@wcholcombe & @hillbillyhat -I never found the video with the quests you brought up (horse trader etc.), but it sounds good the way you tell it. What I'm hoping to see with sidequests are more integration into the main plot and a lot more story content and dialogue. No 'I need so-and-so, and I can pay' stuff without more dialogue to give real context. I'm not saying it's not there. I'm saying I hope it is. DA2 had a lot of 'I'll pay!' type sidequests, which was the point of comparison. In DA:O, even the chanter's board quests usually had decent context by text or dialogue or both, and story context for the chanter's one line responses, which were funny. DA2's version was just a random item and a random return, albeit with some amusing befuddlement.
@Meltemph -Combat- I love the stronger tactical elements, the emphasis on what I called "battlefield tactics" when I asked for them, and the more interesting level and encounter design, that whole package. What I was referring to as less "crafted", what bums me out about it, are the action gamey mechanics that got all those huge threads: the attack trigger, the 8 ability slot limit, and the unsynched attack chains with no auto defense (so the basic combat is more interesting to watch and build stats for, and I can just focus on the tactics). I play mostly real time, so hopefully I can play the whole thing real time in tac cam, because I'm not doing the attack trigger, and hopefully we've got extensive custom tactics programming available (which was the bit of most recent info I was referring to), because my playstyle will be pretty much extinct if not. That's where I'm worried, so when I hear 'actioney combat', that's pretty much exactly what I'm worried about.
edit: Will do, for non-spoilery reviews. I'm trying not to spoil myself in the last week though. I bought the game months ago. 
haha, yes they are getting it, but willfully filtering out anything that doesnt support their whining. /snip/ Honestly many people are absolutely intent on despising anything bioware does, and switch back and forth between reasons and justifications to do so, even if said reasons contradict the previous ones, and no matter how deluded or devoid of rationality they are.
I was never whining.
I was just saying this little pseudo review video seems honest and fair enough, and I agree with the reviewers themselves that it's not nearly large enough a sample size to make a critical judgement about anything, really. These kind of knee jerk irrational attacks on anything that's not completely promotional bug me. I don't like it when people pile on and mob somebody because they don't completely agree with you. And I like sober opinions in review media.
I also don't like being mischaracterized. I'm sure it's not thrilling for them either. Ho-hum as it is. I expect it.