The reviews vary a lot on the story, but some common ground i found was that it took a long time for the story to start being meaningful.
One review stated that after 15 hours, the bad guy tipped his hand and "stuff got real"
Another said 1/3 of the game.
Others said simular things, including that it takes a long time to start and after that, the plot seems rushed and abrupt.
now, lets no blow this out of proportion... it could be nothing, but usually common things in reviews turn out to be a real thing. What do you think of this? I hate when stories take a long time to get rolling myself.. makes me feel like I wasted 15 hours that should have been better spent on real story.
I really hope these reviews are wrong, but I doubt it. :'(
I keep seeing these "I saw this in every review" threads, and frankly, I'm skeptical. Especially since in each one there's someone posting examples that said problem is not in every review.
I watched the first hour of gameplay, and it was awesomesauce on every level. I think that constitutes part of that "first 1/5th" or whatevers.
Dragon Age:Origins took a while to hook me. I really got goosebumps when i started hearing that poem from Hespith. Even with that though, I was more of a fan of the Mass Effect story than the Dragon Age. It didn't take quite as long with DA:2 (story-wise) but there were ho-hum spots in that story as well. I guess if I rated the over-all story of both previous games as one novel, I'd give it a 7/10. A good read, but not blowing me away like, say, Tolkien or King or Martin.
It won't be hard for DA:I to improve on this story, and the atmosphere is already more immersive. Looking forward to seeing where they take us.






Retour en haut







