Aller au contenu

Photo

So I can run it on PC at minimum specs...


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
59 réponses à ce sujet

#26
Falrach

Falrach
  • Members
  • 57 messages

Hey guys how about my system? I have:

Amd Phenom II x4 965 BE
ATI HD 7870
12 GB memory

 

Should run it without problems, but not on maximal settings



#27
UniformGreyColor

UniformGreyColor
  • Members
  • 1 455 messages

Which would result in probably having to buy, at least, a better PSU and maybe even a small RAM update. Not everyone wants to spend that kind of money.

Besides, the r9 280 will most likely be able to handle TW3 just fine.

 

Where are you getting this info from? Their processor should be fine with an OC and what makes you think the r9 280 is good enough and not the CPU?



#28
Degenerate Rakia Time

Degenerate Rakia Time
  • Banned
  • 5 073 messages

Well according to the Can you PC run it site I need to upgrade my video card.  Right now I have a GeForce 9800 GT.  But it also has my CPU as a blue I in a circle?  I have Intel® Core™ i5-3450 CPU @ 3.10GHz

eh, with that GPU if you play at 720p and turn off anti-aliasing you should be able to set everything else to high or ultra

#29
aeoncs

aeoncs
  • Members
  • 334 messages

Where are you getting this info from? Their processor should be fine with an OC and what makes you think the r9 280 is good enough and not the CPU?

 

I didn't say anything about the CPU (?).



#30
UniformGreyColor

UniformGreyColor
  • Members
  • 1 455 messages

I didn't say anything about the CPU (?).

 

Right you said PSU not CPU. I hope you're not someone who thinks upgrading to a 1000W PSU is standard.

 

Anyways, ignore me people I just talk a lot.



#31
BackdoorPaco

BackdoorPaco
  • Members
  • 358 messages

Where are you getting this info from? Their processor should be fine with an OC and what makes you think the r9 280 is good enough and not the CPU?

Clarify please, I really don't know what you're trying to bring up.

 

Ninja'd



#32
aeoncs

aeoncs
  • Members
  • 334 messages

Right you said PSU not CPU. I hope you're not someone who thinks upgrading to a 1000W PSU is standard.

 

Obviously not. It's just that when I see a rig like that: i5 3450, 8GB RAM and a 9800 GT, it literally reeks of a pre-built PC - and most of the time, those come with bad/no-name brand PSUs that look decent at first glance (to deceive people with limited knowledge) but in reality they're little more than cowsh*t.



#33
NRieh

NRieh
  • Members
  • 2 907 messages

If BF4 comparing screens show anything, I'd say that 'low' preset still looks decent (if not good). The difference with 'ultra' is obvious, but it's not that bad actually.

 

Probably, we could ask devs to show us some 'low' screens, so that people who own both PC and console could decide which is better for them? Preferably with both DX10 and DX11 rendering. 

 

you can watch the BF4 preset comparing vid here



#34
Dubya75

Dubya75
  • Members
  • 4 598 messages

Being curious about how Frostbite games look and feel, I installed BF4 and NFS Rivals on my PC. Even at the lowest settings, both these games still look pretty good! 

My advice would be to get the game, run it, and then decide on upgrading components.


  • Melca36 et Elfyoth aiment ceci

#35
UniformGreyColor

UniformGreyColor
  • Members
  • 1 455 messages

Obviously not. It's just that when I see a rig like that: i5 3450, 8GB RAM and a 9800 GT, it literally reeks of a pre-built PC - and most of the time, those come with bad/no-name brand PSUs that look decent at first glance (to deceive people with limited knowledge) but in reality they're little more than cowsh*t.

 

I agree, Glad we cleared that up.



#36
dragonwanderer

dragonwanderer
  • Members
  • 101 messages

Hoping for at least medium settings. But yeah I have just a little better HW than min.

Intel Core 2 Quad @ 2.40GHz, 4,00GB DDR2, GTX 560 (1GB VRAM)

I hope it will be enough. If not I will be playing on min. It should still not be too horrible but... :P



#37
aeoncs

aeoncs
  • Members
  • 334 messages

I agree, Glad we cleared that up.

 

All's well that ends well. (;

 

 

 

Hoping for at least medium settings. But yeah I have just a little better HW than min.

Intel Core 2 Quad @ 2.40GHz, 4,00GB DDR2, GTX 560 (1GB VRAM)

I hope it will be enough. If not I will be playing on min. It should still not be too horrible but... :P

 

Resolution? Could (!) be tricky on 1080p, but anything below that and I'd say you're good to go for Medium settings.



#38
Panda

Panda
  • Members
  • 7 459 messages

I got through DAO although I wasn't even in level of mininum specs.. I guess you will do okay too with DAI ^^

 

It won't be as pretty though but I think you can just play it fine.



#39
Super.Sid

Super.Sid
  • Members
  • 594 messages

Could anyone comment on whether my laptop can handle the game on low to med settings?

Core i3 3110M 2.4 GHz

4 GB RAM DDR3
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 7670M 1 GB DDR3



#40
Fredvdp

Fredvdp
  • Members
  • 6 186 messages

Hey guys how about my system? I have:

Amd Phenom II x4 965 BE
ATI HD 7870
12 GB memory

If you use the Mantle API, it should run very well with your CPU bottleneck. I have the same CPU paired with a Radeon R9 270x and I get a massive framerate boost in BF4 when enabling Mantle. In some cases even double the framerate I get with DirectX 11.

 

Edit: I launched BF4 real quickly, and while I get 60 fps (my fps cap) on the high preset at 1080p, I do notice some framedrops in multiplayer. Single players is really smooth, though.



#41
Fredvdp

Fredvdp
  • Members
  • 6 186 messages

Well according to the Can you PC run it site I need to upgrade my video card.  Right now I have a GeForce 9800 GT.  But it also has my CPU as a blue I in a circle?  I have Intel® Core™ i5-3450 CPU @ 3.10GHz

The GPU is faster than the minimum. It's not great, but it will do.

 

"Can You run It" is a very inaccurate tool. I advise caution when using it.


  • Melca36 aime ceci

#42
Hyperion

Hyperion
  • Members
  • 82 messages

Could anyone comment on whether my laptop can handle the game on low to med settings?

Core i3 3110M 2.4 GHz

4 GB RAM DDR3
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 7670M 1 GB DDR3

Hmm, laptop specs are often really hard to compare against desktop specs, as the difference between the two changes a lot between generations. If you want my honest opinion however, this probably won't be enough to run DA:I at any comfortable level. I'm going to assume that your screen is 1366x768, so you might be able to muddle through, but this is really a game meant to be run on a mid-range desktop, or a high end laptop. A low-mid range laptop is going to be iffy at best.

 

If you are planning on getting DA:I and are looking to buy or build a new computer, there are plenty of people here or elsewhere who will be able to help you get a fantastic deal for fairly little, you're looking at probably $700-800 (including peripherals) for a setup capable of running DA:I and other games at decent framerates on probably medium settings at 1080p.

 

PM me if you want any specific help, otherwise, there are plenty of places out there where you can get recommendations for a new build that will suit all of your needs.



#43
eternalshiva

eternalshiva
  • Members
  • 413 messages

I meet all other requirements for recommended but my CPU is sitting at 2.3GHz which drops me to minimum. I'll see what it's like when I run it.

 

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 /w 3GB VRAM

Core i7-3610QM (Ivy Bridge)

CPU 2.3GHz

16GB Ram

 

Blerg.



#44
Super.Sid

Super.Sid
  • Members
  • 594 messages

Hmm, laptop specs are often really hard to compare against desktop specs, as the difference between the two changes a lot between generations. If you want my honest opinion however, this probably won't be enough to run DA:I at any comfortable level. I'm going to assume that your screen is 1366x768, so you might be able to muddle through, but this is really a game meant to be run on a mid-range desktop, or a high end laptop. A low-mid range laptop is going to be iffy at best.

 

If you are planning on getting DA:I and are looking to buy or build a new computer, there are plenty of people here or elsewhere who will be able to help you get a fantastic deal for fairly little, you're looking at probably $700-800 (including peripherals) for a setup capable of running DA:I and other games at decent framerates on probably medium settings at 1080p.

 

PM me if you want any specific help, otherwise, there are plenty of places out there where you can get recommendations for a new build that will suit all of your needs.

Won't be able to use a desktop as I use my laptop for travel and getting a desktop isnt feasible as of now. As far as the game requirements, my processor is i3 so 2 core 2 thread so 4 thread = quad core and ram is the suggested 4 gb. Only doubt is whether the graphic card can handle it. It is of 1 gb and many a times, a few games that were said to not run on laptop graphic card do run smoothly on low to med settings. Im looking at a resolution of 1080 p to max 1280 p



#45
Navasha

Navasha
  • Members
  • 3 724 messages

Min PC specs are still going to exceed the last gen versions of the games.    It won't run choppy and such, as long as you have the settings down where they should be.    Stuttering and choppy are only going to be if you try to increase the settings beyond your hardware's capability.



#46
Hyperion

Hyperion
  • Members
  • 82 messages

Won't be able to use a desktop as I use my laptop for travel and getting a desktop isnt feasible as of now. As far as the game requirements, my processor is i3 so 2 core 2 thread so 4 thread = quad core and ram is the suggested 4 gb. Only doubt is whether the graphic card can handle it. It is of 1 gb and many a times, a few games that were said to not run on laptop graphic card do run smoothly on low to med settings. Im looking at a resolution of 1080 p to max 1280 p

you'll probably have to turn the resolution down, the 7670M is a decent laptop GPU, but it isn't really what you could call a "1080p card". Basically, you will probably be able to run the game, just don't expect it to look amazingly good.



#47
KennethAFTopp

KennethAFTopp
  • Members
  • 1 480 messages

it says on Can I Run It, that I need to upgrade my GFX card, but it said the same thing about BF4 and I ran that fine on ultra.



#48
Super.Sid

Super.Sid
  • Members
  • 594 messages

you'll probably have to turn the resolution down, the 7670M is a decent laptop GPU, but it isn't really what you could call a "1080p card". Basically, you will probably be able to run the game, just don't expect it to look amazingly good.

Which is fine for me, the graphics look good @ 1080 p for me and the gameplay is smooth from my experience of recent releases. As long as I can play it at low to med, its good with me.



#49
Super.Sid

Super.Sid
  • Members
  • 594 messages

you'll probably have to turn the resolution down, the 7670M is a decent laptop GPU, but it isn't really what you could call a "1080p card". Basically, you will probably be able to run the game, just don't expect it to look amazingly good.

Which is fine for me as long as I can run it on low to med. The recent games on low to med settings look pretty for me at least, so as long as it runs on my current setup, I'm happy.



#50
Osena109

Osena109
  • Members
  • 2 557 messages

Could anyone comment on whether my laptop can handle the game on low to med settings?

Core i3 3110M 2.4 GHz

4 GB RAM DDR3
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 7670M 1 GB DDR3

well I talked to  Barrett Rodych  am in the same boat as you i have  i3 4130  3.4  evga gt 740 4gb ddr3 and  6 gb ram  he said i should be able to run it on medium settings diping in to high