Correct.
EA made Origin for a reason.
But with Origin, steam gets zero actual income of 30-40% of "sale tax" (not sure if that is the proper wording).
If Valve and EA settled on 5-10% of the revenue, and EA allowed steam to sell it for that price (30-40% is - TBH - pure theft), then EA would much more likely allow steam to also sell their game. Meaning both EA and Valve would earn more money in the long run. There are a LOT of steam users that might not use Origin, and steam advertises its games and provides another position of possible sales. The logical choice would be for EA and Valve to agree on a percentage, this would benefit both and hurt neither. Is there a economical / marketing rule I'm overlooking here? Seems illogical that EA and Valve does not WANT to make money and a small percentage of sale revenue instead of a gigantic one like 30-40% would please both parts?