"Extra effort needed to render his full body"
Right. Not like the extra effort needed to fully render Triss, or Ves completely naked.
Play TW2. I'm not sure how difficult you realize animating someone taking their pants off in a video game, but it's a programming nightmare and wouldn't look right. The best CDPR was able to do was take off Geralt's belt. He isn't a Sorceress like Triss, so he can't just magically take his clothes off. We also never see his pants on when he in the actual act of the sexual intercourse. The camera is framed in such a way to give us the illusion that he is not wearing pants.
Nudity, maybe. But romance? I played both Witcher games and I liked both of them, but let's not forget the "brilliant" sex cards in the first game.
Also, maybe it's just me, but something about the line "pioneer of nudity in games" makes me laugh.
And also, in the spirit of keeping the thread on topic, I just want to say that I really couldn't care less if there's nudity in Inquisition or not. Has zero to do with my enjoyment of the game.
CDPR has already admitted to handly the sex cards in TW1 poorly and they were not implemented correctly. The fact people continue to hound on this when that game was released seven years ago...
What's so funny about CDPR willing to do what few others will do? BioWare included.
Again, there will be nudity somewhere between ME1 and TW2. It will be short and sweet and show some butts and breasts. Anything more with romance and you are getting dangerously close to receiving an AO-rating. CDPR pushes it as far as they possibly can go.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





