1137 réponses à ce sujet

[iggy4566]

4930k 

 

GTX Titan Black sli

 

Rampage Black edition

 

1200 Watt PSU corsair

 

32GB of RAM

 

 

[naughty99]

4930k 

 

GTX Titan Black sli

 

Rampage Black edition

 

1200 Watt PSU corsair

 

32GB of RAM

 

Hmm, I don't know, seems like you need an upgrade. Can you drop a few more Titan Blacks in there for 4-way SLI? 

[InterrogationBear]

Well since we have the official specs I'll just ask nicely:

 

AMD A8-6600K APU with Radeon™ HD Graphics 3.9 GHz

8GB RAM

AMD Radeon HD 8570D 768 mb

Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium

 

It will work, but won't be pretty. The graphics part of your APU is pretty slow.

 

If you want to play DA:I on high settings with a good framerate, you should consider investing about 100 USD/EUR  and buy discrete graphics card.

 

The AMD R7 260X is slightly better than the GPU of the PS4 (300-400% more than what you have now) and lets you take advantage of the Mantle-API. Only buy one with 2 GB VRAM.

[Malvus]

FX-6300

8GB RAM

R9 270x 2GB VRAM

Windows 7 Home Premium SP1

I suppose DA:I will also have Mantle support at launch since it's integrated within Frostbite 3 but will the performance be the same? In BF4 it stays above 60 fps but it sometimes drops frames when having to load stuff. It also drops frames in multiplayer as well. Hope they'll get over that in DA:I.

Also, hi. I'm new here as you might have guessed.

[Zered]

It will work, but won't be pretty. The graphics part of your APU is pretty slow.

 

If you want to play DA:I on high settings with a good framerate, you should consider investing about 100 USD/EUR  and buy discrete graphics card.

 

The AMD R7 260X is slightly better than the GPU of the PS4 (300-400% more than what you have now) and lets you take advantage of the Mantle-API. Only buy one with 2 GB VRAM.

Nah I can live with lower details, no biggie. Shadow of Mordor runs ok for me at the moment so INQ will be no diffetent I think.

[Elfyoth]

Okay so, I am planning to upgrade my pc so, what system will I be able to run DA:I in the most maximum graphics all max...

[naughty99]

Okay so, I am planning to upgrade my pc so, what system will I be able to run DA:I in the most maximum graphics all max...

What resolution? And do you mean with steady 60fps?

[Elfyoth]

What resolution? And do you mean with steady 60fps?

 

I mean in total, Reccomended, will be able to run this on max? Cuz I have heared that it wont, btw my sys is and dont worry I dont plan that this sys will be able to run it on max... lol or high or even med,,,

 

Intel® Core™ i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz 3.60GHz

 

4.00 GB Ram

 

Win 7 64

and...:::

 

GeForce GT 630

 

version 70.8 ad 0.94

 

Graphical memory avalible: 3820 MB

 

Forgot how to say it in eng,... damn that part of the computer we must have without it we wont see anything bla bla bla, memory:  2048MB

 

same thing but on the device?: 0mb lol

 

United graphical memory: 1772 MB...

 

Sorry about this long thread and I am noob at this stuff.. so help? Will I be able to run it on what? Low? Med? Combined?

[Kinthalis ThornBlade]

I mean in total, Reccomended, will be able to run this on max? Cuz I have heared that it wont, btw my sys is and dont worry I dont plan that this sys will be able to run it on max... lol or high or even med,,,

 

Intel® Core™ i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz 3.60GHz

 

4.00 GB Ram

 

Win 7 64

and...:::

 

GeForce GT 630

 

version 70.8 ad 0.94

 

Graphical memory avalible: 3820 MB

 

Forgot how to say it in eng,... damn that part of the computer we must have without it we wont see anything bla bla bla, memory:  2048MB

 

same thing but on the device?: 0mb lol

 

United graphical memory: 1772 MB...

 

Sorry about this long thread and I am noob at this stuff.. so help? Will I be able to run it on what? Low? Med? Combined?

 

Low settings if you want to keep it north of 30 FPS at most times. You might be able to up a setting or two to medium but you will get drops into the twenties. And this is at 720p.

[Azaron Nightblade]

I'm curious whether my laptop will run DA:I properly, and was hoping for some advice if this thread's still going. 

 

Windows 7 (64-bits)

Intel Core i7-2630QM CPU @ 2.00GHz

10240MB RAM

GeForce GT540M (1GB)

 

I appreciate any help you guys can provide!

 

No one has any idea about my crappy laptop? 

[The Loyal Nub]

Can the people with the Titans and 980's quit posting in this thread? Keep that thing in your pants Rambo. 

[Barrett Rodych]

Hmm, my desktop may be able to run it after all then. 

What's the word on Operating systems? Is it Windows 7 at minimum required? Or can it run on Vista too? (Just not officially supported?)

Does Vista have 64-bit? (I'm not actually sure it did) If so, it might? Certainly no guarantee it would run well.

[Kantr]

Does Vista have 64-bit? (I'm not actually sure it did) If so, it might? Certainly no guarantee it would run well.

It does. It was the first windows os to properly do it

[JMan240]

No one has any idea about my crappy laptop? 

Not gonna happen unfortunately. My old laptop had that same card, and it wouldn't even run the BF3 or BF4 betas. You wouldn't get a playable frame rate, I could barely get one in the original Borderlands.

[Kinthalis ThornBlade]

No one has any idea about my crappy laptop? 

 

This one is pretty borderline. Based on benchmarks I'd guess low at 720p will get you around 30 FPS with drops.

[JMan240]

Just want to clear up some false information being passed around earlier in this thread and a couple others. The GPU is not all you need to upgrade for "pure gaming performance," which I saw someone saying earlier. Your CPU will eventually bottleneck the GPU's performance. You could have a 980 but if you're running a CPU that only meets the minimum requirements of DAI, you still probably won't be running it well. Now, based on the specs DAI is clearly a GPU heavy game, and Frostbite seems to be a GPU heavy engine, but running something like Skyrim or any other open-world game it will still not be a great experience.

 

Also, yeah, um... most new software that needs them can use multiple cores - software like Premier, Photoshop, Unity's Editor, Unreal's Editor, Blender and most video games. Saw someone saying most programs can't use more than 2 cores, and that's a half truth at best. Most software doesn't need more, so it isn't designed for more. There's no real reason for Word to use 4-8 cores. However, games designed on a 64-bit architecture can take advantage of more than two. They'd need to, to get the most out of new consoles and PC tech. So yeah, the idea that DAI won't use more than two cores is kinda absurd - don't listen to people who say stuff like that.

 

And the only advantage to an SSD is not just to have your OS isolated on it's own boot drive. They're significantly faster and more efficient, both in data handling and and power consumption. They're just not very practical from a price perspective at this point. It'd still run you about 1/3 of a reasonable $1500 build's price tag for a 1TB SSD. If you could load everything off the SSD, however, its read/write rates are vastly superior to platter based HDDs. So, don't listen to people who say that. It's not just some fetishized new tech obsession as one person suggested, we're just not at the point where flash memory is cheap enough to be a default option for all but the most well off builders. And no, there is no HDD, not eve a 10000rpm drive, that will hit 'exactly" the same performance level. Although, again, it's probably a good idea to go to a 10000rpm drive for mass storage which is the point we're at with video games now regularly surpassing 20GBs in size.

 

The meaningful differences between AMD and Nvidia cards: Price and efficiency. AMD has generally been cheaper and less efficient (like everything AMD makes), they have some currently proprietary tech that aims to change that with Mantle but it hasn't been proven out and will probably see the same sparse support as PhysX has if they keep it in house. But considering AMD developed it along with DICE, and not alone, it's unlikely Mantle stays a private API for too long. It's just not good business to keep that under wraps, because then no one reaps the benefits because no one uses it. Nvida generally performs slightly better, and I mean slightly as in one to two percent on comparable tech (so a couple frames per second better in a lot of games), and tends to be more efficient in how it handles its information and power consumption, thus giving it that slight advantage. Put simply, Nvidia chips are better optimized, but that comes at a cost. In the end it's basically a performance wash.

 

The difference between the 900 and 700 Nvidia series: Not a lot of performance, but a lot of efficiency. Maxwell is a way more efficient architecture than Kepler was. I can remember exact figures, but I've heard it tossed around that Maxwell may cut energy costs by as much as half over Kepler. What does that mean? A less expensive overall build. If you only need 750w to go with SLI at the highest level instead of 1000w, that's some money you can put elsewhere. It also means costs for running a PC with Maxwell are lower over time than those running Kepler GPUs.

 

Also, as a general rule, the newest series' lowest end card is generally comparable performance wise to the last generation's middle of the pack option. That rule remains mostly the same for each step up the new ladder. So, for example, the GTX 770 is similar performance wise to the 680 which is similar to the 590. This is why Nvidia occasionally eliminates the ti variants when they pop up a generation. (It's also why something like a 590 or 680 is still such an expensive card.) Also, it's probably not a good idea to jump up more than one generation in upgrade from what you originally had. So, it makes sense for me to pick up a new pair of 700 series cards since I built my PC with 600 series cards. However, picking up a 900 series card would be kinda pointless because my FX8350 would bottleneck that card's performance enough to make it a bad long-term investment.

 

So for those asking, the 750ti would be right around the recommended requirements. You should be able to run the game just fine.

[MarchWaltz]

760 gtx 4gb

 

AMD 8350 8 core @ 4

 

16gb ddr3 ram @1300 (or something)

 

I play at 1920x1080

[The Loyal Nub]

 So, it makes sense for me to pick up a new pair of 700 series cards since I built my PC with 600 series cards. However, picking up a 900 series card would be kinda pointless because my FX8350 would bottleneck that card's performance enough to make it a bad long-term investment.

 

 

Hmm. I have a Intel Core i5 3570K 3.40 GHz (Unlocked CPU) with a 660ti and was thinking of upgrading to a 970 card within the next 5 months. Is this a bad idea?

[Ryzaki]

Hmm. I have a Intel Core i5 3570K 3.40 GHz (Unlocked CPU) with a 660ti and was thinking of upgrading to a 970 card within the next 5 months. Is this a bad idea?

Meh I have a i5 2500k with a 970 and it's working fine for me.

[The Loyal Nub]

Meh I have a i5 2500k with a 970 and it's working fine for me.

 

Good to hear! I was a little worried about bottlenecking after what Jman240 posted. Good to know that isn't always the case.

[Navoletti]

Amd 5770 vapor x 1 gb drr5 have compatibility with this game?

[Steelcry]

Pentium® Dual-Core CPU E5300 @ 2.60GHz

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 Dedicated Memory 512 MB

Ram 6GB

Will it play on the lowest setting?

I will likely need to buy something but I would still like to know which I should buy first; the vid card or CPU or are they bothy so bad that I need to get both?

[The Loyal Nub]

I will likely need to buy something but I would still like to know which I should buy first; the vid card or CPU or are they bothy so bad that I need to get both?

 

If your mobo can take it I would start with that CPU first. You need a quadcore so an i-5 is minimum and an i-7 even better. Then you can see about the GPU. Also pay attention to OS (64bit is a must) and PSU.

 

I'd upgrade your ram to 8GB or 16 if you can too.

[finc.loki]

Sounds like you have the same monitor as mine the Asus PB278Q?

Yep, that's the one.

[naughty99]

Complete GPU List for BF4
 
Here is a comparison of BF4 performance for most graphics cards currently on the market, including laptop GPUs.
 
How to use it:
Scroll down, find your GPU on the list and it will give you an idea of how well it runs BF4. As BF4 uses the same engine and has very similar recommended specs, performance for Dragon Age: Inquisition should be similar.

This list shows which GPUs can run BF4 from 1280x720 and up: 

Spoiler

If you have very low end GPU, here is another list. These are super low end, not likely to be able to run the game even at 1280x720.

Spoiler

http://www.videocard...range_gpus.html
http://www.videocard...w_end_gpus.html

60fps, 30fps, What's the difference?

Here is a short video featuring PC gameplay footage at 1080p 60fps (Note that you must watch this in Google Chrome to view the 60fps option. If you don't have Google chrome, click here)


Here is the same video in 1080p 30fps