I originally replied to the wrong post...oops haha...
Please see my above response to Sandal, as I completely agree with you.
and to quote myself:
You criticize Aveline and Cassandra for displaying a "softer side." You commented that you just want a woman who 'gets s*** done.'
It is precisely the negative correlation of the words feminine, sensitive, and weak that make me so intrigued as to what veeia's thoughts are.
I think in this case it's the fact that the common portrayal of women in media and especially the fantasy/action genres is the fact that they need someone (usually a man) in order to do the heavy lifting.
For instance, in pretty much any other game, Cassandra would have been a male character, because of not only her attitude, but also her affiliation with the Seekers themselves. It's a very masculine role and there are very few women who have been depicted in such ways, not just in games, but across all media. Unfortunately, the majority of those women who are put into masculine role are justified in those roles because they are "less than woman" e.g. more man than woman, and the most cost effective way to do this in a limited time is to make her a lesbian. Like "Look at this woman here, she's an [insert occupation here] no real woman would ever truly be interested in doing this, so she has to be like men."
To me, this is related to the unwillingness of *straight men to acknowledge that a feminine woman would ever be interested in another woman (because women have to justify not wanting or being attracted to a man) and therefore the prevalence of most fictional lesbian women being only lesbian until the main male character comes along, or if she is actually bisexual, then she is the feminine, conventionally attractive, unassuming type, more akin to Lelianna and Josephine. Not that I have any objection to those two, or their type, but just an observation. Which then pushes the problem into a new area: because a butch, more masculine woman was seen as a derogatory or inflaming stereotype, there is reluctance to portray one in a story because then she is seen as not her own character, but a cheap and easy way to fill in a slot.
To bring this back around to my original intent, these more feminine characters are usually sidelined in favor of a masculine hero, and then relegated to background noise with no agency of their own. Again, I say usually, because as we can clearly see, Bioware certainly does not engage in this practice. Therefore it was disheartening when Cassandra was not at least bisexual, and I would argue Vivienne as well, because if the case can be made for non heterosexual women, then the same can be true of women of color regardless of their sexuality. Although, it could be argued that Vivienne may be a stronger character because she can't be romanced.
There's more to come, but family lunch is happening,
*straight refers to the societal heterosexual man, not every one ever in existance