I don't buy into the idea that there's something preferable about a love interest that's only interested in my gender. It seems kind of possessive to me. Among other things.
If it were about evening out the representation, then both the gay and bisexual LIs have yet to include this archetype. ::shrug:: I have no dog in that particular fight, but I'm in the little-tiny-group that considered DA2's approach fantastic.
Heh, they can't be too possessive, I mean... Cassandra has romanced a thousand Lavellans, Cadashes, Adaars, and Trevelyans by now. Sorry, my lame humour.
For me, admittedly, it's a combination of representation (which seems to be like a cuss word nowadays) and wishing for something different. But I don't want to expect it. What I'd expect, though, is that they can't go back to the "Origins" style of romantic interests where if you're playing an LGBT+ protagonist, you're most likely to be locked into just one option. Romance aside, I suppose it all boils down to what do the writers feel like writing and what they haven't written about yet. And with what's been said, we'll definitely see more queer characters and companions to come. It's just a question on what they'll be like. I'm a little saddened with David Gaider leaving Dragon Age since most of my favourite characters in the series were written by him.
I liked DAII's approach not just because it felt fair for four love-interests, but that the romance subplots were rationed out over three acts. Whereas in Inquisition, you could pretty much breeze through it and that part of the story would be almost over even before the middle of the game.





Retour en haut






