Dear Moderator (Class section with Mage/Warrior/Archer Subforum)
#1
Posté 19 novembre 2014 - 08:37
My mistake on the wording. Not Subforum(s) plural. Subforu(m) singular.
Example: Your favorite class is Archer.
You come to the forums. Click on Multiplayer section.
Once you enter multiplayer section of the forum.
You see a "Classes" section, so you click there.
From there you will be greeted with the three available classes:
Mage
Archer/Rogue
Warrior
Since your favorite character is Archer, that's the selection you make.
You are now greeted with all threads regarding Archery/Rogue class being discussed here. Tactics, Team compositions, builds, weapons, crafting. All nice and neat within its own section.
*Apologies* for the walkthrough, but I seem to have confused at least one member whom at first did not like my request, but after I explained what I meant, he did in fact like it and would want us to have this Subforum section regarding classes.
So with that, I thought I'd explain it as I did above to hopefully avoid any future miscommunication from my part.
If thread title does not reflect accurately what I am saying. Please assist me in phrasing it better.
*Original OP*
This would help keep the forums neat and most importantly allow us the community to dissect every class in a more focused space. Thank you.
- GrommitSmit aime ceci
#2
Posté 19 novembre 2014 - 05:23
#3
Posté 19 novembre 2014 - 05:31
There actually good threads with full info on some classes on this forum. Just search well. Or use "search".agree 100%. ive been digging all day trying to find complete skill tree details for the 12 MP classes and cant find anything besides the three available from the start.
But generally I think there should be 3 main class subforums with stickied thread for every character.
#4
Posté 19 novembre 2014 - 05:50
Agreed. Much easier to have one single point to go to.
#5
Posté 19 novembre 2014 - 06:23
you young whippesnappers and your separate sub-forums
when I played ME3 MP we had over 50 characters and only one forum
and we LIKED IT!!!
we LOVED IT!!!!
#6
Posté 19 novembre 2014 - 06:37
#7
Posté 19 novembre 2014 - 06:38
#8
Posté 19 novembre 2014 - 06:39
One each for warrior/rogue/mage would be great
#9
Posté 19 novembre 2014 - 06:47
Yeah, having a forums to discuss tactics, abilities and equipment for the Warrior, Rogue and Mage would be great. It would also provide an appropriate place for class builds or guides. Make it happen Bioware!
#10
Posté 19 novembre 2014 - 07:04
This would help keep the forums neat and most importantly allow us the community to dissect every class in a more focused space. Thank you.
I'd prefer that they didn't do that.
Even if the advantages outweigh the disadvantages (I don't believe they do) it requires someone dedicating time to changing the forums, and addressing all the registration and access issues for little, if any, benefit.
As it is, access has been problematic since they added the new sub-forums, and I believe they're still sorting that out (I wasn't able to post in several DA:I forums yesterday, I haven't checked to see if they've fixed the problem yet.)
Edit: In addition it will add work for the players doing testing, as they will have to add extra links to cross-reference other forums, instead of maintaining all the information in the same place.
If you click the third link in my signature, "ME 3 MP Resource Library by Dragonracer," you will see the MP forum's strategy and class guides. Now imagine having to duplicate, triplicate, that information across every sub-forum. You're asking the people volunteering their time to do testing and guides to do extra work to accommodate sub-forums that are unlikely to actually make anything easier for people to find.
Use the DAMP Resource Library equivalent to find what you're looking for, as the information is added. I suspect Dragonracer will be busy playing for the next week or so, but I'm sure the library will grow fairly quickly after the game has been out in all markets for a few days.
#11
Posté 19 novembre 2014 - 07:06
ive searched for hours. im looking for detailed skill tree info on all multiplayer classes, and all i found was the first three that are ready from the beginning. if you know of a thread with this info, please link, because search is yealding zero results. maybe its mobile web issue, i dont know
i should add, i mean for DA inquisition. just realizing there are multiple game topics on this forum
It's only been a few days. It will be the players writing these threads, so you'll need to give people time to figure it out before they start doing it.
In the meantime, you'll have to experiment a bit for yourself. I suspect it won't be too long before people start doing write-ups, but not all markets have even had the game released, yet, so it's a bit early.
- Paulyj113 aime ceci
#12
Posté 19 novembre 2014 - 08:10
Yea that'd be nice.
I really want a bug/feedback thread for multiplayer so it'd be easier for them to see problems. Had the issue where you couldn't move the camera at all yesterday and that was annoying.
#13
Posté 19 novembre 2014 - 09:38
You are wrong. I am not asking for none of that which you speak. I am asking, to simply, here in the mulitplayer section which has subforums of:I'd prefer that they didn't do that.
Even if the advantages outweigh the disadvantages (I don't believe they do) it requires someone dedicating time to changing the forums, and addressing all the registration and access issues for little, if any, benefit.
As it is, access has been problematic since they added the new sub-forums, and I believe they're still sorting that out (I wasn't able to post in several DA:I forums yesterday, I haven't checked to see if they've fixed the problem yet.)
Edit: In addition it will add work for the players doing testing, as they will have to add extra links to cross-reference other forums, instead of maintaining all the information in the same place.
If you click the third link in my signature, "ME 3 MP Resource Library by Dragonracer," you will see the MP forum's strategy and class guides. Now imagine having to duplicate, triplicate, that information across every sub-forum. You're asking the people volunteering their time to do testing and guides to do extra work to accommodate sub-forums that are unlikely to actually make anything easier for people to find.
Use the DAMP Resource Library equivalent to find what you're looking for, as the information is added. I suspect Dragonracer will be busy playing for the next week or so, but I'm sure the library will grow fairly quickly after the game has been out in all markets for a few days.
Combat Strategy and I forget the rest. All they have to do is add:
Classes
Once you click classes
The archetypes that are in MP should come up with they're own discussion forum. In fighting game forums we have been doing this since the beginning of time. This is a norm for most game forums that have a game involving classes.
It lessens clutter, it lessens using search and it resolving every single thread/post that mentions the class you are searching for, but nothing that has to do with what you originally looked for.
You are making it seem as if I am asking for a manned mission to Mars. Stop trying to be complex.
If they are volunteering their time. I would not know that. What I know, they have already done a great job with setting what is already set up. I think, even they, the volunteer mods, would appreciate what I am requesting, for it benefits us all whom play the game. Which I am sure they do as well.
#14
Posté 19 novembre 2014 - 09:42
#15
Posté 19 novembre 2014 - 09:51
So what you are saying.Not sub for each character. That's insane. A skill section though would be nice.
Example. Your favorite character is the Archer.
So come here to the forums. You click on Multiplayer section. Then it opens up and you see the "MP Classes Section" you click there.
It then opens up with
Archer/Rogue
Warrior
Mage
You click "Archer/Rogue"
And all the discussions regarding Archer from tactics, builds, team compositions, is all stored nice and neat in there. And that's insane? You have a very kaleidoscope view of insane. It sounds disrespectful, but I don't mean in that way. I am just saying your definition of insane is completely opposite of mine.
This is typical in games that feature classes/ fighting games.
Example: (To add perspective click the link and just scroll down *see all those names* every fighter has its own section, maybe I'm using the wrong word in subforum but I just mean it's own space)
http://www.ultra-combo.com/forums/
Now before you respond off of my example... *Obviously* with this game it would NOT be to that extent as in that link. It would be as I listed it above, because ultimately, every archetype in this game fits into one of the three (Mage, Archer, Warrior)
My definition of Insane... is what exists now currently. It's all over the place.
#16
Posté 19 novembre 2014 - 10:19
#17
Posté 19 novembre 2014 - 10:22
Thank you for pointing that out to me.
Fixing the OP and Thread title. If thread title does not reflect accurately what I am saying. Please assist me in phrasing it better.





Retour en haut






