Aller au contenu

Photo

Will you use force, secrecy or diplomacy?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
134 réponses à ce sujet

#126
Doominike

Doominike
  • Members
  • 906 messages

I find the idea of using force only to be incredibly hilarious

The qunari are force only and they nearly kicked conquered all of Thedas in the past, just saying



#127
Pierce Miller

Pierce Miller
  • Members
  • 1 026 messages

The qunari are force only and they nearly kicked conquered all of Thedas in the past, just saying

I meant hilarious in the sense of I'm definitely doing it forever and always. Too much fun, The idea of diplomacy is especially horrifying though.


  • Doominike aime ceci

#128
The Baconer

The Baconer
  • Members
  • 5 678 messages

All of them. I prefer the "iron fist in a velvet glove" approach.


  • ewauksonian aime ceci

#129
ewauksonian

ewauksonian
  • Members
  • 142 messages

All of them. I prefer the "iron fist in a velvet glove" approach.

This. Oh, and whichever is more effective when available. 



#130
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 914 messages

The qunari are force only and they nearly kicked conquered all of Thedas in the past, just saying

No they aren't. They show clear willingness to use secrecy in MotA.



#131
Doominike

Doominike
  • Members
  • 906 messages

Secrecy in their case seems more like scouting before using force, or is that just how I view secrecy ? Sneaking is more like a variant of violence than a separate thing imo, assassination isn't "not force" just because people don't see it, you still used violence to solve your problem. And spying does nothing by itself, you spy to learn about your target before you use force

 

As for my "I don't need advisors" argument, I guess I'm just that good at multitasking that I don't get how it would hard or impossible to do without. It would also help if they were given more appropriate titles. If you say Leliana is important because she trains the spies then she should be the spy trainer, not the secrecy advisor. 

 

Eh whatever, I can always just ignore them. 



#132
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 914 messages

Secrecy in their case seems more like scouting before using force, or is that just how I view secrecy ? Sneaking is more like a variant of violence than a separate thing imo, assassination isn't "not force" just because people don't see it, you still used violence to solve your problem. And spying does nothing by itself, you spy to learn about your target before you use force

 

As for my "I don't need advisors" argument, I guess I'm just that good at multitasking that I don't get how it would hard or impossible to do without. It would also help if they were given more appropriate titles. If you say Leliana is important because she trains the spies then she should be the spy trainer, not the secrecy advisor. 

 

Eh whatever, I can always just ignore them. 

Assassination is under Leiliana's purview, though. So, for this purpose it's Secrecy rather than Force. And she trains the spies, too. I think this makes her a good deal more than an adviser too, but that's what she's called.



#133
Doominike

Doominike
  • Members
  • 906 messages

No I mean, yes it's called Secrecy and it's Leliana's job in the game, I was talking in concept, I don't consider "secrecy" a separate thing, just a variant of force



#134
DarthCaine

DarthCaine
  • Members
  • 7 175 messages

Sarcasm



#135
Silver Souls

Silver Souls
  • Members
  • 466 messages

I love diplomacy so i will be doing that first then maybe secrecy not a huge fan of military though