1137 réponses à ce sujet

[BlaineUK]

My system is approaching 3 years old now and I can't afford any upgrades anytime soon, and I'm wondering whether it just meets the recommended settings or whether it could at least run the game reasonably high?

 

CPU:

Intel® Core™ i7-2600 CPU @ 3.4GHz

 

RAM:

8.00 GB @ 1600MHz

 

GPU:

GeForce GTX 570

 

I've received conflicting reports on whether the GTX 570 is slightly superior to the recommended GTX 660 or not, and my system lists total available graphics memory as 4095mb with 1280mb of that being onboard.

[theacefes]

 

My system is approaching 3 years old now and I can't afford any upgrades anytime soon, and I'm wondering whether it just meets the recommended settings or whether it could at least run the game reasonably high?

 

CPU:

Intel® Core™ i7-2600 CPU @ 3.4GHz

 

RAM:

8.00 GB @ 1600MHz

 

GPU:

GeForce GTX 570

 

I've received conflicting reports on whether the GTX 570 is slightly superior to the recommended GTX 660 or not, and my system lists total available graphics memory as 4095mb with 1280mb of that being onboard.

 

 

Probably high or a mix of medium, high, and ultra settings - it will look pretty good for you, I think. That 1GB of dedicated graphics memory is what's keeping you from recommended settings. 

[Timate]

Not sure see how well that runs on Bf4 I know GTX 750 can run Bf4 on ultra so I will be fine on DAI not sure how well a GTX 570 will run I have heard it being better then the Gtx660 but not really sure. If anything decrease your resolution that will increase your FPS it will make things more jagged though but I use a TV so I don't really have to worry about being jagged it's more fleshed out on a large tv.

[theacefes]

Not sure see how well that runs on Bf4 I know GTX 750 can run Bf4 on ultra so I will be fine on DAI not sure how well a GTX 570 will run I have heard it being better then the Gtx660 but not really sure. If anything decrease your resolution that will increase your FPS it will make things more jagged though but I use a TV so I don't really have to worry about being jagged it's more fleshed out on a large tv.

 

I know BF4 also uses Frostbite but how accurate of a benchmark is it really considering it came out a year ago and the Bioware devs / DICE might have optimized it/modified the engine since?

[BlaineUK]

Thanks for the input guys, I failed to mention I would be running at 1920 * 1080 only.

[Timate]

Optimization means it would be able to run better look at the systems REQ and have BF4 side by side its almost the same REQ. You have to remember also BF4 would create higher issues with FPS that game has to process and refresh faster due to moving at a faster speed. DAI is slower people don't take that into account. It would be different all together if it required way higher REQ however it does not also it only needs 2 GB memory BF4 needs 3. BF4 its basically the best thing to measure what it will be. It would be one thing I it was a different engine all together. Also it's able to play on the PS4 that Gpu is equivalent to a GTX 560 if I recall going by that anyone with a GTX 560 or 660 will be fine anything higher is either high graphics to Ultra.

[Timate]

Why only if you don't mind me asking you could always lower your resolution

[aeoncs]

*snip*

 

First off, I really don't get how people could give conflicting comparisons between those two cards as the 660 is obviously faster and more efficient, not by much but still somewhat noticeably.

And at 1080p you should aim for a mix of High/Medium for constant 60+ FPS and exclusively High settings if you're fine with a few small FPS spikes here and there. Maxed out, and taking BF4 as a benchmark, you can probably expect 30-40FPS with drops to the low 20s or worse.

As some people value graphics over performance, just change the settings a few times early on and choose what works best for you.

[HBziN]

Hey everyone,

 

These are my PC specs:

CPU: Phenom II x4 965 black edition (3.2ghz)
GPU: GeForce GTX 560ti

RAM: 12GB (1333mhz)

Resolution 1920x1080
 

Last game I ran at maximum settings was The Witcher 2.

I recently installed Shadow of Mordor and was able to run it at high settings with tessellation turned off and shadows low (50-60fps). The recommended specs for that game are a little bit higher than the ones for DA:I, so I'm assuming my PC will run the game at least at those settings, am I right?

Thanks in advance,

[Yriss]

Ok, below are my pc stats. I'm not very tech savvy but I'd like to be able to play DAI on PC on High settings if possible. Could someone tell me how likely this is or what I'd need to upgrade to make this possible?

 

I'm already planning on upgrading my memory card to a Nvidia GTX 680.

 

Processor

Intel® Core™ i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz

Memory (RAM)

6.00 GB

Graphics

ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series

Gaming graphics

3839 MB Total available graphics memory

Primary hard disk

559GB Free (1397GB Total)

 

 

Whoa... that is almost exactly the computer specs that I had, before I managed to upgrade everything just a week ago.

[Quibber123]

Do you guys think I'll be able to run it at all high or a mix of med/high at 1360x768 at 40-60 fps? That res specifically because I recently made a new lowish end PC (had been using a bad laptop with 2.2 GHz i3 and HD3000 for a few years for my PC games so this is a huge upgrade) and planned to use an oldish LCD TV I had so I could save some money, and the TV changes display style from PC to TV if it isn't native res or else I'd be using 720p. DA:I is actually what made me finally build a PC.

 

Specs:

i3-4130 at 3.4GHz (dual core but has hyper-threading)

EVGA GTX 750 (not Ti so only 1GB of VRAM since I didn't think I'd actually need 2GB when I'll only be playing only at the 1360x768 quality for some time)

8GB ram (1600MHz)

[President of Boom]

I apologize that this post is only marginally related to 'can my PC run...' discussion but I didn't want to start a new topic.

Can someone shed some light on downsampling for me. My monitor's native resolution is 1920x1080. I've successfully tested downsampling from 3200x1800, and while there is definitely some improvement in the AA department I wonder if the benefits of downsampling outweigh the additional strain I'm putting on my system (I assume I'm putting additional strain on it but I'm not sure).

So, in summary, would you recommend downsampling?

[Kinthalis ThornBlade]

 

Do you guys think I'll be able to run it at all high or a mix of med/high at 1360x768 at 40-60 fps? That res specifically because I recently made a new lowish end PC (had been using a bad laptop with 2.2 GHz i3 and HD3000 for a few years for my PC games so this is a huge upgrade) and planned to use an oldish LCD TV I had so I could save some money, and the TV changes display style from PC to TV if it isn't native res or else I'd be using 720p. DA:I is actually what made me finally build a PC.

 

Specs:

i3-4130 at 3.4GHz (dual core but has hyper-threading)

EVGA GTX 750 (not Ti so only 1GB of VRAM since I didn't think I'd actually need 2GB when I'll only be playing only at the 1360x768 quality for some time)

8GB ram (1600MHz)

 

The 750 non ti can run BF4 at Ultra settings at 30 FPS @ 1080p.

 

 

He has a better CPU than you though. Still I think 768p is definitely doable at the framerate you want to hit at a mix of medium and high settings.

[Kinthalis ThornBlade]

I apologize that this post is only marginally related to 'can my PC run...' discussion but I didn't want to start a new topic.

Can someone shed some light on downsampling for me. My monitor's native resolution is 1920x1080. I've successfully tested downsampling from 3200x1800, and while there is definitely some improvement in the AA department I wonder if the benefits of downsampling outweigh the additional strain I'm putting on my system (I assume I'm putting additional strain on it but I'm not sure).

So, in summary, would you recommend downsampling?

 

Well, there's no permanent damage being done to your hardware, if that's what you mean. Obviously performance suffers when rendering all those pixels.

 

In my opinion it's not really worth it, unless the performance hit still leaves you at 60 FPS (or whatever performance level you want to hit). Downsampling does wonderful things for subpixel aliasing, transparency aliasing and texture aliasing, but I'd rather turn on something like TXAA or SMAA with a temporal filter. As heavy on performance as those AA filters are, they are still LESS of a hit than downscaling from 4K.

 

Plus for optimal IQ you're still probably want to add some MSAA to the super sampled output, putting an even further hit on performance. This is fantastic for older titles, specially ones that don't support other types of aliasing very well. Mass effect for example, looks amazing downsampled and it's easy to get it running at high framerates even when downsampling.

[President of Boom]

^Thanks for the explanation.

[DashRashh]

Ultra for me

[archav3n]

Hey everyone,

 

These are my PC specs:

CPU: Phenom II x4 965 black edition (3.2ghz)
GPU: GeForce GTX 560ti

RAM: 12GB (1333mhz)

Resolution 1920x1080
 

Last game I ran at maximum settings was The Witcher 2.

I recently installed Shadow of Mordor and was able to run it at high settings with tessellation turned off and shadows low (50-60fps). The recommended specs for that game are a little bit higher than the ones for DA:I, so I'm assuming my PC will run the game at least at those settings, am I right?

Thanks in advance,

 

I own an GTX560Ti before and in no way it can max out The Witcher 2 and what's more 1080p. GTX560Ti is a very old card. I seriously recommend you to upgrade to at least GTX970 or R9 290X to at least last you few years down the road and i can safely say you can most likely play most games on very high settings 1080p 60fps. Of course no max out AA. It will still be fine win a lower 2xMSAA.

[Timate]

I don't know I run Bf4 with everything on ultra no lag at all with a GTX750 with a I-7 and 12GB ram doubt you need much better then that however the GTX750 just did have a update for the driver it fleshed it out a little bit more so now it feels even more smooth.

[janddran]

Not sure see how well that runs on Bf4 I know GTX 750 can run Bf4 on ultra so I will be fine on DAI not sure how well a GTX 570 will run I have heard it being better then the Gtx660 but not really sure. If anything decrease your resolution that will increase your FPS it will make things more jagged though but I use a TV so I don't really have to worry about being jagged it's more fleshed out on a large tv.

 

The 570 GTX is not better than the 660 GTX. The math doesn't support it in their respective architecture nor do the apples vs. apples (game) benchmarks. All things being equal in systems -- which isn't the case - one can expect 15-25 more FPS (can be higher or lower) with the latter depending on the game.

www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/647?vs=518

[Dragon Age Inquisition]

Will I be able to run this on low of I'm running The Witcher 2 on medium/high? Witcher 2 is a really demanding game and people say it's badly otimized. Bioware dev said in one of the DAI videos that the game will be optimized for both low end and high end PCs. 

 

Here's The Witcher 2 system requirements : 

 

AMD CPU: Phenom II X4 970

AMD GPU: Radeon HD 4850

RAM 4 GB

 

 

DAI Minimum : 

 

AMD quad core CPU @ 2.5 GHz

AMD Radeon HD 4870

RAM 4 GB

 

So, will I be able to run DAI on lowest if I can run The Witcher 2 smoothly on medium/high? I'm just really curious because I want to pre order the game, but I've bought 4 games which I can't play in the last 2 months. 

 

[BananaDePijama]

I'm surprised!

 

This game seen to be well optimized, the requirements seem to be a little lower than Battlefield 4...

 

The way i'm seeing anyone that has a mid/ almost high-end gaming rig, like a FX - 6300 (Overclocked) and a R9 270X will be able to handle the new Dragon Age smoothly on Ultra settings, i mean this same settings can handle Battlefield 4 at 1080p and Ultra (40+ FPS).

 

My Tri-X R9 290X will arrive tomorrow, OMG dat feels... 

[Dutch]

Not sure see how well that runs on Bf4 I know GTX 750 can run Bf4 on ultra so I will be fine on DAI not sure how well a GTX 570 will run I have heard it being better then the Gtx660 but not really sure. If anything decrease your resolution that will increase your FPS it will make things more jagged though but I use a TV so I don't really have to worry about being jagged it's more fleshed out on a large tv.

 

a 750 can run bf4 on ultra? What resolution are you using and frames are you getting? 

[Lucidae]

Ultra for me

Ermahgawd what website is that?

I have a core i7
Nvidia gtx 660 with 2 gigs
8 gigs of ram

Wanting to figure out how high I can run the game with 30 FPS+

[Timate]

I run it at 1360 x 768 I have  a 32 inch tv I forget the FPS I would have to load it up again but it's not enough to really notice at least for me it's not less than 30 that's for sure you feel anything under 30. The game runs smooth for me. People seem to always want to make there resolution bigger I never really notice the difference honestly maybe that's just me however you do increase your FPS by lowering your resolution. My roommate has a weaker card then I do and runs BF4 on ultra his resolution is about the same.

 

I have watched videos on others on BF4 and there seems to lag and the only thing I ever can come up with is either it's there resolution cpu or ram.

[janddran]

Ermahgawd what website is that?

I have a core i7
Nvidia gtx 660 with 2 gigs
8 gigs of ram

Wanting to figure out how high I can run the game with 30 FPS+

 

The site is http://www.systemreq...ntslab.com/cyri

 

It is not entirely accurate. The accuracy doesn't take computer setup (beyond basics) and tweaking in account and Devs vary on how accurate their requirements are (e.g. Recommended usually means High Settings but not always) Since Inquisition also uses AMD Mantle, for instance, some people will be able to run the game below spec (CPU-wise) and that happens all the time anyway.

 

A 660 GTX should be able to run mostly high/ultra mix, but for better performance things like AA should be turned down. I have one (the OC edition) and it does the job well, and I don't find any bottlenecks with it (I don't require 60FPS in a game). Next-gen games will be the problem and thankfully this one isn't.

 

We won't know until release/early release the full scope but for tweaking purposes, this is good information: I wouldn't trust GeForce Experience settings until the game has been out awhile, and even then...

http://lifehacker.co...aphics-settings