With no sense of humour at all. If Bioware permits it, my Inquisitor will take any humour attempts literally ("Oh, you're so hungry you could eat a horse? Well, I'm sorry Bull, we can't spare any horses today, we need them for the Inquisition...")
So kinda like Drax ?
Wild women. Rippin' and tearin'.
I don't know who that is and now I feel awkward, but umm, yes? :sSo kinda like Drax ?
I don't know who that is and now I feel awkward, but umm, yes? :s
This dude from Guardians of the Galaxy
He has no concept of metaphors, totally literal minded, which is close enough
Sounds about right thenThis dude from Guardians of the Galaxy
He has no concept of metaphors, totally literal minded, which is close enough
Before or after the freak out, mine will probably do the right thing even though it may cause problems down the line.
Well, I'm going to name my first Inquisitor Optimus Prime. So, I'm going to make him diplomatic as he can bee until someone ***** with him or freedom. Then, it's enemies faces being ripped off and shoved down their throats.
My second Inquisitor will probably me a reflection of me. Meaning, he'll probably be really mean and condescending towards everyone and everything, because he just doesn't give a damn about you or your feelings. He'll still try to do the right thing, though. But not if it means compromising anything he stands for.
My first time through, my inquisitor will be super nice to just about everyone, even those she kills.
If my run of The Last Court is anything to go by? Poorly.
My Inquisitor is going to start out kind of cautious, and doubting herself. She's going to make decisions that more sturdy personalities might disagree with. She's going to try to please everyone (or as many people as possible), which will probably eventually backfire on her; then she'll harden and start making more important decisions with less regard for how other parties like them. I'm always going to try to play her as a good/honorable character, but she may sometimes make decisions that take more of a hardline, and she may not be as self-sacrificing as my Warden (literally did every single side quest that was asked of me in DA: O). Hopefully, she'll grow to be fully independent and confident in herself, and not care about making enemies, or saying 'no' to people, although she'll always hold the opinions of her Inquisition members in higher regard, and may end up making decisions depending on the make up of her party at the time... XD.
Basically take a chaotic good stance towards decisions(i.e. refusing to compromise values and ideology for "the greater good"). Consequences of that remain to be seen until the game comes out.
First playthrough would be a naive, sheltered (pro-mage) human female (mage), who would grow to play 'dirty' as the rest of them while always trying to do the 'right' thing.
Second playthrough would be a rogue human female who's a devout believer (pro-templar) but knew to play the 'game' based on her upbringing in circle of 'nobles. She would always try to get her way, and her way will always be decided by her devout belief.
Ima do whatever Cass says. Don't wanna mess with her
As I always play; doing good where able but always with the big picture in mind. If you have to kill an innocent to save a city, so be it. But he can also be corrupted, take my banner for instance; all goodie goodie and then BOOM corrupted ashes right in the middle there, cause tempt me with dragon blood powers and YES PLEASE 
I am sort of wondering what it would be like if Patton and Churchill had a love child and it deigned to be my Quizzie ... fun times 
Ruthless in his attempt at closing ALL the rifts, definitely. He won't waste his time on things that aren't relevant to the crisis, but if something comes up that could have consequences later on and doesn't take him out of his way then he'll usually do the right thing. He'll help people in imminent mortal danger if at all possible, but the Inquisition can't afford to pursue wild goose-chases.
Retour en haut
