556 réponses à ce sujet

[Cylan Cooper]

Because devs always tell the truth right?

They don't, which was my point with the McReary comment.

 

How so? Did they not say there will be GTA IV characters in GTA V? 

They said there would be no GTA IV characters in V. People were asking about the protagonists and Dan Houser specifically brought up Packie McReary and said he wouldn't come back. Next thing you know, you encounter him in a random event and he signs up to do the big heist missions with you.

 

But if a dev is going to fib, I'd much rather it be a fib like this than something like "Yeah this feature is TOTALLY going to be in the game." And then it's not there after it's heavily marketed as being there. And yes, I'm aware that stuff doesn't always work out and development costs sometime dictates that features get cut.

[KaiserShep]

Ahh... the Experienced Female voice. That was mine as well. Best voice option in my opinion. 
 
 
 
I would probably pay top dollar for a satisfying DLC with the Warden. It seems like that would be a good compromise. That way people who don't want to see their warden or don't want them to be portrayed wrong, don't have to get the DLC. They could just add an area to the Keep that asks : In one word, describe the Hero of Ferelden's Personality: Stoic, Sarcastic, or Sadistic.

I feel the same way.

I actually chose the violent voice for my Warden. Maybe some lines are the same

[Decepticon Leader Sully]

"Hi im the Warden.. Why yes i do speak in floating text... yes i do know it is strange.... actualy it is an inhereted disorder my great grandfather could only speak in Videos of cats."

[KC_Prototype]

They don't, which was my point with the McReary comment.

 

They said there would be no GTA IV characters in V. People were asking about the protagonists and Dan Houser specifically brought up Packie McReary and said he wouldn't come back. Next thing you know, you encounter him in a random event and he signs up to do the big heist missions with you.

 

But if a dev is going to fib, I'd much rather it be a fib like this than something like "Yeah this feature is TOTALLY going to be in the game." And then it's not there after it's heavily marketed as being there. And yes, I'm aware that stuff doesn't always work out and development costs sometime dictates that features get cut.

Really, I remember them saying some GTA IV will return except the main ones. But then along came Johnny.

[Cylan Cooper]

Really, I remember them saying some GTA IV will return except the main ones. But then along came Johnny.

Along came the bit of brain on Trevor's boot, yes.

 

Here's what Houser said:

 

Will we see characters from GTA IV show up in GTA V?
Packie’s not in it. There may be the odd… They tend to be very small. The problem is that… You touched on this earlier. Because of a lot of the choices… We’ve never had a game where we’ve annihilated so much of the cast. I loved Roman, but he may or may not be dead depending on what choices you made. It would be difficult to bring him back.

So many of them were killed that we didn’t really have a large amount of the main cast left over. There may or may not be a few guest appearances. Some really subtle ones for people to find. Little Easter eggs for people.

[KC_Prototype]

Along came the bit of brain on Trevor's boot, yes.

 

Here's what Houser said:

Ah, I see. I could of swore in 2012 he said some would be in the game. And yes, Johnny dying was sad, f*ck Ashley.

[GDog89]

To help clarify its probably to HOF is he surivived to become Warden Commander they probably meant the warden wont appear as they were in DAO but never confirmed DAA as a no

[Bueford89]

I like the warden and i like hawke.but as the sole purpose of the grey wardens being to deal with the blight it wouldnt make much sense to have the warden in a game where there wasnt a blight or major darkspawn related story.I would rather they brought him back farther down the road than stick him in a story where he has no relavence to the plot

[thesuperdarkone2]

Supposedly somebody got a leak where

Spoiler

apparently we are saved by a hooded/masked warden who is same gender and race as the imported warden if they lived

. don't know how true it is

[Cyr8]

I'm going to report the OP for putting the spoiler in the title. This section is supposed to prevent that. You put SPOILER and then SPOIL it in the contents of the thread. You don't put the spoiler in the title of the thread after SPOILER.

[AceHalberd]

I'm going to report the OP for putting the spoiler in the title. This section is supposed to prevent that. You put SPOILER and then SPOIL it in the contents of the thread. You don't put the spoiler in the title of the thread after SPOILER.

What.

[KaiserShep]

Couldn't the Hero of Ferelden continue to be a mute? Only this time the game acknowledges that she's actually mute.

 

"I spoke to the Hero of Ferelden once, but I don't remember a thing that she said. It's like she said something, but didn't. Maker, am I going mad?"

[Cyr8]

What.

Yes, this is the SPOILER forum, but people still post non-spoiler things. I should be able to peruse this forum for topics that aren't story spoilers. The ones with spoilers are supposed to say SPOILER and then include the spoiler in the body of the thread, not in the title.

[SomeUsername]

Basically

 

But they are gonna have to do a voice for him/her, and there is too many possibilities. Idk... I want it to happen but I don't believe it will unfortunately. 

[Bueford89]

Yes, this is the SPOILER forum, but people still post non-spoiler things. I should be able to peruse this forum for topics that aren't story spoilers. The ones with spoilers are supposed to say SPOILER and then include the spoiler in the body of the thread, not in the title.

Well if it says spoiler in the title and its posted in the spolier sub section i would imagine people would know there is a small chance it might in fact contain a spoiler or 2.   

[KC_Prototype]

Supposedly somebody got a leak where

Spoiler

apparently we are saved by a hooded/masked warden who is same gender and race as the imported warden if they lived

. don't know how true it is

Please be true!

[The Grinning Shark]

Yes, this is the SPOILER forum, but people still post non-spoiler things. 

 

Sure, people post "non-spoiler things", but everyone comes here with the intention of seeing spoilers. 

 

I should be able to peruse this forum for topics that aren't story spoilers. 

 

Then don't pursue topics that cover story spoilers. The title should give you a hint. Like this one, "Regarding the Warden in DA:I". It doesn't tell you anything, but lets you know what the thread is about so you can decide whether you want to be spoiled or not. 

 

The ones with spoilers are supposed to say SPOILER and then include the spoiler in the body of the thread, not in the title.

 

You weren't spoiled by anything at all with the title. Did you know what the Warden's role was? Did you find out if he/she was or wasn't in DA:I? No. You literally learned nothing from the title. The thread title was done correctly because it spoiled nothing. The Warden is the subject. The only thing the moderators will do is suggest you head over to the original forum called, "Scuttlebutt (NO Spoilers)". 

[Shadow Fox]

I'm going to report the OP for putting the spoiler in the title. This section is supposed to prevent that. You put SPOILER and then SPOIL it in the contents of the thread. You don't put the spoiler in the title of the thread after SPOILER.

No a spoiler in the title would be something like: "Morrigan eats the Warden" not that the thread contains a spoiler about the Warden.

[Elite Midget]

Yes, this is the SPOILER forum, but people still post non-spoiler things. I should be able to peruse this forum for topics that aren't story spoilers. The ones with spoilers are supposed to say SPOILER and then include the spoiler in the body of the thread, not in the title.

Don't want spoilers? Than don't go to the section that literally says "Spoilers are here!".

 

If you report the OP than you're wasting everyone's time as the OP didn't break any rules. If anything you could get in trouble for abusing the Report system against an innocent.

[standardpack]

I like the warden and i like hawke.but as the sole purpose of the grey wardens being to deal with the blight it wouldnt make much sense to have the warden in a game where there wasnt a blight or major darkspawn related story.I would rather they brought him back farther down the road than stick him in a story where he has no relavence to the plot

 

Corypheus says hi.

[robertthebard]

Corypheus says hi.

Hi. What does that have to do with the Warden? They never met. He's tainted, but he's not exactly like any Darkspawn we've met, including the Architect, I mean, if we take the lore to heart, he's the grand daddy of all Darkspawn, but since he can possess a Warden, apparently, w/out killing him, he's even superior to an Old God, isn't he? Why would we want to put the Warden at risk of becoming the next puppet?

[AceHalberd]

Hi. What does that have to do with the Warden? They never met. He's tainted, but he's not exactly like any Darkspawn we've met, including the Architect, I mean, if we take the lore to heart, he's the grand daddy of all Darkspawn, but since he can possess a Warden, apparently, w/out killing him, he's even superior to an Old God, isn't he? Why would we want to put the Warden at risk of becoming the next puppet?

Quick idea; what if the Architect is actually a Magister?

And presumably they'd come up with a way to protect the Wardens from that situation. Dark Ritual Mk 2 perhaps?

[DashRashh]

But my Hero left with Morrigan (When through the eluvian in witch hunt) to be with his love and baby I wonder if I still will have this quest.. 

[robertthebard]

Quick idea; what if the Architect is actually a Magister?

And presumably they'd come up with a way to protect the Wardens from that situation. Dark Ritual Mk 2 perhaps?

Except that, if they'd come up with a way to protect the Wardens from that, we wouldn't have to clash with them? Since we do, I'd say that hasn't happened, and since the Warden and Morrigan aren't together, it's not going to. Together meaning "in the same place" as opposed to "not in a relationship".

[TheChris92]

They don't, which was my point with the McReary comment.

They said there would be no GTA IV characters in V. People were asking about the protagonists and Dan Houser specifically brought up Packie McReary and said he wouldn't come back. Next thing you know, you encounter him in a random event and he signs up to do the big heist missions with you.

But if a dev is going to fib, I'd much rather it be a fib like this than something like "Yeah this feature is TOTALLY going to be in the game." And then it's not there after it's heavily marketed as being there. And yes, I'm aware that stuff doesn't always work out and development costs sometime dictates that features get cut.

Actually, they didn't. They said the opposite, Adachi-san. They said that PS2 era characters wouldn't be in it not GTA IV characters.
It might be true that Houser denied McCreary's appearance, but in of itself, it was something he sort of blurted out without being specifically asked out to it.