she did, thus his saying no to doing so himself out of, what, sheer lionhearted badassery? No, not probable. And it certainly didn't "actually happen".
@ Br3admax:
As for you not caring about the elves; I didn't assume you did. However, you brought the above scenario up with the implication that it's a point in favor of Gaspard.
My whole point was that your imaginary Gaspard's response is brought into question pretty heavily by his culpability in what happened to the elves at Halamshiral. I'm not debating the rightness or wrongness of it, but the actual facts of what happened.