Aller au contenu

Photo

Official Dragon Age: Inquisition PC Performance Thread (Please See OP)


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
960 réponses à ce sujet

#451
cypress88

cypress88
  • Members
  • 3 messages

@ Anzeroth

 

FX is bottlenecking you badly.



#452
dantares83

dantares83
  • Members
  • 1 140 messages

FX is bottlenecking you badly.

what is FX?



#453
niniendowarrior

niniendowarrior
  • Members
  • 1 469 messages

Yep. Confirmed that my computer cannot run it. I'll just move on.



#454
Guns90

Guns90
  • Members
  • 10 messages

So im getting pretty shoddy frame rates, by that i mean micro stuttering, being unable to maintain a flat 60fps on maximum ulta graphics or even with the AA/vsync and other stuff off/turned down. Ive tried most of the fixes floating around on the net so far with zero help. Although i dont seem to be getting this cut scene bug that everyones talking about. I get black screen freezes and CTD instead, and happening infact in specific areas or places in the game world (when i walk up to one of those shiny skull telescope things) without any error dialogue ***EDIT Just got my first dx dialogue error***

 

It seems there is something going on with the drivers or game core because my rig isnt being stressed any more than when i play BF4.

 

i7-4770k OC 4.5GHz watercooled

Crossfire HD7970 Ghz 3GB (1000MHz core/1500MHz memory), R9290X 3GB (1000/1500)

16GB RAM 1866MHz

Win 7 Premium 64bit

1920x1080 60Hz monitor

 

Ive played many games with this setup and the only ones that ive had to dial back graphics settings from maximum ultra is Crysis 3 and BF4 (AA/HBAO settings). Then they will run a flat 60 frames seamlessly without any micro stuttering, frame lag bullshit.



#455
RainyNguyen

RainyNguyen
  • Members
  • 3 messages

I have

 

i5 2500k

8 gb ram

GTX 780 Poseidon

 

I was getting 55-60 fps the entire prologue, then when i hit haven it dropped to 30 and i get 35 in hinterlands.

 

I feel like all the people claiming they get 60 fps locked in this game either didnt bother playing more than 45 minutes, or are just flat out lying.

I have same rig and same problems as you.

I5 2500k@4.5Ghz

16 GB RAM

Galaxy GTX780 HOF

 

So far no issues for me and my PC.  60+ FPS ide say 95% of the time ....lowest ive seen is mid 50s........and of course 30 during cutscenes.  No CTD yet.

 

 

- Intel Core i5-4670K Haswell Quad-Core 3.4GHz
- MSI Gaming N770 TF 2GD5/OC G-SYNC Support GeForce GTX 770 2GB
- MSI Z87-G45 Gaming LGA 1150 Intel Z87 Motherboard
- 16gb DDR3
- 1920x1080 res

 

In Game first set to ULTRA then:

-disabled AA

 

Then In NVIDIA control panel set DSR to 2x.

Did you go to Hinterlands? 



#456
Draninus

Draninus
  • Members
  • 94 messages

It hasn't been too bad for me.  I still have a lot of tweaking to do.  My GPU is more than adequate (R9 270X), however my CPU (Athlon X4 760K) could use some OC'ing.  Right now it stays solidly around 65% CPU usage, after I load a particular area with settings on the lower end.  The visuals in this game are still excellent even on lower settings IMO.

 

The most challenging part right now for me is the start-up screen and initially entering a new area.  CPU utilization is usually 95-100% during these times.  This is only really a hindrance on the start-up screen, which I find really interesting.  I would think it would be more of an issue in game.  As it stands, getting through the initial start-up screen is a bit of a crapshoot.  After that though, performance has been pretty smooth all around.  I imagine it will only get better after some tweaking plus patches Bioware.



#457
anrock

anrock
  • Members
  • 28 messages

It hasn't been too bad for me.  I still have a lot of tweaking to do.  My GPU is more than adequate (R9 270X), however my CPU (Athlon X4 760K) could use some OC'ing.  Right now it stays solidly around 65% CPU usage, after I load a particular area with settings on the lower end.  The visuals in this game are still excellent even on lower settings IMO.

 

The most challenging part right now for me is the start-up screen and initially entering a new area.  CPU utilization is usually 95-100% during these times.  This is only really a hindrance on the start-up screen, which I find really interesting.  I would think it would be more of an issue in game.  As it stands, getting through the initial start-up screen is a bit of a crapshoot.  After that though, performance has been pretty smooth all around.  I imagine it will only get better after some tweaking plus patches Bioware.

 

You should have an better performance than me. I'm playing on Medium with the Mesh quality at High with both overclocked GTX 460 and Q8300 @3.2GHz. Try to properly overclock your GPU and CPU and you'll be just fine. Keep in mind that anything below 6GB Ram is not recommended for this game tho.



#458
grognak420

grognak420
  • Members
  • 8 messages

I'm getting incredibly long load times.

On top of that, whenever I transition from area to area, the game itself freezes for a good minute or two before it starts loading said area.

I'm at my wits end with this

I've tried partitioning my hard drive

I've tried setting up a symlink and putting .cas files onto my flash drive.

I've defragmented my drive.

The only thing I haven't done is play with decent load times.



#459
Weyland Yutani

Weyland Yutani
  • Members
  • 14 messages

Finally, really People on Single GPU Setups specially Nvidia dont get 60 FPS in the "MAIN" Game on max Settings or near max Settings specially because many Settings dont have any effects on Performance when lowered. Also there is Stuttering going on and i dont talk about that in Cutscenes, 30 FPS look like 20-25 FPS and everything between 30 and 60 FPS is a Stuttering Frameshow.

 

Both Nvidia and EA Need to get their things right ASAP specially for high end Setups with 6-8 Core I7 and GTX 900 Cards what should easily catch the Game when AC Unity and Far Cry 4 ran at solid 60 Frames on max Settings on GTX 980 Setups @ 1080p and that are Games that are messed up with Performance and lack of optimisation.



#460
Scoobydooby

Scoobydooby
  • Members
  • 108 messages

^ totally agree. I tried tonight with and without SLI, lowered settings, tried various console commands.. fps didn't move from avg 45 singler card, 60-70 SLI, but stuttering lots.. this is with .75 drivers. I found the ones I used before. .47 were better, but too lazy to go back to them now.

 

Hope that a patch comes out soon.. the stutter breaks immersion too much for me to wish to play until its resolved.



#461
Guns90

Guns90
  • Members
  • 10 messages

^ totally agree. I tried tonight with and without SLI, lowered settings, tried various console commands.. fps didn't move from avg 45 singler card, 60-70 SLI, but stuttering lots.. this is with .75 drivers. I found the ones I used before. .47 were better, but too lazy to go back to them now.

 

Hope that a patch comes out soon.. the stutter breaks immersion too much for me to wish to play until its resolved.

 

^^^THIS!!!

 

 



#462
XMissWooX

XMissWooX
  • Members
  • 732 messages
How are you all measuring your FPS if you're not using using FRAPS?

#463
Scoobydooby

Scoobydooby
  • Members
  • 108 messages

How are you all measuring your FPS if you're not using using FRAPS?


I have used fraps and also command line I game..

Perfoverlay.drawfps 1

#464
Robbiee

Robbiee
  • Members
  • 6 messages

Just got the game, AMD fx8350 4.0ghz CPU (non overclocked), gigabyte windforce r9 290, avexir 2133 16gb RAM. I'm using mantle and am getting most of the time 60 - 90ish fps, but with mantle the game seems to stutter quite abit, not a lot though. With dx11 the game seems to be able to run at a stable frame rate, but at some points a lot lower than mantle. Other than the stuttering with mantle, I've only got one major problem with this game... WHY IS IT SO INTENSIVE, it stresses out my cpu like im running prime 95 or something, and my gpu gets as hot as 82 degrees which i have never seen it get to. Is the game suppose to be this demanding?? Or do you guiys reckon its something that they should fix? I also heard that the DRM being used with this game is apparently very cpu intensive. Maybe that is why?


  • natalscar aime ceci

#465
JerZey CJ

JerZey CJ
  • Members
  • 2 841 messages

Have the devs said anything about the DirectX issue? I'd rather not have the game crashing whenever I try to play it.



#466
zeypher

zeypher
  • Members
  • 2 910 messages

First thing to everyone, please disable all overlays and all programs that attach to a game. Meaning no fraps, Afterburner, Riva turner, Xfire, Raptr etc while you are at it disable origin ingame as well. Secondly clean install of the new beta drivers for your gfx cards. Third run the game in exclusive fullscreen as sli / crossfire does not work in borderless window. Fourth DO NOT run MSAA if you do not have spare performance. If you find you need more turn MSAA off. Finally do not use the cutscene fix as that is causing issues, so i advice you all to try without that fix.



#467
Cerrydd

Cerrydd
  • Members
  • 2 541 messages

In case laptop usability is of interest to anyone:

 

I played a bit last night (levelled up once) on a Dell XPS 17 (8GB, i7, nVidia GT 550 M graphics chip) that's a few years old (90% sure those are the laptop specs - if you were planning on buying a used laptop with those chips let me know and I'll double-check, otherwise don't rely on this!), and except for shiny hair (which I've read elsewhere on here I have to adjust "mesh" for, thanks to those who gave that info) I was satisfied with performance and appearance even on relatively low graphics settings, but high resolution (1920x1080).

 

Another laptop user here. Asus laptop is almost 3 years old with i7-2670QM @2.20, nvidia GT 540M 1GB, 8GB RAM and Windows 7. When I downloaded the nvidia driver, it said I don't meet the minimum system specs. Ran the game, it automatically set everything to low/off except the textures which were on medium. Game ran fine (I'm don't need high fps), ~20-25 fps with Fraps running in the background. Turned the mesh quality to high and textures on medium, the rest still low/off, left Fraps running and ran the game through Razer booster. Still ~20-30 fps, occasionally 40 and when it's very crowded it sometimes dips below 20, though never lower than 15, and never for long. I didn't turn off the Origin overlay either.

 

I was pretty worried my laptop wouldn't be able to run it (partially because nvidia gave me the "you don't meet the min specs crap"), but I'm 9 hours into the game and having a blast on my shitty laptop :) 



#468
Lazzerus

Lazzerus
  • Members
  • 2 messages
Running great here. All ultra with x2 msaa as im already at 1440 res. Never dips below 60 with vsync on.
was having a bit of flickering with sli but changed the sli bits as someone else has posted here and works like a charm.
Also running afterburner osd with no problems

I7 4770k@ 4.5 ghz
16 gig ram g skill rip @2133
2x gtx 980 sli @ 1428 mhz
1200 w psu
1440 monitor

#469
Ganjoo

Ganjoo
  • Members
  • 1 messages

I5 3320m (2,6GHZ) dual Core (with HT)

8 GB DDR3 1600MHZ

Geforce GTX 660m 2 GB

128 Gb SSD

Driver Version:344.75 WHQL

 

Running the game in 1600x900, medium details (except Tessellation low ), no AA, SSAO on.

Average 30-35 Fps. Ingame Benchmark : min 27  max 39.

Its playable in 1080p with an average 25-30 Fps in med details.



#470
llandwynwyn

llandwynwyn
  • Members
  • 3 779 messages

@ Anzeroth

 

FX is bottlenecking you badly.

 

Hi, since you seem to know what you're talking about...I've a FX 6100, would it bottleneck a R9 280?



#471
Weyland Yutani

Weyland Yutani
  • Members
  • 14 messages

I really want to know what sync Technology Bioware used for it, even with Vsync on the Frame rate doesnt cap itself at 30 or 45 it only caps itself on 60 and thats the cause of the stutterin and unsmooth gameplay. I get 39 or 43 or 55 Fps with enabled ingame Vsync ? Nvidia Vsnyc doesnt work aswell it also doesnt cap the Frame as it normally should. Mabye i missed some new advanced thing going on but i never saw that in any Game before except with a Gsync Screen what i dont have.

 

I forgot: if you want that fixed download Dxtory and cap the Framerate to whatever you like and tadaa the stuttering is gone for good



#472
Anzeroth

Anzeroth
  • Members
  • 15 messages

@ Anzeroth

 

FX is bottlenecking you badly.

What do you mean exactly?



#473
lehmanndemon

lehmanndemon
  • Members
  • 10 messages

I'm having a fairly disappointing experience with DA:I in terms of performance at this point. I am on a gaming-oriented laptop at present, so my expectations weren't through the moon, but I have had a much smoother experience on many other fairly demanding titles.

 

I am running at 1920x1080 with everything on medium except for textures and meshes which are both on high. I have AA turned to low and AO switched off completely. I get about 30-35 fps most of the time which is just on the edge of playable in my books and at these settings the game just isn't that pleasant to look at. Everything is so shiny and bright that it is hard to make out details of individuals in busy environments (I tried fiddling with gamma and contrast to no avail), and the metals just look so ridiculously shiny as to be unbelievable (I can fix this by turning up settings but it drops fps so low that it is unplayable).

 

I play Skyrim on this machine with quite high settings (cannot recall details of said settings) and don't have trouble keeping close to 60fps. Previous DA titles have also all been gorgeous on it. Titanfall also looked quite nice.

 

Here are my specs:

i7-4700MQ Processor (2.4GHz-3.4GHz)

16gb DDR3 1600

GTX 765m 2gb

 

It's a laptop, but for everything before DA:I it has been so good that I got rid of my desktop rig.

 

I really hope drivers or game updates improve efficiency somewhat.



#474
Nordic Glow

Nordic Glow
  • Members
  • 9 messages

Guys

New driver is a must. I've installed it and my fps has risen to 50-60 from 15. Even with gtx 660m

So dont give up before trying the new driver.

Gl and regards.



#475
MaNiAxE

MaNiAxE
  • Members
  • 1 messages

Hey all,

 

i5 2500k @ 4.4 ghz

16gb gskill

had a Gigabyte GTX 680 SOC in up until this afternoon, got jack of mid 30 fps in built up areas (with a whole raft of settings compromisations) so bought an EVGA GTX 980.  The difference is staggering to put it mildly.

 

Now running around with everything on ultra except tesselation (which is on high) and post processing which is also on high.  MSAA is off (makes no visible difference to me) and post processing AA is on medium (again, high makes no visible difference to me).  1080p, 60fps rock solid.  No stutter, negligible settings compromises.

 

Money can buy happiness.

 

P.s - There is a little trick that I discovered while living in compromise-ville this afternoon with the GTX 680.

 

For a smoother experience in non-built up areas where your frame rate doesn't drop below 50fps do the following:

 

In game settings under DISPLAY change to 1080p @ 50 Hz.  This will give you a buttery smooth 50fps in rural areas where V-sync might have otherwise dropped you to 30fps when it saw something between 51 and 58 fps (or thereabouts). I know it's not 60fps, but if you can tell the difference between 50fps and 60fps you are doing better than most I reckon.

 

Happy gaming - the game we've been waiting 3 years for is here :)