"Bad" and "Evil" are, in this context, useless terms. The subjectively is too inherent in each of them, and people have debated and rationalized the degree to which the Reapers and Saren are "bad" since the beginning.
They're antagonists. Much simpler that way.
...OP, your point is weird.
Coming back to this. When TIM says he will pursue his goals "By Any Means Necessary", that's as strong an admission of evil as it gets in my book (his actions showing that he truly meant what he said). He was evil before Sovereign or any other reaper ever got to him.
The Catalyst tries the same logic you are by comparing the Reapers to a force of nature like fire. That comparison fails though, because fire does not have self-awareness or make conscious choices, while the Reapers are and do. It doesn't matter whether a person believes they are evil or not - actions are what we judge others by.
Saying the Reapers are just following their programming is exactly the defense the Nazi's used at the Nuremberg Trials: "Just Following Orders". The series clearly states that AI can go beyond their own programming and "evolve", just like any other living thing. EDI reprogramming her own self-preservation code would be a prime example.
Sticking even closer to the thread topic and title, a "bad guy" - ie: the antagonist, doesn't have to be evil. Misguided or even misinformed can work just as well. It would be closer to the truth to say Mass Effect has no "good guys", meaning no one is a pure paragon of virtue - they're all selfish and come with their own sets of other flaws. Legion is probably the most "good", with his willing self-sacrifice to awaken the rest of the Geth, though how dying exactly accomplished that is never really explained.
That's a really interesting take on it. I feel like I'm back in film studies class.
Deja vu is nice sometimes.





Retour en haut






