So, I got the 360 version, and I'm making my character, and the scar option doesn't seem to be here(The stubble is abysmal in this version, by the way.)
Anyone know if this was excluded?
EDIT: Looks like it was. Normally, it's under SCARS AND TATTOOS, but it's only TATTOOS here... Really gonna have to upgrade to another format...
No scars on the PS3 version either. Just Tattoos. WTF?
I'm wondering what else was cut out from the last-gen console versions... 
What? Are you for real?
Scars was one of the big things I liked hearing about in the new CC. Why the hell are they gone!?
My guess? Being able to control the depth of the scars was too much for the wee last-gen systems to handle.
I mean I can live without it. I was looking forward to it, but it would have been nice to get a warning. We were repeatedly told that "aside from some graphic issues" the games were the same across all platforms.
Graphical issues meant no scars? Kind of missed the plot there. What else counts as a graphical issue?
What?
Really? Ugh.
My PC probably can't run this, but damn if I'm not considering it.
wtf, it doesnt make any sense that it's last gen.... they should be there
Bullshit I should have bought PC, but I can't get a refund. I guess i should hope i can download the ps4 version when i buy a ps4.
Guest_Caladin_*
Bullshit I should have bought PC, but I can't get a refund. I guess i should hope i can download the ps4 version when i buy a ps4.
you can but for me i will not support the psn prices, there asking £55 for standard edition and £65 for deluxe
It doesn't even really make sense. All they had to do was disable the severity slider, not remove scars altogether. Hopefully they're patched in, but I doubt they'll release anything like that for the last gen consoles.
I found this out earlier, getting the "Xbox One" version of Dragon Age Inquisition on the 3rd of December hopefully if I get enough cash money then folks!
Wow that is strange. Have scars/tattoos for my PS4 version
but, I can upgrade to the deluxe edition for just $9.99 on the Xbox 360 version when I get the chance to load enough money onto my debit card Mastercard next month hopefully, the people that I get monthly money from screw me over sometimes folks!
Previous gen consoles couldn't handle the rendering. I don't think people really know how hardware intensive detailing can be, especially if you want it to look good. There are already some rendering techniques they had to exclude from the overall game because then they wouldn't have been able to make it on last gen at all.
If you ever heard PC players say "consoles are holding gaming back" during last gen, that kind of stuff is mostly what they meant. Last gen consoles have less on board memory than most tablets.
This deeply saddened me.
And I won't be buying DLC for last-gen, if they even care that much about us to make it multi-platform. I lvoe the game to death but the last-gen performance is so poor it feels intentionally bad...
360 is also hella bugged
make sure to make lots of manual saves!
i have been plagued by the auto save bug multiple times
Funny how ME1 has scars yet DA:I doesn't. Also funny how ME3 is way better graphically than DA:I. They just didn't bother with the last-gen versions.
I get people liking scars but is it really THATimportant?I wish we would've known it beforehand so I wouldn't have gotten it for 360.
Xbox 360 was cutting edge... in 2005.
That was ten years ago. It's unreasonable to expect today's games to look and run well on such outdated hardware.
Funny how ME1 has scars yet DA:I doesn't. Also funny how ME3 is way better graphically than DA:I. They just didn't bother with the last-gen versions.
ME1 is a tiny game by comparison and is running on an engine optimized for the hardware that existed at the time. Not as much effort goes into making last-gen versions of next-gen games because it's hard to scale everything down and still have it look pleasing to the eye, especially when all of the promotional material features the next-gen version which is what everybody sees.
Then dont make it. Then dont come out and say theres not a noticeable difference other than some missing background characters.
Please stop with they tried to make old gens happy but the system is limited.They must have known right away?? And they charged us the same
Go out and try it. Its graphically poor and runs poorly.
Where did they actually say there was no difference other than some characters in the background? Do you have a source for that?
A lot of this boils down to common sense. You're playing a next-generation game on hardware that is a decade old. Id charged $50 for their DOOM 3 port on the original Xbox and large sections of content in that game were cut just to get it to run smoothly. The game looked horrible compared to it's PC counterpart, but it was something I knew going in because, by that time, the Xbox hardware was very outdated, and that was only three years after the original Xbox launched.
We're talking about a ten year gap here with the 360 and PS3. As a consumer, you have to know something about what you're buying. In this case, a last-gen port of a next-gen game. History has shown that these types of ports aren't of the highest quality. It's there if you want it, but it's not recommended. I think Bioware could have done a better job with their marketing of the last-gen versions and showed them off more so people would have a better idea about what they're getting into. But at the end of the day, it's your responsibility as a consumer to research what you're buying and to not expect hardware that is considered ancient, to perform miracles.
Retour en haut