I remember reading this in a Dragon Age book that the high seeker started the mage-templar war so why do they try so stop it now?
Were not the seekers the one who started the mage-templar war?
#1
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 12:05
#2
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 12:07
Because they've split up.
#3
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 12:15
"Following the conflict at the White Spire, Lambert cancels the Nevarran Accord, severing ties between the Seekers and the Chantry. Allegiances between Seekers and Templars are split. Some still support the Divine"
#4
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 12:16
So we are gonna play the ones who support the chantry?
#5
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 12:27
Well, the Inquisitor him/herself is gonna be regarded as a religious figure what with the title "Herald of Andraste" and all. You can probably disagree with the Chantry and maybe even outright oppose it, but we'll see.
Oh and the original Inquisition itself in dragon age lore was a religious faction:
-100 Ancient
"The Inquisition is founded around this time. The loose association of Andrastian hard-liners hunt heretics and mages in the name of the Maker."
Hope that helped.
#6
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 12:38
No, the mages did.
- Master Warder Z_ aime ceci
#7
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 12:45
Anders did.
#9
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 12:56
We aren't seekers,
We have 2 seekers us and most of our first forces are the seekers and templars that came from kirkwall with Cassandra and Cullen, but as a organization we are separate from the Chantry, the Templars, and The seekers.
But for all we know the seekers are nonexistent in this war.
But some Templars and Seekers were loyal to the Divine and not Lambart and that was the group in Kirkwall with Cassandra.
In a sense Cassandra is a Traitor to the Seekers.
- Demigod7 aime ceci
#10
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 12:58
Pretty much what Eluvianus said, it wasn't just one thing that lead to war. I think the Lambert rebelling and seperating Seekers and templars from the Chantry was final nail in the coffin, it just took away any chance of compromise at the moment. I think each happening just light up whole conflict: Anders bombing up Chantry in Kirkwall and Kirkwall Circle that got annulled, more Circles got annulled and some rebelled, Seekers and templars breaking away from Chantry's control etc.
#11
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 01:15
Pretty much what Eluvianus said, it wasn't just one thing that lead to war. I think the Lambert rebelling and seperating Seekers and templars from the Chantry was final nail in the coffin, it just took away any chance of compromise at the moment. I think each happening just light up whole conflict: Anders bombing up Chantry in Kirkwall and Kirkwall Circle that got annulled, more Circles got annulled and some rebelled, Seekers and templars breaking away from Chantry's control etc.
Don't forget the mage's vote. they did vote for the war pretty much.
#12
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 01:21
Don't forget the mage's vote. they did vote for the war pretty much.
no they voted to leave the oppression of the circles behind. Evidence suggests the Divine was involved in push towards the independence vote.
Templars then cracked the shits, told the Divine to shove her authority and went on killing spree.
Blood thirsty drug addicts.
- lil yonce, Who Knows, LaughingWolf et 1 autre aiment ceci
#13
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 01:24
no they voted to leave the oppression of the circles behind. Evidence suggests the Divine was involved in push towards the independence vote.
Templars then cracked the shits, told the Divine to shove her authority and went on killing spree.
Blood thirsty drug addicts.
Nevertheless, their decision to go to war in earnest, instead of surrendering, is why the war is still going on in Inquisition.
#14
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 01:33
no they voted to leave the oppression of the circles behind. Evidence suggests the Divine was involved in push towards the independence vote.
Templars then cracked the shits, told the Divine to shove her authority and went on killing spree.
Blood thirsty drug addicts.
I wasn't saying it was right or wrong, i was stating they did make the choice to war with the templars, even if it be the right, wrong, selfish, smart, or last thing they could do. it was still their choice.
#15
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 01:35
Nevertheless, their decision to go to war in earnest, instead of surrendering, is why the war is still going on in Inquisition.
no their decision was to flee, which is what they did. the Templars were the ones that went on a butchering spree. to deal with mages "as they see fit" without any oversight. the Magi are merely defending themselves. from lyrium addicts.
- lil yonce et Who Knows aiment ceci
#16
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 01:37
no their decision was to flee, which is what they did. the Templars were the ones that went on a butchering spree. to deal with mages "as they see fit" without any oversight. the Magi are merely defending themselves. from lyrium addicts.
And they could have voted to surrender. They didn't. I'm not saying anything about the morality of it, but they could have ended the crisis by surrendering.
#17
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 01:37
no their decision was to flee, which is what they did. the Templars were the ones that went on a butchering spree. to deal with mages "as they see fit" without any oversight. the Magi are merely defending themselves. from lyrium addicts.
Ok that is a blatant under exaggeration of their impact in the war, do remember, its not just the templars burning villages to the ground.
#18
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 01:38
I wasn't saying it was right or wrong, i was stating they did make the choice to war with the templars, even if it be the right, wrong, selfish, smart, or last thing they could do. it was still their choice.
see above their choice was to LEAVE it was the templars choice to reject the chantry and start a protracted conflict. the templars had a choice let them go and sort something new out, instead they rejected the divine and went on a killing spree.
- Who Knows aime ceci
#19
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 01:40
And they could have voted to surrender. They didn't. I'm not saying anything about the morality of it, but they could have ended the crisis by surrendering.
that isn't a vote for war, it's a vote to survive. the aggressors in this conflict are the templars either side can point to the other for push factors all they like. the fact is the war started with one decision. the templars rejecting the divine and going on a witch hunt.
- Who Knows aime ceci
#20
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 01:40
see above their choice was to LEAVE it was the templars choice to reject the chantry and start a protracted conflict. the templars had a choice let them go and sort something new out, instead they rejected the divine and went on a killing spree.
The Templars chose to break away from the Chantry, yes, but so did the mages.
#21
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 01:41
Meredith started this whole war. If we would have just killed Ander for what HE done and made him an example, all would have been right. But that crazy women was blood thirsty and she created this entire disaster.
#22
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 01:43
Nope: (This post contains spoilers: Parental Discretion is Advised)
1) Anders blows up a Chantry
2) First attempted assassination on the Divine.
3) *New Info* Nobles and Commoners cried out for something to do something.
4) Second assassination attempt on the Divine.
5) Lambert doesn't take make crap and refuses to relent to their demands.
6) Adrian frames Rhys for a murder.
7) Mages are locked up and freed by Divine/Leliana.
8) Lambert freaks.
9) Mage War.
#23
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 01:43
Ok that is a blatant under exaggeration of their impact in the war, do remember, its not just the templars burning villages to the ground.
we're talking about what started it. it's not up for debate the decision was made by lambert when he rejecting the divine abolished the nevarran accord and started hunting people down like animals.
- LaughingWolf aime ceci
#24
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 01:45
Meredith started this whole war. If we would have just killed Ander for what HE done and made him an example, all would have been right. But that crazy women was blood thirsty and she created this entire disaster.
Not rly she wanted pull of RoA on circle that was corrupted from the top to the the bottom there were many reasons for that war like divine and mages plus system was horrible because of too much freedom mages had.
#25
Posté 30 octobre 2014 - 01:45
Who has the advantage in this war? Who I think will lose its importance in the first 3 hours of the game because I think a bigger threat will appear.





Retour en haut







