Question.
Why do i not realy give a fu*k about reviews except from people i know?
Question.
Why do i not realy give a fu*k about reviews except from people i know?
Question.
Why do i not realy give a fu*k about reviews except from people i know?
Answer: You shouldn't ![]()
Unless you trust the reviewer and you know they have similar taste to you. Aka you agree with them on most points...then maybe trust them. Maybe ![]()
I don't know if you worded it poorly, but if you mean the narrative being disproportionately padded out with dialogue checks and companion quests that share no relation to or affects the main plot then i agree. Hopefully DAI's overarching narrative is knitted tighter than DAO's, ME2's, DA2's (short dev cycle but still...) and ME3's.
If the plot in this game is good, it'll be the first since ME1 and Origins. Characters shouldn't be carrying the story.
I don't know if you worded it poorly, but if you mean the narrative being disproportionately padded out with dialogue checks and companion quests that share no relation to or affects the main plot then i agree. Hopefully DAI's overarching narrative is knitted tighter than DAO's, ME2's, DA2's (short dev cycle but still...) and ME3's.
That's what I meant and I had ME2 and DA2 in mind. 'Carry' was perhaps the wrong word. I feel as well the overarching plot should have more coherence and relevance than it did in those games since player choice will be affecting it. ( Hopefully).
Guest_john_sheparrd_*
because the reviewers are stupid and not making sense
DA:I will have the classic saving the World story that Bioware games always have
I'm not sure what they expected its always been about the side conflicts (Mage-Templar, Orlesian Civil War) and the characters
DA 2 wasn't epic enough for most reviewers and players now we have DA:I which is basically DA:O on steroids and still they complain
that **** makes me angry ![]()