And I still can't figure out if Casey Hudson's intent with that was to make Synthesis the best ending (because the Reapers are actually good in his eyes) or make it a bad choice, but present it purposefully as the best option because that's the Catalyst's/Reapers' opinion.
I always felt like it was presented as the best option because Bioware thought it was the best solution, not realising how counter it is to everything we've fought for and how wrong it is in general, not to mention Bioware not recognizing the fact that Synthetics and Organics being the main theme was extremely hamfisted and didn't have enough empirical evidence throughout to be believable.
But part of me thinks maybe this is all a trick, especially after how much they managed to subvert parts of the ending in the Extended Cut not to mention a lot of the added dialogue with the Catalyst can also be found in the leaked script from November 2011.
I like to give Mac Walters a lot of flack mainly because Foundation comics sucked and because ME3's main parts, especially the intro and endings sucked but also because whenever I get to hear Mac talk publically he seems like... to be quite blunt, not very smart, but who knows? Maybe he is very passionate and analytical about his own writing but he's instead he's just very bad orally.
Clearly, Synthesis was an idea conveived by Casey and/or Mac looking at what Saren said in ME1 "Organics and Machines intertwined! A union of flesh and steel. The strengths of both; the weaknesses of neither!", but it's whether Bioware really thought the choice was supposed to be beautiful, good or satisfying as opposed to wrong, deceiving, unethical, weird etc. is another question that I can't quite wrap my head around.





Retour en haut





