Aller au contenu

Photo

Fade Shroud and "bad" looks...


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
27 réponses à ce sujet

#26
SusanStoHelit

SusanStoHelit
  • Members
  • 1 790 messages
Well, there's no comet-tail on pc. And I kind of like the look. I always spec Wynne as AW and she's like that. Both my mages are AW for one of their specs. Of course, I don't actually turn Combat Magic on until I'm in combat. Yay for the Advanced Tactics mod.



I don't like the crouched stance if Shield Wall is active out of combat - or the red glow of Threaten. Fade Shroud is fine by me. But we each have our personal preferences.

#27
angj57

angj57
  • Members
  • 408 messages

AntiChri5 wrote...

Sustanable talents should not be visible during conversations (like with helmets).



Amen. I find the shedding pebbles from rock armor distracting during dialogue, same with the bard song effect when Leliana is in the party.

#28
miltos33

miltos33
  • Members
  • 1 054 messages

Lakmoots wrote...

If Rock Armor *was* the solution... then aren't you already using an extra sustainable and getting more fatigue... sorta self-contradictory!!

My solution is pretty much the same... and it is a "best of both worlds" solution.

Of course, highly unlikely.

No, my post wasn't self-contradictory, because if Fade Shroud was also sustainable that would be one more sustainable on top of rock armour which is a must have spell for Arcane Warriors in any case. The greatest concern for an Arcane Warrior build is the management of fatigue and mana. Therefore, a passive upgrade to Combat Magic and Aura of Might should always be preferable to one more sustainable.

However, in terms of bad looks I can't really argue with you, because this is simply a matter of personal preference.