Comparing obsidian games to Bioware games I think the line was always drawn over the fact that Obsidian usually excell more at their literary focus where Bioware usually has a wider target audience by making their games less deep thematically (or don't go into detail as much) but the character interactions are still entertaining and the action is also very important.
I've never played Baldur's Gate so I can't comment there, but comparing KotOR 1 to KotOR2 and Mass Effect to Alpha Protocol I think it definitely rings true that Bioware's game is more digestible for a wide audience while Obsidian are more careful in detail but makes stories that won't be everybody's cup of tea.
I think Mass Effect (for me) failed when the biggest influences, Drew Karpyshyn and Chris L'Etoile left after ME2 though. It showed at almost every corner of ME3, and I bet Chris L'Etoile would've reacted very passionately with refusal towards Mac and Casey's ending idea if he'd been part of ME3. Everything regarding synthetics and organics seemed completely counterpoint to what Chris had established in 1 and 2, in Mass Effect 3.





Retour en haut











