Aller au contenu

Photo

Older Bioware games had much of what's hated about ME3, Where did it go wrong?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
64 réponses à ce sujet

#26
Linkenski

Linkenski
  • Members
  • 3 452 messages

Comparing obsidian games to Bioware games I think the line was always drawn over the fact that Obsidian usually excell more at their literary focus where Bioware usually has a wider target audience by making their games less deep thematically (or don't go into detail as much) but the character interactions are still entertaining and the action is also very important.

 

I've never played Baldur's Gate so I can't comment there, but comparing KotOR 1 to KotOR2 and Mass Effect to Alpha Protocol I think it definitely rings true that Bioware's game is more digestible for a wide audience while Obsidian are more careful in detail but makes stories that won't be everybody's cup of tea.

 

I think Mass Effect (for me) failed when the biggest influences, Drew Karpyshyn and Chris L'Etoile left after ME2 though. It showed at almost every corner of ME3, and I bet Chris L'Etoile would've reacted very passionately with refusal towards Mac and Casey's ending idea if he'd been part of ME3. Everything regarding synthetics and organics seemed completely counterpoint to what Chris had established in 1 and 2, in Mass Effect 3.


  • Cobwebmaster, dgcatanisiri, KrrKs et 1 autre aiment ceci

#27
SporkFu

SporkFu
  • Members
  • 6 921 messages

Nope. If any single game had that distinction, it would be "Planescape: Torment". Also, the BG series walked in the footsteps of Fallout, which preceded it by two years and features many of the same elements, often better realized than in the BG games.


I like you.

#28
ImaginaryMatter

ImaginaryMatter
  • Members
  • 4 163 messages

Comparing obsidian games to Bioware games I think the line was always drawn over the fact that Obsidian usually excell more at their literary focus where Bioware usually has a wider target audience by making their games less deep thematically (or don't go into detail as much) but the character interactions are still entertaining and the action is also very important.

 

I've never played Baldur's Gate so I can't comment there, but comparing KotOR 1 to KotOR2 and Mass Effect to Alpha Protocol I think it definitely rings true that Bioware's game is more digestible for a wide audience while Obsidian are more careful in detail but makes stories that won't be everybody's cup of tea.

 

BioWare games also tend to have better managing and QA testing.

 

I do wonder what would happen if Obsidian made a Mass Effect game.



#29
von uber

von uber
  • Members
  • 5 516 messages
I tried baldur's gate about 6 months ago; bounced right off it.

#30
themikefest

themikefest
  • Members
  • 21 594 messages

I've never played the game and most likely never will.



#31
SporkFu

SporkFu
  • Members
  • 6 921 messages

Games have come so far since the Baldur's Gate days. Planescape: Torment is one of my favorite games of all time. In fact, I probably played it more than the ME games -- well maybe not more, but it's damn close. But I find them very tough to get into these days. It's too bad, cuz there are some great moments in them. 



#32
ImaginaryMatter

ImaginaryMatter
  • Members
  • 4 163 messages

Games have come so far since the Baldur's Gate days. Planescape: Torment is one of my favorite games of all time. In fact, I probably played it more than the ME games -- well maybe not more, but it's damn close. But I find them very tough to get into these days. It's too bad, cuz there are some great moments in them. 

 

*puts on hipster glasses*

 

Everyone knows games made in the 90s are better than games made today.


  • Obadiah, Darks1d3, von uber et 1 autre aiment ceci

#33
sH0tgUn jUliA

sH0tgUn jUliA
  • Members
  • 16 812 messages

The whole thing about Mass Effect 3 vs the older games is the ending. I'll call this Bad Ending Theory. If Mass Effect 3 had a good ending, we would not be picking the game to pieces like this. While the  had many of the same elements of Mass Effect 3 they had far better endings. That's why they were revered.


  • SporkFu et Iakus aiment ceci

#34
SporkFu

SporkFu
  • Members
  • 6 921 messages

The whole thing about Mass Effect 3 vs the older games is the ending. I'll call this Bad Ending Theory. If Mass Effect 3 had a good ending, we would not be picking the game to pieces like this. While the had many of the same elements of Mass Effect 3 they had far better endings. That's why they were revered.

The BET works for me. Certainly seen plenty of evidence to back it up. Hell, I remember Torment getting ripped apart back in the day because
Spoiler

And it quickly turned into complaining about every little thing.

#35
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 285 messages

The whole thing about Mass Effect 3 vs the older games is the ending. I'll call this Bad Ending Theory. If Mass Effect 3 had a good ending, we would not be picking the game to pieces like this. While the  had many of the same elements of Mass Effect 3 they had far better endings. That's why they were revered.

Indeed.  I mean, Mass Effect 2 doesn't have much of a story either.  But it had an awesome ending (unless you get a lot of people killed) So the game itself was considered awesome.


  • KrrKs aime ceci

#36
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 285 messages

*puts on hipster glasses*

 

Everyone knows games made in the 90s are better than games made today.

*looks up from his second Baldur's Gate run in a year* 

 

Hmmmm?



#37
themikefest

themikefest
  • Members
  • 21 594 messages

Games have come so far since the Baldur's Gate days. Planescape: Torment is one of my favorite games of all time. In fact, I probably played it more than the ME games -- well maybe not more, but it's damn close. But I find them very tough to get into these days. It's too bad, cuz there are some great moments in them. 

Heck, they've come a long way since pong. I thought that was the best thing ever at the time. I know pong wasn't an rpg or anything, but it still was good and fun.


  • Obadiah, SporkFu et RedCaesar97 aiment ceci

#38
SporkFu

SporkFu
  • Members
  • 6 921 messages


Heck, they've come a long way since pong. I thought that was the best thing ever at the time. I know pong wasn't an rpg or anything, but it still was good and fun.

Heh, yes indeed. Pong was the best thing ever.... until Donkey Kong. 


  • RedCaesar97 et themikefest aiment ceci

#39
Farangbaa

Farangbaa
  • Members
  • 6 757 messages

Pong was thoroughly ruined for me by 'That's 70's Show'.

 

All I can think of now are smaller paddles


  • Obadiah, SporkFu, Darks1d3 et 1 autre aiment ceci

#40
Linkenski

Linkenski
  • Members
  • 3 452 messages

BioWare games also tend to have better managing and QA testing.

 

I do wonder what would happen if Obsidian made a Mass Effect game.

Better story and characters, worse gameplay and cinematography, less mainstream appeal, probably.



#41
Vazgen

Vazgen
  • Members
  • 4 961 messages

Better story and characters, worse gameplay and cinematography, less mainstream appeal, probably.

And bugs. Lots of them



#42
Humakt83

Humakt83
  • Members
  • 1 893 messages

Better story and characters, worse gameplay and cinematography, less mainstream appeal, probably.


Obsidian's characters are generally bland as hell. And I'm going to say most of their stories aren't that good either.

#43
ImaginaryMatter

ImaginaryMatter
  • Members
  • 4 163 messages

And bugs. Lots of them

 

I remember watching the credits for Fallout: New Vegas. There were two people doing the QA.

 

Possibly relevant:

 

27254.jpg


  • Obadiah, SporkFu, sH0tgUn jUliA et 3 autres aiment ceci

#44
SporkFu

SporkFu
  • Members
  • 6 921 messages

Obsidian's characters are generally bland as hell. And I'm going to say most of their stories aren't that good either.

I... uhh... yeah... okay... I got nothing. 



#45
RedCaesar97

RedCaesar97
  • Members
  • 3 846 messages

I remember watching the credits for Fallout: New Vegas. There were two people doing the QA.

 

Possibly relevant:

 

<snip>

 

I remember seeing that comic a few years ago. And as someone else pointed out at the time: Notice how BioWare writes the dialogue in both Heaven and Hell?



#46
dreamgazer

dreamgazer
  • Members
  • 15 742 messages

Obsidian's characters are generally bland as hell.


640px-FNVcompanions.jpg

Uh ...

ap5.jpg

alphaprotocol-07.jpg

1112157-t_alphaprotocol_sdcc09_walkthrtr

ap-dialogue1.jpg

... que?
  • SporkFu, sH0tgUn jUliA et Jorji Costava aiment ceci

#47
dreamgazer

dreamgazer
  • Members
  • 15 742 messages
Anyway ...

Older Bioware games had much of what's hated about ME3


Yes, yes they do.

#48
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 285 messages


Uh ...









... que?

 

No screenshot of Steven heck?  I am disappoint  ;)


  • SporkFu et dreamgazer aiment ceci

#49
dreamgazer

dreamgazer
  • Members
  • 15 742 messages

No screenshot of Steven heck?  I am disappoint  ;)


maxresdefault.jpg

YES. I am disappoint in myself.
  • SporkFu et Jorji Costava aiment ceci

#50
Jeremiah12LGeek

Jeremiah12LGeek
  • Members
  • 23 883 messages

I do have many thoughts as to what the difference was with ME 3... but I'm both tired literally (lag from travelling and weather) and figuratively (even though I came to BSN late, and for MP, I have exhausted most of my willingness to deal with ME 3's ending.)

 

Basic points only:

 

- Out of left field

 

- Directly contradicted both the marketing and spirit of the series by doing away with the significance of all choices leading up until then (they called the series "mass effect" for a reason... your choices were supposed to have a "massive effect" on the story.)

 

- Balder's Gate was a stand alone story, with the possibility of a sequel, rather than a directly continuous story that had been intended from the beginning.

 

I'll stop there. Too much to say, and there's really no point, anymore.