111 réponses à ce sujet

[helpthisguyplease]

I am that far with the main story but I just do not like any of them but who knows maybe a sidequest might provide that option were I can chose none.

[Wissenschaft 2.0]

You can choose to "punish" the side you pick, in a manner of speaking. So just because you pick a side doesn't mean you endorse that side.

[TheTurtle]

You can choose to "punish" the side you pick, in a manner of speaking. So just because you pick a side doesn't mean you endorse that side.

Spoiler

Choosing the Templars only to make them disband and bend the knee was a truly awesome moment l.

[Chernaya]

I'm wanting my mage to side with the mages, but I don't like what they're up to so I do hope I can choose them while still clearly showing my disagreement with their actions. Both sides are like... dude, no.

[Wissenschaft 2.0]

I'm wanting my mage to side with the mages, but I don't like what they're up to so I do hope I can choose them while still clearly showing my disagreement with their actions. Both sides are like... dude, no.

 

You can do that for both the mages and templars. Theres both a support and "punish" time option to gaining either of them as allies.

 

I'm really happy about this since you now have a lot more choice in how you handle the mage vs templar war then you did in DA 2.

 

And yes, which side you choose and how you treat them are both important to the story and will be reflected in consequences latter on.

[Andreas Amell]

Choose a bunch of brutes in skirts or whiny sorcerers in skirts. Yeah, I'd just bring them both to heel. 

[Warden Commander Aeducan]

Choose a bunch of brutes in skirts or whiny sorcerers in skirts. Yeah, I'd just bring them both to heel. 

Not possible. 

[Willowhugger]

Not possible. 

It's terrible you can't dissolve the Templars AND side with the Mages.

[Ryriena]

So basicly just side lining things a bit for the next guy, I feel so like a poltical leader.."

[helpthisguyplease]

It's terrible you can't dissolve the Templars AND side with the Mages.

If I chose one side over the other will I have to fight the other side that I did not chose?

[Willowhugger]

If I chose one side over the other will I have to fight the other side that I did not chose?

 

Spoiler

Pretty much, the side you don't ally with is completely corrupted by the Elder One and turned into mooks.

I wanted to destroy the Templars but this is like watching them become Darkspawn.

A fate I wish on no one.

[Ryriena]

Spoiler

Pretty much, the side you don't ally with is completely corrupted by the Elder One and turned into mooks.

I wanted to destroy the Templars but this is like watching them become Darkspawn.
A fate I wish on no one.

That's just dumb to me!

[Sylentmana]

So there is no neutral option to just destroy them both?

[Willowhugger]

So there is no neutral option to just destroy them both?

 

No, you have to side with one or the other.

Spoiler

But you can keep one side as prison labor.

[Br3admax]

You need them to combat the Breach.

Anyway, my mage went with the Templars. Easy choice once I saw what their superiors were doing to them.

[Sylentmana]

No, you have to side with one or the other.

Spoiler

But you can keep one side as prison labor.

Spoiler

So can I side with one and punish them while imprisoning the other?

[Willowhugger]

You need them to combat the Breach.

Anyway, my mage went with the Templars. Easy choice once I saw what their superiors were doing to them.

 

I do take some comfort that siding with the Mages means the Templars are....chastened.

[Willowhugger]

So can I side with one and punish them while imprisoning the other?

 

Spoiler

No, the other ones will all die.

If you don't side with the Templars, for example, they become mindless Red Templar lyrium monsters.

[Br3admax]

I do take some comfort that siding with the Mages means the Templars are....chastened.

If you think torturing is chastening, then you have no idea what that word means.

[Willowhugger]

If you think torturing is chastening, then you have no idea what that word means.

 

It's called understatement for dramatic effect. See the elipses.

 

I complained about their ending either way,

 

But I'm trying to be glad, though.

 

Spoiler

The Templars destroyed.

Even if it's in such a way as to make me feel sorry for them.

[Br3admax]

Ugh. A mage apologist.

[SgtSteel91]

Glad [actually not glad] to see people still arguing over Mages and Templars even when they can settle the score.

[wcholcombe]

you can basically destroy both

 

Spoiler

If you side with the templars and conscript them the templar order seases to exist. If you side with the mages and conscript them they basically become your subservient to the Inquisition.  The side that you don't side with ends up ceasing to exist very soon thereafter.  What I am trying to figure out is how it all plays out in the ending slides.....I definitely do not want the one slide I have seen.

 

Now the choices you have with the wardens and how Varic's response changes...that is interesting.

[Willowhugger]

Ugh. A mage apologist.

No, I'm a mage terrorist. Apologist would imply I care about the Muggles opinion.

 

*raises Dark Mark into the air and laughs maniacally*

[HeyCal]

I sided with the mages and made them our full allies in my inquisition! I'm very pro-mage (much to Vivienne's disdain) and my Dalish elf mage wanted to give them all the chance they had at becoming their own people. I don't immensely care if the Chantry is happy or not, I'm making sure my inquisition is as progressive as they can be! Making the world a better place.

 

I just couldn't get myself to side with the Templars but man

Spoiler

The chance to disband them is super interesting, maybe in my next playthrough!