It is what is likely to happen. I cannot say for sure what would happen if the mages were freed, but I can say what would be the most likely scenario. The common folk do have a strong fear of magic and mages (not without reason) and without some sort of system to keep things in check, it is highly likely that extremist organizations would rise up and decide that all mages need to be killed (kind of like the Red Templars...)
You're arguing for what's morally right. Fear rarely leads to rational, moral actions. Many mundanes fear mages. We've been told this in every Dragon Age game we've played. This fear went from "I don't like that mage, he could be up to something" to "Oh gods please don't blow me up!" following Anders' little stunt.
Frightened people are well known to act impulsively, and rarely in support of the object of their fears. Viviene understands this, which is why she is rather upset that the vote to split from the Chantry even happened. Because it only increased that fear, and thus made life in Thedas for mages more dangerous.
Fair? Not at all. But it is reality. A reality Viviene understands all too well.
Fair enough view point that I can understand but I never said all mages should be free. I just said that we don't know what would happen if they were free.
You can't assume that everything would go horribly wrong and just use that as a reason to persecute an entire race. I think that the system of the Circles and Templars is the right way to go about the mage situation but it needs to be seriously reformed; it can't be the same way as it was - essentially a prison.





Retour en haut





