Mordigan wrote...
You can't call those methods bunk, without even understanding the methods they used in the first place..
Besides, the 2 to 4% range are the most commonly cited figures from numerous studies in different countries..
We're not just talking about one study here, as was the case for Kinsey, but several.
Of course, if all those studies are flawed in the same way, then the average is flawed too. But sure, 2-4% is a much better guess than Kinsey's. Personally, I just go with 5% and call it a day.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




